- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,650
- Reactions
- 24,557
It was either Honest John or Charlie Court, it actually might have been Court because it was formed when the gas was brought down from Karratha and incorporated under the SEC.Yes, as each element split off now has to make their individual profit, rather than a single entity serving the public good.
Interestingly, not long before I left WA over 4 decades ago the State Electricity Commission of Western Australia plus the Fuel and Power Commission were amalgamated into a single "Energy" Commission to better plan for the State's needs. I know it was a long time ago but I believe the change was put in motion by "Honest John" Tonkin. No doubt @sptrawler will know for sure.
@SirRumpole I read in the AFR this morning that Eraring Power Station, like I said the last thing a politician wants, is to responsible for something that could cause a backlash, even if it was in the publics best interest.
I bet the price was a lot less than the State government got for it when they sold it.
It also highlights we were spot on about our synopsis of the issue facing coal fired generation, the problem is no one wants it, but everyone needs it.
From the article:NSW government knocked back Origin offer to sell Eraring power plant
Advisors believed the company was “socially responsible” and would not shut the plant down in 2025 if the market needed the supply. They were wrong.www.afr.com
The NSW government considered a pitch to buy the loss-making Eraring Power Station in secret talks with Origin Energy last year. But the deal fell apart amid government concerns that underwriting a plan to keep the coal-fired power station open longer could “crowd out” other investments in energy.
After negotiations failed Origin announced the closure of Eraring in 2025.
Origin first approached the NSW government in mid-2021 with a pitch to hand over control of the NSW Central Coast power station under a deal that would transfer ownership to the government in 2023 financial responsibility from 2025 onwards.
A presentation to government in July 2021 opening talks on a deal was blunt about the challenges Origin faced at the ageing power plant, which the company expects could cost $10 million a month to operate from mid-2025.
“The market shift to renewable energy coupled with commitments to build more dispatchable capacity means Eraring is already loss making and this position will deteriorate over the decade,” an Origin briefing pack to the government stated.
Like I said, the Pollies don't want to be responsible for the pain that the transition will cause and is the reason the last Government was allowing the operators to sort it out, now we have a Govt that has actively attacked the coal operators and made a lot of promises about shutting them down.Interesting.
In the current circumstances government owned generators would be important in stopping price gouging.
Eraring could be a good deal in the short term, long term it will be a dead asset of course but at least there would be some price competition in the market before that.
There is a view under capitalism that market forces lead to greater efficiency.
The NEM is proof that this is not the case.
Fortunately for Labor the public won't care how much it costs to fix now as it just has to be fixed.
You never know, the States may have to buy back the stations, they are the only ones in a position to run them, my guess they will have to pay the coal generators a standby allowance to be available. The turbine/boilers can't be just left going cold, the colder they are the longer they take to bring on line.AEMO suspends national energy market.
Implications ?
Energy regulator's drastic step amid ongoing crisis
The national energy operator has suspended Australia's east coast wholesale market, saying it is impossible to keep operating in the current emergency.thenewdaily.com.au
Don't forget the narrative of yesteryear, the Govt workers are slack, inefficient and lazy, it always amazed me because I've worked in both private and Govt and found Govt to be much harder workers.Oh yes, people who make a profit from something will always be cheaper than those who do it at cost.
No, try telling it to the LNP.Don't forget the narrative of yesteryear, the Govt workers are slack, inefficient and lazy, it always amazed me because I've worked in both private and Govt and found Govt to be much harder workers.
But try telling that to the media.?
I dont think the project was stiched together last week, but I could be wrong.This is where Australia should have been heading years ago.
Copyright prevents me from snipping from the article, but when you see BP put $12B into renewables you know it's serious.
That's true I did always find the LNP were more into privatisation.No, try telling it to the LNP.
The only bit I disagree with is the references to "the last decade" which implies it's all the doing of the previous government.Not sure how cluey this reporter is, she's just stating the obvious really but it seems that the media is finally catching up with reality.
The thing politicians and other critics failed to grasp is that there tends to be a huge team spirit aspect to public utilities and so on.Don't forget the narrative of yesteryear, the Govt workers are slack, inefficient and lazy, it always amazed me because I've worked in both private and Govt and found Govt to be much harder workers.
This is what selling off your power stations and then expecting the private sector to run it at a loss, because they have a social obligation that overides their business obligation gets you. LolAustralian Energy Market Operator suspends spot market for wholesale electricity to ensure reliability and avoid blackouts
Looks like the wholesale market is going haywire with huge demand as winter kicks coupled with not enough supply. This kerfuffle is a huge wake up call. Government has been asleep at the wheel hoping private enterprise will fix the problem but surprise, surprise, it hasn't. Energy security is something the government needs to sort out as it's a national security issue.
This is what thinking one election cycle at a time gets you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?