This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

The future of energy generation and storage

Jump to new
There is no denying the above statement, but it would be folly to think China dragged us through the economic crisis, rather than China was furthering its own ends and our raw materials were required for their growth.

To think China feels any benevolence toward us, is as fraught with danger as thinking any other major nation does, those that wish to access our minerals all look toward us as a source of supplying their resource needs.

We require at least a modest ability to supply, or quickly be able to supply, critical infrastructure support.

If we purchase all of our renewable equipment from China, which we no doubt will.

The ability to replace failed modules has to be a consideration, China has already shown its willingness to apply punitive justice on Australia over relatively small issues.
 
sptrawler said:
There is no denying the above statement, but it would be folly to think China dragged us through the economic crisis, rather than China was furthering its own ends and our raw materials were required for their growth.
Click to expand...
When you can name a country that would not want to trade its way out of a crisis because it had the means to do so, you might have a point.
sptrawler said:
We require at least a modest ability to supply, or quickly be able to supply, critical infrastructure support.
Click to expand...
Making solar panels does not achieve this end.
sptrawler said:
The ability to replace failed modules has to be a consideration, China has already shown its willingness to apply punitive justice on Australia over relatively small issues.
Click to expand...
If you followed politics you would know that China makes it clear that when other countries act against it unfairly (in their eyes) then they will take compensatory actions. The beginnings of the tit for tat arose after Huawei's 5G was considered a national security threat. 5G was going to be worth $billions, so calling it a "small issue" doesn't cut it.
Moving on to your point, Europe, America and India make modules, so there are many future supply options available to Australia.
The real issue here, as with AUKUS, is why do it when it only makes sense if you are a fanatical nationalist.

On topic, nobody in their right mind would try to make something from scratch when there was not only no local expertise or supply chain, but where there was no market for an uncompetitive product. On this latter point, in the next 2 years Jinkosolar alone will complete a new plant capable of annual production equal to almost 2 times Australia's installed capacity. JinkoSolar - a vertically integrated manufacturer - said it hopes to ship between 100 GW and 110 GW this year.
 
rederob said:
Moving onto to your point, Europe, America and India make modules, so there are many future supply options available to Australia.
The real issue here, as with AUKUS, is why do it when it only makes sense if you are a fanatical nationalist.
Click to expand...
All money going out of the country with little benefit here.

Although your economic arguments stack up, all countries subsidise their manufacturing in some way, there is no reason Australia should be any different.
 
SirRumpole said:
All money going out of the country with little benefit here.
Click to expand...
To get anyone to buy a local module would require a government - ie taxpayer - contribution greater than 200% of the price of manufacture, and even then it might not be enough. Your points are almost as vapid as the nuclear case which does not fly in Australia.
SirRumpole said:
Although your economic arguments stack up, all countries subsidise their manufacturing in some way, there is no reason Australia should be any different.
Click to expand...
There is a big difference between subsidising an industry like automaking which has a strategic benefit (in a military sense) and massive multipliers, plus the capacity to cater for local circumstances at an affordable price point, and subsidising a globally generic solar panel industry with limited employment potential and no viable market.
 
The real issue here, and this has huge implications for energy supply, is simply that the present Australian economic model looks to be at its end.

Simple as that. Change is required and whilst I'm very unconvinced about solar panels being the answer, I've yet to hear any credible plan that doesn't involve something that could broadly be classified as manufacturing, refining or at least processing something.

What's the alternative way forward?

The given is that if the answer is to manufacture something, then doing so requires cost competitive and reliable energy supply. That's the starting point no matter what the end product. Without that, we're doomed to fail.
 
Maybe we should take a lesson from China and go b ack to cheap coal.
 
The alternative, of just continuing down the path of dig and ship, is the road to ruin, IMO
It just shows a lack of vision, or a self serving attitude by our politicians.

If as you know, automation and AI is going to reduce the dependence on employing labour, our advantage of processing the ore at the point of extraction becomes more attractive, it really just takes strong leadership and a vision to the longer term.
We actually did do that in the early years of developing our raw materials, that is exactly how Whyalla. Newcastle, Kwinana etc were developed.
Indonesia is actually jumping over us employing our past methods.
They said you can't have the raw materials unless you value add here and as China need them, they are conforming to Indonesia wishes.
Way too many vested interests in politics IMO, no one wants to upset the apple cart and ruin their retirement plan.
All you seem to be doing is giving us an expose on how we got in this mess and adding no input on how we get out of it.
The EU is talking about putting tariffs on Chinese EV's, the US is already putting heavy tariffs on Chinese imports, at the end of the day if the West tariffs negate the cheap labor component then China's advantage gets nullied.
Then they have to increase the wages of their own citizens, to be able to supply the consumer base.
We just need to work out how to stop our own slide.
 
Last edited:
sptrawler said:
The alternative, of just continuing down the path of dig and ship, is the road to ruin, IMO
It just shows a lack of vision, or a self serving attitude by our politicians.
Click to expand...
The idea of producing solar panels that would be unaffordable is hardly a path to prosperity.
sptrawler said:
All you seem to be doing is giving us an expose on how we got in this mess and adding no input on how we get out of it.
Click to expand...
There are literally thousands of products that can be manufactured.
So why choose one that has zero local skill base, technical expertise, supply chain, or viable market?
The purpose of value adding is to put in place a product that is, ultimately, both wanted and competitive in the market.
sptrawler said:
The EU is talking about putting tariffs on Chinese EV's, the US is already putting heavy tariffs on Chinese imports, at the end of the day if the West tariffs negate the cheap labor component then China's advantage gets nullied.
Click to expand...
China's BRI was put in place to tap into developing markets, and all your actions are suggesting is that China diverts supply from the cashed up west to more populous developing nations.
It was never a problem in the past to buy cheaper products from India or China or other low wage nations. But now China is a "threat". This is an unusual proposition because China is nowhere near as restrictive in trade as is America, and militarily has just a few border skirmishes instead of unsanctioned wholesale invasions of nations and extrajudicial killings to its credit.
All this talk of a rules based order from the west is bunkum. America determines the rules it wants everyone else to follow while maintaining its record in the UN as being signatory to the fewest international accords and treaties.

Putting the above politics aside, China now leads in both technology and quality in most areas of manufacturing. This includes solar panels and wind turbines. Turning our back on the best products available when they are also the most competitively priced would just make the renewable transition more costly and less efficient.

(An area where Australia could make big waves is in remote plasma chemical vapor deposition (RPCVD) for GaN laser diodes. Or in WA where you are, actually contract OEC to manufacture drone engines at scale for many government agencies, including Border Force. That's just 2 ideas for improving manufacturing where we already have world class operations but minimal investment. There are dozens more.)
 
I agree, I don't think I've ever said build solar panels, I said if we were serious about it, the Government in 2009 would have supported the Homebush plant in Sydney, which was one of the biggest plants in the World at that time and was exporting panels.
That horse is done, we have to start small scale and build up a degree of self sufficiency, that is the only way we can possibly grow our manufacturing base, we can't possibly build a competitive base competing with China, the U.S and EU will even struggle with that.
We have to think niche and build a skill base, you know exactly opposite to what the brain fart brigade are doing with the solar panel flatulence.
Mark McGowan actually nailed it, as the Perth metro rail network is growing, in 2018 he re launched the Midland rail workshops.
Not huge like 30 years ago where they employed 800 apprentices a year, but started manufacturing our replacement rolling stock, for the aging stock.

This is the problem in Australia, way too many people giving reasons why we can't , one wonders if a lot of people in power are making way too much money leaving things as they are and importing wage slaves, to keep it that way.

The kids were promised a better future by making them all go to uni, because technology was where the jobs were going to be, now 30 years later we haven't enough skilled tradesmen, we are still digging holes and we are still eaiting for the bonanza in technology jobs.
Some might think they have been sold a bunny.
I personally think a Japanese or South Korean battery manufacturer woud jump at the opportunity to build a grid battery plant here, if the incentives were right, container battery banks standard sizes with all the materials here that would have to be competitive with the right settings IMO.
But you would probably find China wouldn't be happy with it.

Made in WA: METRONET railcars to be proudly built in WA

Made in WA: METRONET railcars to be proudly built in WA Sunday, 18 August 2019 •McGowan Government election commitment to bring railcar manufacturing back to WA takes a major step forward •Alstom today announced as the preferred proponent to build 246 new METRONET railcars and a...
www.pta.wa.gov.au


WA Railcar Program

After 27 years, railcar manufacturing has returned to Western Australia at the purpose-built Bellevue Railcar Manufacturing and Maintenance Facility, operated by Alstom Australia.
www.metronet.wa.gov.au
 
Last edited:
Then on a Federal level, politics comes into it, just when offshore wind is going to take off with huge demand.
Surprise, surprise, the terrific on Chinese wind turbines is lifted, but so is the Chinese tariffs on our wine.
So I guess there goes our wind turbine manufacturing.
2013

2024


I guess when all the heavy lifting has been done and the wind farms are up and running, with Chinese equipment, we will then have an announcement about how we should be building them here?
It's all about the optics, but I'm sure you are well aware of that. Lol
 
Last edited:
I see in my last post auto correct changed tariffs, to terriffic.
Well it isn't terrific. Lol
 

Do you think you will still be alive to see our first power reactor?

I don't think I will be.

But if our population gets to 50 million at some stage it might be viable.
 
SirRumpole said:
Do you think you will still be alive to see our first power reactor?

I don't think I will be.

But if our population gets to 50 million at some stage it might be viable.
Click to expand...
I'm 69 this year and no I don't think I will see a nuclear plant built, I don't think we will need one to cover domestic usage, as I said a while back it may be required if H2 eventually is the goto replacement for a lot of the fossil fuel application that can't be realistically converted to an electrical powered process.

It will work itself out as the transition unfolds, if nuclear isn't required it wont be used, it really is a huge outlay and wont make sense if it can't make money.
Also it isn't suitable for cycling, so until we find the limit of renewables IMO it would be crazy to install nuclear, much more sensible and suitable to install gas turbines and maybe down the track consider the situation.

But to try and turn the public against it is counter productive IMO, we should be open minded about all forms of clean energy
 
Twiggy Forrest misses another deadline for its Final investment Decision, and leaves the supplier of the green solar power up in the air.
From Renew Economy

Mick
 
mullokintyre said:
Twiggy Forrest misses another deadline for its Final investment Decision
Click to expand...
In my view the expected and entirely foreseeable outcome.

He's given it a decent shot, so have others, but the bottom line is we've far too many fundamental problems in this industry to be in a position to supply ~500MW to what is effectively a factory of sorts and to do that at an internationally competitive price.

There's entrenched inefficiency leading to higher than necessary costs and until such time as we face and address that reality there's not likely to be overly much success with this sort of thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Gen Alpha
Replies
13
Views
867
moXJO
M
Electricity investments
Replies
8
Views
641
Smurf1976
The Effect of Deepseek on Australian Stocks
Replies
7
Views
737
Smurf1976
SS1 - Sun Silver
2
Replies
27
Views
5K
Sean K
How to totally xuck the worlds largest economy with a chainsaw
Replies
14
Views
546
basilio
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...