How does that determine whether you are a trader or not?ie: basically you can trade once or a million times in a year, and if at the end of the year, you made 100 grand profit, then that is your taxable income.
How does that determine whether you are a trader or not?
e.g. depending on your capital base you could easily have made $100K in a very few transactions.
Are you suggesting that the level of your taxable income determines whether you are classified as a trader or not?
No, Julia: It's the other way around.
Depending on your trading behaviour - for rules see ATO website, e.g. this article - you are classified either as a trader or a casual investor.
Hi Pixel,
Just a question (not trying to pry into your personal income etc). You mention in your post that you could carry forward the losses from share trading (if they occur). Just wondering why you would be carrying them forward? Is it because you feel that you dont pass the Non-Commercial Loss rules (which would allow them to be offset against your other income eg wages) or is it because the share trading is your only source of income.
Reason i ask, my brother has made a fairly substantial loss (approx 80k...which for him is a lot) on a share trading business (and i don't have any concerns about the fact that he is a share trader...he definitely meets the definition). I believe he can offset the loss of 80k against his Wages (approx 120k) because he passes the 20k assessable income test as part of the NCL rules, and therefore will get a sizeable tax refund.
But i cant find anything from ATO that says that a share trader can do that. All the ATO talks about is normal businesses (like farmers, corner store owners, etc)
thanks
pedalofogus
As I thought. Thanks, Pixel. Ollie G's post, to which I was directing the question, created a different impression.No, Julia: It's the other way around.
Depending on your trading behaviour - for rules see ATO website, e.g. this article - you are classified either as a trader or a casual investor.
Guys this isn't true about trading losses.
1. you cannot offset bussiness losses against wage income. (only neg geared prop !!)
2. Unless you passed 1 of the 5 (Ithink its 5) rules like being profitable in 2 of 5 prior years, Use a premises for business worth more than $500,000. Have a business income graeter than 20,000 etc.
So according to that you can claim books and software as capital losses even if you were just paper trading to acquire knowledge and experience?I agree the bigger issue is probably whther people are entitled to describe their activities as 'trading', because if it is not then the loss is capital and can only offset capital gains.
So according to that you can claim books and software as capital losses even if you were just paper trading to acquire knowledge and experience?
What about claiming the market was too volatile to invest so you were educating yourself?
Your tax return is based on what has happened during the preceding financial year.I have one question on taxation as a shareholder -
If I buy a parcel of shares, shares increase 100%, and then I sell 50% and this occurs within one financial year. My capital situation is fundamentaly the same but I now own 50% of the original parcel for no capital expenditure.
Am I as a shareholder obliged to pay capital gains tax on the shares sold?
My understanding is I have no capital gain, and would not be obliged to pay capital gain until I sold some more of the shares which I have left??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?