- Joined
- 12 September 2004
- Posts
- 1,714
- Reactions
- 1
Slightly off topic, but at the last election I did have to chuckle when the voting form for the Federal Senate had two different parties with socialist in their name.Yes, fair enough - I guess we all have our blinkers on at times...
"The speculation in The Australian on this issue about some difference between myself and my fellow senators was false and misled its readers."
Interesting, nulla. I think I detest her marginally less than I detest the Greens.
I suspect they have some hardline agendas hidden behind their facade of purporting to be conservationists.
Mr Sanders, 78, said scathingly that the Greens were now "concerned with everything except the environment".
"You hear them going on about the tax system, same-sex marriage, adoption, all these social equity issues, but they don't talk about the environment much," he said. The concerns of two such experienced and respected figures in the green movement will intensify the values debate that was kicked off by the actions of NSW Greens figures Fiona Byrne, a suburban mayor in Sydney who stood unsuccessfully at last month's state election, and senator-elect Lee Rhiannon in backing the campaign for boycotts, divestment and sanctions against Israel over its treatment of the Palestinians.
Senator Brown this week defended the actions of fellow Greens senators Sarah Hanson-Young and Scott Ludlam for appearing at rallies in 2009 where protesters called on Australia to sever ties with Israel.
"If you're saying there that members of parliament should not take the stage, or be on a rostrum, or be at a rally, or go on Q&A if you are going to be judged by the people you are there with, then we're getting to a very undemocratic path aren't we," Senator Brown told ABC radio.
Mr Robb contrasted the comments with Senator Brown's demands last month that Mr Abbott apologise for appearing alongside offensive placards at the March 23 carbon tax rally.
Mr Robb, who is currently in Jerusalem on a trade mission with the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce, said the Greens disliked being exposed to the same level of scrutiny as the major political parties.
Candles are made from petroleum, a non-renewable resource that adds CO2 to the air, and are thus not acceptable.I'm sure Bob Brown would have done better than the Labor party on this one. Yes, of course he could. If he had his way we would all be reading with candles at night with the hope the candles might also offer some warmth.
Candles are made from petroleum, a non-renewable resource that adds CO2 to the air, and are thus not acceptable.:
As for the broader picture with the Greens, I'm glad that there seems to be a few more people waking up to the fact that it goes way beyond a dam or two and some trees.
I am fairly indifferent to her. My only concern with her is her ability to bring out the redneck element of our society and their lack of tolerance for others.
I dislike the greens. I suspect they have some hardline agendas hidden behind their facade of purporting to be conservationists.
I dont know whether this has been covered before in this thread, but nothwithstanding any climate change debate about coal mining, what I find puzzling is what the Greens actually mean when they discuss "shutting down coal mining" or similar quotes.
The reason I raise that issue is because some coal companies I held shares in got sold to Chinese state owned companies.
So they mine the coal, export it to China, and keep the profits.
Does anyone have any idea what the Greens are proposing to do about that scenario?
Sure royalties or taxes can be raised, but I would not want to be the person trying to tell China that any serious restriction would be placed on coal extraction (that they need) from Australia by Chinese owned companies.
Good luck with that one
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?