- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,347
- Reactions
- 17,681
Don't know if it still exists but there used to be a scheme where Defence rented houses from private landlords.Ok just throwing a couple of concepts into the ring for discussion
Do not think about it...short summaryOk just throwing a couple of concepts into the ring for discussion
1 I answered an ad for housing for disabled with NDIS funding. On the face of it, it looks good, (of course) but I have several misgivings and possible gotchas over the long-term
2 AirBNB. Seriously haven't really looked into this much at all it was just an idea that came up in discussion. Once again looks good on the face of it but I am sure there are many traps.
As a general principle we are not really that keen on direct real estate investment investment, especially considering some of the posts above.
Petty issues are just not on our agenda of things that we want to contend with. We've got enough of that shxt in our own family/lives, never mind having to deal with other fruit loops.
Nb it's not always the tenants, quite often it is the rental agent which should be permanently in a straight jacket and sedated.
cheers ,A mate rented a house to disability services and can't sell it now until they can rehouse everyone
Don't know if it still exists but there used to be a scheme where Defence rented houses from private landlords.
Presumably the tenants would be reasonable? Nobody's going to trash the place when their employer's the middleman between them and the owner surely? Doing so would be a good way to lose their job I'd think.
Plus if it's rented to a government agency then even if they pay the rent late, you can be pretty sure they will at least pay it.
Close to 20% mgmt fees. And they do a full clean/ restore at end of lease.But from what I remember, the management fees are much higher than normal. But whether there is a tenant or not wont matter, you'll get your $$$.
Don't know if it still exists but there used to be a scheme where Defence rented houses from private landlords.
Presumably the tenants would be reasonable? Nobody's going to trash the place when their employer's the middleman between them and the owner surely? Doing so would be a good way to lose their job I'd think.
Plus if it's rented to a government agency then even if they pay the rent late, you can be pretty sure they will at least pay it.
Close to 20% mgmt fees. And they do a full clean/ restore at end of lease.
I used to own a 3br house in Campbell, next to Russell defence complex in Canberra. As it was 'officer' status, the non-working partner usually kept the place in immaculate condition. And no problem finding tenants
This scheme still exists. I live in a house that was once a Defence rental in a block of 4 Torrens title houses. Only 1 of them is still rented by Defence.
The previous tenant of that house just moved out, I was chatting with him on move out day and he was complaining about DHA as a horrible landlord, they pick every nit and dock your pay if it's not perfect. They moved out as they were buying their own place in Penrith.
This scheme still exists.. I was chatting with him on move out day and he was complaining about DHA as a horrible landlord, they pick every nit and dock your pay if it's not perfect……
The magic word.LEVERAGE.
OPM I love to use it when I can.The magic word.
One of the wisest things I've ever read on this forum, was this : " money... makes... money ".
Meaning, using other people's money ( banks)
It is the way to serious wealth creation.
Simple as that.
As for tenants , up-market R.E. is the only way to go. There is always a keen demand for it.
Sure, you get a lower yield but in the right position, capital gain is the name of the game. You don't need to realise that C.G. either.....just borrow against it. Leverage works. It works like magic.
i love to avoid it ( in most cases ) and sparingly when i doOPM I love to use it when I can.
From an owner's perspective that's not necessarily a bad thing however. If the rent's being paid and the property is being looked after then you're doing OK.DHA are not particularly good. Not really held in too high of esteem inside of defence, at times. It's a real mixture of people you may get (like most jobs I guess). Plenty of friends have complained about them that's for sure. It's usually them sticking rigidly to policies or rules that do not apply/make little sense, even when discretion would apply.
OR you have dreams of re-developing the property in the future , and say start the long haul to have your property re-zoned ( and redeveloped later )From an owner's perspective that's not necessarily a bad thing however. If the rent's being paid and the property is being looked after then you're doing OK.
Arvo Sir R and then there is the problem of willful damage to the joint because they don't care.AirBNB seems the way to go these days. You don't have to put up with bad tenants for a long time and you can charge higher rents because people are only there for a short time.
Downside is some councils make rules about short term rentals and you have to get a place in a trendy location like beach side. Then there are seasonal variations as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?