Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
Be quite assured that they can.Jeez I hope they don't halt Uranium mining. They could not be that thick.
Can you give a summary for those of us who missed it?Interesting segment on Insiders (ABC) today including how they currently compare vote wise to the Democrats at their peak.
Very simple, noco. No journalist has taken the trouble to examine the Greens' policies and costings (if any), whilst they have dissected all policies and costings of the two main parties in forensic detail.There are thousands of voters who voted for the Greens who would no have idea what these people stand for apart from the elimination of uranium and coal mining.
They voted in this manner purely because they were brainwashed into thinking the two major parties were on the nose. So it was purely a protest vote. Their percentage of votes is equivalent to the Democrats back in the 80's and 90's.
I have two friends who voted for the Greens. When I mentioned to them some of the Greens polocies and their beliefs, they were dumbfounded.
Why in the hell the Greens were not exposed before and during the election campaign I will never know.
There was one article in the Hun during the campaign with estimates - surprisingly it wasn't a major attack on the party given the paper's right-wing leanings.Very simple, noco. No journalist has taken the trouble to examine the Greens' policies and costings (if any), whilst they have dissected all policies and costings of the two main parties in forensic detail.
The so called professional journalists have hugely let us down in this respect.
Taxation
22.reduce inequities in the current personal tax system by:
reducing tax breaks for high income earners;
removing Fringe Benefits Tax concessions which promote increased use of motor vehicles;
removing the concessional arrangements for Capital Gains Tax;
only allowing losses from an investment to be offset against income from the same investment;
abolishing the 30% Private Health Insurance Rebate in order to increase funding for public hospitals;
taxing family trusts in the same way as companies;
eliminating high rates of effective marginal taxation for those on welfare benefits; and
introduce a new top marginal tax rate of 50 per cent on incomes of $1 million or over.
23.introduce an estate tax with full provisions to protect the family farm, the family home and small business with a threshold of $5 million as indexed from the year 2010.
24.conduct an inquiry with a view to implementing changes to the tax system that address the negative impacts of the GST on:
income distribution;
environmental sustainability; and
business administration costs.
25.oppose any increase or extension to the GST.
26.implement a gradual and long term shift in the tax system from work based taxes to taxes on natural resources and pollution including:
a carbon tax levied on generators of mains-supplied electricity or gas
a national carbon trading scheme; and
other ecological taxes and charges at a level sufficient enough that their prices reflect the full environmental cost of their production, use or disposal.
27.introduce a system of minimum personal and corporate tax legislation to reduce the opportunities for individuals and companies to use loopholes to minimise their tax obligations.
28.conduct a full review of the superannuation system with the aim of reducing its complexity and establishing progressive rates of superannuation taxation.
29.return the company tax rate to 33% and broaden the company tax base by reducing tax concessions.
30.limit tax deductibility for salaries & salary-related expenses for any individual employee to $1million per year.
31.end subsidies and tax concessions to environmentally harmful industries.
Looks like they missed Thorium mining in their policy. Whoopsies.
I attempted to address the individual point's of the Greens's tax policy this afternoon but something went cactus.Their taxation policy is interesting - they are certainly anti-GST which is one of the few major achievements of the Howard government IMO
Lets face it, Mr. and Mrs. Shopping Trolley are 40% Bogan, 40% Committed voters and 20% Pure idiots.
gg
The scariest statement that Gillard has made in trying to win over the Independents, is that the Labor party can work better with the Green dominated Senate.
I think you'd have most of the site lining up to read it Wayne, regardless of political leaning.GG I think you have the proportions seriously messed up there. In research for my thesis on this very topic I have found the proportions entirely different, particularly with regards to the third component.
Will wait for peer review before releasing my findings however.
I agree. And I'd go so far as to suggest 99% of ASF members would be more than happy to forgo the peer review process in this instance.I think you'd have most of the site lining up to read it Wayne, regardless of political leaning.
Did you know in Australia it’s possible to ruin a business if you don’t like the way it smells? This is a heartbreaking story ”” that a government could effectively ruin a family by slowly strangling them in red tape, and that they would have apparently no protection from the courts or the ombudsman. It eats away at our sense of justice. Can we speak freely? Are we all treated equally under the law, or are some laws only enforced according to a capricious whim?
This is the price we pay for vague laws where business people can run ventures, do everything to the letter of the law, with best-practice procedures, winning customers and contracts, yet go broke despite all that because of onerous, impossible-to-meet conditions, that are unmeasurable, and change suddenly, with the added bonus of inordinately long delays. At the moment, Janet and Matts farm, Narrogin Beef Producers, lies empty, unstocked, while debts accrue by the minute.
This is also a story of sovereign risk. Investors in Australian industry beware.
Unused equipment that cost hundred of thousands of dollars lies idle.
How can any business survive the need to get two-yearly licenses which take more than 12 months to arrange; where after four years of planning and preparation, capacity can be suddenly halved without warning; where an appeals process can take 18 months and when the original capacity is finally restored, not only are many new stipulations added, but the expiry date is not extended. After 30 months of a grinding process, the farmer is only left with 6 months before the amended license expires and no way to take out loans based on such an uncertain future.
If the government were a private business paid to arrange licenses, and expected to be evidence based and to respond in a reasonable time, then they would have no customers. Indeed, they could be sued.
Matt and Janet were told their license would be a formality, and they took out loans and contracts for water and grain in advance. Their input costs last year added up to around $10 million dollars. When the capacity was halved there was no way under the laws of biology and commerce that they could bring in the cash flow to meet those costs. When they appealed, they was no timeframe, no indication it would take 18 months to be resolved, so they took out loans, bore the costs, the interest, and paid for water they did not use, and grain no cow would eat. Their money was effectively squandered by the unpredictable rulings of the state government.
I saw this on Watts and followed it up as far as I could. As you say, there's not much press on it, but the minister's determination and some of the departmental documents are available. I didn't find enough there to form an opinion about the rights or wrongs of the feedlot itself or the bank's actions. I also couldn't find anything about the piggery.I mentioned this in the climate thread; this story is all over the blogosphere, but I'm lead to believe it is being ignored by the MSM in WA.
Tyranny: How to destroy a business with environmental red tape
What sort of country allows this to happen. Either allow it or disallow it, but slowly asphyxiating a family business to death with arbitrary red tape is just diabolical bureaucratic bullying IMO
Excerpt:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?