wayneL
VIVA LA LIBERTAD, CARAJO!
- Joined
- 9 July 2004
- Posts
- 25,966
- Reactions
- 13,275
Out of interest without changing the base how do you increase services i.e. health and education maintain a modern military, expand infrastructure for productivity gains etc.
I see many complain now about health and education but with no commentary on how we pay for it.
Given the resources boom shouldn't there be a dividend paided and I base this on the royalties settings decades ago that don't as a % equate to today's pricing some thing that the Liberals are willing to give away.
Out of interest without changing the base how do you increase services i.e. health and education maintain a modern military, expand infrastructure for productivity gains etc.
I see many complain now about health and education but with no commentary on how we pay for it.
Given the resources boom shouldn't there be a dividend paided and I base this on the royalties settings decades ago that don't as a % equate to today's pricing some thing that the Liberals are willing to give away.
IMO the level of funding is not the problem. We all know government bureaucracy is incredibly... obscenely wasteful and inefficient. IME it is wilfully so.
Socialists like to bleat about services and plead for more mountains of cash to fund them, but it just encourages more waste, rather than better services.
Easy. By reducing the bloated bureaucracy. In Qld at least the personnel employed in admin exceed those actually involved in health care.Out of interest without changing the base how do you increase services i.e. health and education maintain a modern military, expand infrastructure for productivity gains etc.
Easy. By reducing the bloated bureaucracy. In Qld at least the personnel employed in admin exceed those actually involved in health care.
And by more efficiency, something pretty much unknown to the bureaucrats.
Depends how much is wastedIs ~30% of GDP as tax not enough to provide welfare and government services ?
If not, then what percentage of GDP is appropriate ?
The net tax from resources needs to be reviewed, but obviously not how the ALP did it. This to me more than anything else is what precipitated Kevin Rudd's downfall and the present electoral outcome for the ALP.
Is ~30% of GDP as tax not enough to provide welfare and government services ?
If not, then what percentage of GDP is appropriate ?
This to me more than anything else is what precipitated Kevin Rudd's downfall and the present electoral outcome for the ALP.
IMO the level of funding is not the problem. We all know government bureaucracy is incredibly... obscenely wasteful and inefficient. IME it is wilfully so.
Simple IF, increase the GST to 12 1/2% or even 15%. The trouble is neither party would have the guts to do it.
Fortunate indeed.Howard fortunately set it up so all the states have to agree pretty much mission impossible and some I think
Howard fortunately set it up so all the states have to agree pretty much mission impossible and some I think
It all depends how it is explained and whether it can be proved to be a better system to raise revenue for the likes of health care. We and the politicians are not facing reality that health care is costing us more and more each year and additional funds are needed to provde the services we all desire.
As I stated on another post, no matter which way a Government tries to provide funds in other ways, we the tax payers are going to pay for it one way or the other.
Agree GST is a good way to collect tax's (maybe best) but the problem is we cannot trust any government not to hike for their own greed its just to big a cookie jar.
Australia must be close to setting a record for a country that's introduce a GST and not raised it a couple of % or more after.
As for rising health care costs and how or if we should pay not sure how this can be tackled but we certainly need the major party's talking about it.
It's a slippery slope.If the GST was increased to 15% with the proviso that the additional money raised would be injected into health, then I can't see how it would not work.
Do you really trust State governments (a) to inject this amount into the health budget, and (b) if they did, to use it wisely, rather than create additional levels of bureaucratic nonsense?If the GST was increased to 12 1/2 % with the proviso that the additional money raised would be injected into health, then I can't see how it would not work.
Do you really trust State governments (a) to inject this amount into the health budget, and (b) if they did, to use it wisely, rather than create additional levels of bureaucratic nonsense?
The word that immediately comes to mind upon reading that is "The Greens".All would be contributing to the GST and who would knock back foreign money?
States honour their responsibilities ??Julia, that would be the proviso and could be audited by the Federal Government to make sure the states honoured their responsibilties.
No reason why the funds could not be controlled by Hospital Boards as Tony Abbott's proposal and so eliminate the bureaucrats. Hospital Boards would know a lot more about their needs than those useless bureaucrats. It worked years ago and it can work again.
I love when i hear people say we need more tax to be able to do more things..... What a load of crap, learn how to manage money 1st before blowing it. I reckon if you went through the whole system and cleaned it up you would find millions upon millions of dollars being misused.
Politician perks is 1 thing i would look at hard..... 1 MP Joe Tripodi (who was my local federal MP before) had racked up over 400k worth of travel in 1 yr! how someone achieves that is beyond me, now times that sorta crap through 95% of every polly in Aus and you would get the picture.
Problem is most polly's think they deserve those perks etc... so all they will expect is more tax to get something done.
They should have a reward for effort program and the people to be the judge for pay increases.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?