Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,254
- Reactions
- 11,499
As above charts indicate, this has normally pulled back after the excitement of those significant drill results, but looks to be holding up for the minute. I was waiting for a pullback to add, but might have missed out.
Might depend on the assays from the bottom of that deep hole. If they prove up more strongly mineralised veins at depth, should hold up ok.
I've had a better look through the entire hole assay numbers and it does need to be analysed carefully. Within the 300m hit there's a lot of low grade stuff between the >100g/t intersections that are surrounded by some higher grades but relatively thin widths. The overall 2.4g/t AuEq is significantly bolstered by those huge grades. The veins are going to have to hang together pretty well along their length to understand the deposit well enough for future mining scenarios.
View attachment 149982
Nice commentary on SXG mate! Not sure how I missed this one but fomo got me and bought 300k units at 82c this week. It’ll probably crash and burn now I’m on board so apologies in advance if I jinxed it. I liked the idea of 5 drill rigs with lots of news flow over the next year, and if those deeper holes that are planned end up being higher grade then it will be able to be compared to the neighbours up the road. I’m guessing it’ll hover around 80c for a while until the 28m placement shares are rinsed through.
Thought it was going through a dollar today but fell on its face badly. Oh well maybe a couple more weeks of CR shares to rinse through yet.
Let's hope the bottom of hole 050 and hole 053, about 75m above it (assays pending), have similar mineralisation. Should know within the next couple of weeks.
Yeah I got out mate didn’t shape up. Am buying into NAG now. Looks a lot better valueThe MD's mandatory ramp. "globally significant gold discovery". Do they always say that?
View attachment 150447
Yeah I got out mate didn’t shape up. Am buying into NAG now. Looks a lot better value
Hole 53 is in the lab and could be quite significant as it's above the elephant hole 50. If that gives a similar sort of profile at depth then would confirm 50 wasn't some sort of anomaly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?