- Joined
- 14 February 2005
- Posts
- 15,347
- Reactions
- 17,681
Somewhat strangely, I actually agree on that point. It is a magnificent river that's for sure.I have paddled the Franklin River quite a few times. Whatever you think of Bob Browns politics the Franklin is an awesome legacy he leaves behind and I’m eternally grateful. I have met him a few times when returning from a bush walk that starts and finishes at the Liffey property he has now donated to the Bush Heritage Fund. I found him a thoroughly decent bloke. Always offers you a cuppa and his is the only property that I have ever seen the sign “Trespassers welcome”.
That’s the sort of crap I'm sure he won't miss. Your post says much more about you than him.
"I am also looking forward to him perhaps sharing a greater load of the household tasks at home and also just having time to share as a couple in the things that couples do," he said at a press conference where the Australian Greens leader announced his retirement.
"Here comes the washing up," Senator Brown quipped.
Much as I disagree with many of Bob's political views, his private life and sexuality is irrelevant so far as I am concerned and is not a relevant point of debate.That’s the sort of crap I'm sure he won't miss. Your post says much more about you than him.
Fracing in the farm heart land might well change that.
The proposed coal mine in Margret River moved many to the Greens in the region.
Keep rolling those eyes..........
Much as I disagree with many of Bob's political views, his private life and sexuality is irrelevant so far as I am concerned and is not a relevant point of debate.
Yes, this is his most distinguishing characteristic imo: the avuncular, genial, pleasant demeanour which masks some immensely damaging policies.but he is unfortunately a master of appearing reasonable whilst actually implementing a somewhat extreme agenda.
I have attended many development versus environment debates, rallies etc and addressed some of them myself. Suffice to say that I have lost count of the number of times that I've heard spiteful comments about Bob's sexuality in those situations.I wasn't debating anything. I was commenting on a news item. And are you saying that his sexual preferences and advocacy for same sex marriage did not attract the gay vote? In that respect it is highly relevant. Milne will struggle to keep them.
For a time I became an advocate for gay rights as a direct result of this. I also took to wearing a pink shirt to all such environment / development debates and rallies for the sake of making at least a few people think.
Where I strongly disagree is that the decision to save that river was used to prevent the construction of not only that dam but of practically any other large dam on any other river in the state.
This I totally agree with, however I dispear that that is achievable - just look at this thread as a microcosm of our society. The lack of respect for different views just builds so many barriers.There's a need for balance in this and any other debate.
No need to take a hissy fit.
IF you motivations were innocent - I apologise.
I am personally not offended, not in the slightest. My point is aimed at anyone (not specifically you) and is "play the ball, not the man".I apologise if I have offended your sensibilities. However your implication that I made a spiteful remark is just a cheap shot. I now understand why you feel so protective of Bob Brown. He, however doesn't need you protection. He came out of the closet years ago and is proud of his sexual orientation.
By the way do you associate pink shirts with gay men? Stereotyping? And how would you wearing one make "a few people think"?
i've met bob brown on many occasions and often heard him speak. i have the greatest of admiration for bob - he is a true gentleman in the best sense of the word. i wish him continued success for his future.
and congratulations to christine milne too. she is a very capable and wise woman and the greens are lucky to have her!
This is an interesting comment from an article in today's SMH:
“The party's performance under his (bob brown's) leadership has been impressive: "The Greens have increased their share of the vote at five federal elections in a row," says the Herald's pollster, Nielsen's John Stirton. "It's something no party has ever done before."
I see this trend continuing with christine m. as the greens leader. As we continue to pollute our environment and overpopulate the planet, the greens' policies will become increasingly imperative if our species wants to survive ........except for those people with a death wish who want to cling to the values of the old, dying industrial age, and who have no regard for future generations.
i'll keep voting green.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/greens-sustainable-future-20120413-1wyux.\
html
The latter would be related to the fact, as recently revealed by Bob Brown himself, that he does not have Australia's sovereign interest at heart.There have been some blind spots in their policies imo, opposition to hydro power one of the cleanest forms of energy on the planet, and their lack of opposition to increased migration and population growth which will spoil the environment faster than anything else.
.My point is aimed at anyone (not specifically you) and is "play the ball, not the man".
Pink shirts? Well to be honest sometimes it takes a brick and that's one way of doing it. Walk into a room full of people who hate Brown dressed in anything that raises even the slightest question regarding sexuality and I can assure you that eyebrows will be raised. Such is the extent to which many choose to mix completely separate issues - I've even heard plenty of others who "would vote Green if Bob wasn't gay".
Yes, this is his most distinguishing characteristic imo: the avuncular, genial, pleasant demeanour which masks some immensely damaging policies.
Indeed. The Greens put the cleaners through the bush a long time ago. A string of easy victories, over soft targets. The carbon tax runs in a direct line back to the barricades at forests and dams. Country folks were the canaries in the figurative coalmine, but nobody heard....that most people in regional areas do not subscribe to the ideals, philosophy etc. of the Greens and recognise that the Greens do not represent their best interests, there is another party that does that called The Nationals. Milne, therefore, will have a huge task to win over 'the bush' as she put it and not one I think she can ever achieve (withour major policy changes)...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?