- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,760
- Reactions
- 24,739
I have to say the $7 co paymentG20 leaders was a bit ordinary, but the fumbling linked arms handshake has to go down as more cringe worthy than Menzies "did but see her passing by" episode.
Seems the LA Times isn't all that fussed about us yokels and hicks either:
http://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-australia-parochial-20141116-story.html
View attachment 60317
Wasn't that said of Japan in the '80s?
From what I recall, general thinking back then was that Australia could learn a lot from Japan economically (noting that unemployment was relatively high in Australia during much of the 1980's as manufacturing shed jobs).
Yes, I remember how Japan was the envy of the world. Today it is officially back in recession.From what I recall, general thinking back then was that Australia could learn a lot from Japan economically (noting that unemployment was relatively high in Australia during much of the 1980's as manufacturing shed jobs).
They need to get a grip at the SMH.Just looked at the Age and the Trade deal is front page!
The success of the G20 summit is pages 2 and 3.
Not sure what's going on with the SMH.
They need to get a grip at the SMH.
4th was as high as the China Free Trade Agreement got in the SMH.
Today's 2nd SMH story is 'PM confuses China with Tasmania..', which when you read it, is an innocuous slip of the tongue, made by most of us on a daily basis.
They need to get a grip at the SMH.
4th was as high as the China Free Trade Agreement got in the SMH.
Today's 2nd SMH story is 'PM confuses China with Tasmania..', which when you read it, is an innocuous slip of the tongue, made by most of us on a daily basis.
That didn't even make the Age, or at least I can't find it. Sounds tabloid.
Has the SMH got a new editor?
The third story in the AGE though was that Canada is backing the United Nations Climate Fund based in South Korea. This puts our Government out in the cold as it looks like we will be the only ones not contributing. Japan, USA etc. have made substantial contributions. The saving of Abbott, that I think he is counting on will be the Republicans resisting it.
This link is for all those Andrew Bolt haters who have always maintained he is anti Labor and pro Liberal.
The Federal Government is trumpeting the G20 Summit and its global growth target of more than 2 per cent, but economists say don't hold your breath for signs of that growth.
Professor Fariborz Moshirian of the Institute for Global Finance at the University of New South Wales spoke to our business editor Peter Ryan
So why are conservative state Governments acting like centrally planned states? Why are they forcing through investments to increase supply of commodities already in over supply. I could understand if the projects could stand on their own with depressed prices, but both are likely to be at the upper end of the cost curve. The impact on the federal budget will be even bigger as the company tax revenue plummets due to the continued fall in these major exports.
From yesterday's "The World Today", ABC Radio:
The professor seems like a realist. Here is the transcript, with longer version available on the ABC website:
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2014/s4129942.htm
So much frenzy about what is aspirational in both climate change and economic goals, especially Obama with a hostile congress. He can grandstand as much as he likes. Won't make anything happen in the US with the Republicans running things.
I wouldn't be so sure. I was listening to Senator Rand Paul (R) yesterday talking about various issues and he seems to be supportive of doing something about climate change. He's also running for President in 2016.
For a republican he seems very centrist in a lot of ways.
Will be interesting to see hwo things pan out
I'd just be happy to see the Govt stop trying to be a spoiler about taking action on climate change. If the argument is we shouldn't do anything until the major economies do it, then why couldn't Abbott have made it a central theme at the G20 to try and put pressure on the major emitters to come up with some binding targets?
I doubt the major emmitters, would take any notice of anything we told them to do.
All it would have achieved, is to make us look like a bunch of self opinionated twits. No doubt the Fairfax media and ABC would have had a field day.
But it would have been economic and diplomatic suicide.
Having said that, I could imagine Rudd or even Gillard saying something, out there.
By that logic Abbott and Joe were just sprouting hot air for a couple of days because no one was taking any notice.
Hmm... You could be on the nose with that
Agreed. Australians have an unrealistic notion of how important we are in a global perspective.I doubt the major emmitters, would take any notice of anything we told them to do.
All it would have achieved, is to make us look like a bunch of self opinionated twits. No doubt the Fairfax media and ABC would have had a field day.
But it would have been economic and diplomatic suicide.
Tony Abbott says the Indian P.M. is more than almost a kindred spirit, but almost a brother. After less than a week of meeting the bloke in his role as Indian P.M., Abbott comes up with a shallow statement like that to grow a stronger trading partner.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?