explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,198
That is absolutely incorrect. You need to check or policies on that.Of course the Greens want Churches closed down and no mention of God.
Just ask Julian Porteous.
The Greens are communists, imv.
-----
Jordan Peterson
I will never use words I hate, like the trendy and artificially constructed words "zhe" and "zher." These words are at the vanguard of a post-modern, radical leftist ideology that I detest, and which is, in my professional opinion, frighteningly similar to the Marxist doctrines that killed at least 100 million people in the 20th century.
I have been studying authoritarianism on the right and the left for 35 years. I wrote a book, Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief, on the topic, which explores how ideologies hijack language and belief. As a result of my studies, I have come to believe that Marxism is a murderous ideology. I believe its practitioners in modern universities should be ashamed of themselves for continuing to promote such vicious, untenable and anti-human ideas, and for indoctrinating their students with these beliefs. I am therefore not going to mouth Marxist words. That would make me a puppet of the radical left, and that is not going to happen. Period
A number of those principles seem highly subjective, and potentially contradictory, particularly 2,3 and 6.That is absolutely incorrect. You need to check or policies on that.
"
Principles
The Australian Greens believe that:
- Australia's cultural plurality is a part of the nation's identity and should be recognised as such.
- People have the right to celebrate and express their cultural heritage within universally accepted human rights.
- All people — regardless of culture, ethnicity, religion, language, place of birth or citizenship status — should have equal rights and the right to participate equally in social, economic and cultural life.
- Australia is a culturally diverse society and this should be fully reflected in Australia's social, business and political institutions.
- The Australian Greens should represent the cultural diversity of Australian society in its own organisation, and in all of its policies, processes and activities, in Parliament and in the community.
- Racism in all forms is unacceptable and the Australian government should combat racial and religious prejudice in all its forms.
- There is diversity within each of Australia's multicultural communities."
and the Australian government should combat racial and religious prejudice in all its forms.
Prejudice against religions, freedom to choose your own pathway in life. If you want to follow a God or be an atheist then so be it. However I am personally against the indoctrination of children, however the parents will dictate this so that's a hard one. But religion taught at schools, no way in my view. However Greens policy would not interfere with the Catholic school system as one example.What is religious prejudice ?
Prejudice against religions, or prejudice by religions ?
- All people — regardless of culture, ethnicity, religion, language, place of birth or citizenship status — should have equal rights and the right to participate equally in social, economic and cultural life.
And this is the official platform, when brain and commonsense leaves the room
- So clearly every of the 8 billions on earth are able/allowed to come here, and demand access to centerlink services, voting rights, pensions,benefit or the right to work..
- Considering billions are on 1 or 2 usd a day, even youth allowance looks like millionaire life.
- All that on the name of our planet.
And the worse is, Explod, you will think i am the idiot to put a mild word
Not at all, you are an intelligent contributor here on ASF.
- All people — regardless of culture, ethnicity, religion, language, place of birth or citizenship status — should have equal rights and the right to participate equally in social, economic and cultural life.
And this is the official platform, when brain and commonsense leaves the room
- So clearly every of the 8 billions on earth are able/allowed to come here, and demand access to centerlink services, voting rights, pensions,benefit or the right to work..
- Considering billions are on 1 or 2 usd a day, even youth allowance looks like millionaire life.
- All that on the name of our planet.
And the worse is, Explod, you will think i am the idiot to put a mild word
Do not take me wrong, i have a leftist in the true sense background as you know by now i have travelled the world and lived/worked in many places. I spent months living in housing estates, now no law zones, met a lot of working poors, some of my near family can be classed so ,while others are upper upper middle classNot at all, you are an intelligent contributor here on ASF.
However most people are selfish because they did not experience a life that taught them to appreciate and seek the best out of all people. I am grateful now to my early hard road and traumatic later life experience as it's motivated my actions for the downtrodden and particularly our ill treated unemployed unemployed.
Welfare like this is keeping people in a zoo, on a feed of **** food and cheap movies now social media
Interesting table here. Australia ranks 22 in social welfare spending per GDP, even lower than the US, that paragon of free enterprise and everyone for themselves.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_social_welfare_spending
If there were no inequity of any sort, one should technically have no social welfare need.
- All people — regardless of culture, ethnicity, religion, language, place of birth or citizenship status — should have equal rights and the right to participate equally in social, economic and cultural life.
And this is the official platform, when brain and commonsense leaves the room
- So clearly every of the 8 billions on earth are able/allowed to come here, and demand access to centerlink services, voting rights, pensions,benefit or the right to work..
- Considering billions are on 1 or 2 usd a day, even youth allowance looks like millionaire life.
- All that on the name of our planet.
And the worse is, Explod, you will think i am the idiot to put a mild word
If there were no inequity of any sort, one should technically have no social welfare need.
Where does it say that all people are able/allowed to come here in order to have equal rights? Seems to me the interpretation is either all people in all places should have equal rights, or all people who are living here should have equal rights. That doesn't mean open borders. It does mean equal criteria for entry.
- All people — regardless of culture, ethnicity, religion, language, place of birth or citizenship status — should have equal rights and the right to participate equally in social, economic and cultural life.
And this is the official platform, when brain and commonsense leaves the room
- So clearly every of the 8 billions on earth are able/allowed to come here, and demand access to centerlink services, voting rights, pensions,benefit or the right to work..
- Considering billions are on 1 or 2 usd a day, even youth allowance looks like millionaire life.
- All that on the name of our planet.
And the worse is, Explod, you will think i am the idiot to put a mild word
In a closed society that may be true but what about inequity brought about by transferring of jobs offshore, tax avoidance by companies etc ?
Maybe societies that pay more welfare are just covering those needs, if so we are still a lucky country if we don't have a big welfare bill in the face of globalisation. It's pretty obvious to me that our mining and agricultural exports are propping us up. If those decline then we might start rising up the welfare scale.
If those decline then we might start rising up the welfare scale.
But that is exactly my point. If we are relatively well off due to the exploitation of our natural resources and don't need to spend as much on welfare as otherwise, then the % of GDP spent on welfare compared to other countries is not a very meaningful figure. It cannot be looked at in isolation, but needs one or more other metrics to give it meaning.
But would us rising up on the welfare scale for that very reason be viewed as good, when in fact it is bad, as it means more welfare is required than before. This is why I don't think that table means anything and why being less than an other country means we are not as good as them in taking care of our citizens.
Our Party is called, The Australian Greens.Where does it say that all people are able/allowed to come here in order to have equal rights? Seems to me the interpretation is either all people in all places should have equal rights, or all people who are living here should have equal rights. That doesn't mean open borders. It does mean equal criteria for entry.
Plod?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?