Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,237
- Reactions
- 8,483
Scary... Would you be willing/able to identify which super funds were represented by 3 particularly bad outcomes ?So, over the Easter long weekend I traveled to visit my wife’s side of the extended family. Some how the topic of super came up and it lead to 4 members of the family asking me to take a look at their super settings and fee structures. What I saw shocked me.
Out of the 4 people that got me to look at their super accounts, 3 of them were in a terrible condition and have balances far, far lower than I would expect for the wages they have earned and the years of contributions made, one only has $50,000 after over 25 years of contributions from a full time worker. I felt sick when I saw that balance.
The reason for the very poor performance of 3 of the accounts I looked at was the same in each case.
1. A large chunk of contributions was going towards insurances that wasn’t necessary, by my calculations the insurance had lowered the possible balance by over $200,000.
2. Investment settings far to conservative, all 3 of the poor performers had their accounts set too conservative, with large amounts in cash and fixed interest, this had stunted their growth.
3. High fees, all 3 seemed to be paying fees which amounted to a higher percentage of their total balance than what I thought was reasonable.
Super is such an important part of must people’s retirement plans, please make sure
1. you aren’t paying for in unneeded insurance, if you do require the insurance pay in extra each month equal to what your insurance costs are.
2. You have the investment settings set up to make the most of your long time frame, and don’t be to conservative.
3. Pick a low cost fund.
Two were in colonial first state, and one was in Australian super.Scary... Would you be willing/able to identify which super funds were represented by 3 particularly bad outcomes ?
Is there any indication that recent changes to super legislation have improved the outcomes ?( Or was that too difficult to check/assess )
I know you are a very financial savvy person VC, but aren't you asking for trouble giving free financial advice?I have now changed them all over to Australian Retirement Trust and stopped the insurances and put them in more appropriate investment settings.
Two were in colonial first state, and one was in Australian super.
I have now changed them all over to Australian Retirement Trust and stopped the insurances and put them in more appropriate investment settings.
(in the case of Australian Super, the fees weren't to bad, but it was the insurance that was killing the savings rate and also they had her in the conservative feature. She said she had once talked to a financial advisor recommended by the super fund who asked her if she would feel bad if her super balance fluctuated, and she said yes. So they put her into the conservative setting for the past 10 years, she isn't the most financially literate person, but the advisor should have done a better job of explaining the risk vs rewards of a more balanced approach, not just tick the boxes)
I didn’t actually give “financial advice”, I just took at look at their supers and asked them questions, and explained what different things mean.I know you are a very financial savvy person VC, but aren't you asking for trouble giving free financial advice?
I come across many people for whom good free advice is never good enough.
one of the hazards of ( family ) life , do you step in and help ( and risk relationships later ) or do nothing ( and risk relationships later )I know you are a very financial savvy person VC, but aren't you asking for trouble giving free financial advice?
I come across many people for whom good free advice is never good enough.
I feel great now that I have helped them right there ships, and plug the leaks, I wish we had of had the chat 10 years ago though.as long as VC sleeps well , that is a pretty good outcome
I didn’t actually give “financial advice”, I just took at look at their supers and asked them questions, and explained what different things mean.
Their decisions were their own. I just pointed out the facts eg exactly how much of their contributions were going towards insurance and simply asked if they actually wanted the insurance, and they were shocked at the amounts.
I also just explained some basic facts around what the different asset classes mean, but let them make their own choices.
Good approach @Value Collector. It's their money and their decision so they need to accept responsibility for the outcome.
Here is a list of talking points I made as I was looking through their super, of topics I wanted to make sure they understood (it appears as a text message, because I made the note in my message app)
I was trying to think of leading questions to get an idea about exactly what they wanted from their super and how much they knew about the different asset classes. It actually lead to a pretty good conversation and hopefully I hoped to expanded their financial literacy a little bit.
I am in the camp that thinks we need to teach atleast the basics in school, we are expecting people to be financially literate, but without teaching some of the basic ideas in school I am not sure how the avergae person will learn it.
View attachment 155866
Good stuff.
I have been involved in organising superannuation seminars in workplaces where a superannuation provider was conducting the show. Run over a number of days to allow people to attend at various times.
The age groups which attended? Late 40's +. Rarely did those in their 20's or 30's show up. Maybe one or two.
Since retiring I have also attended similar presentations usually run in the evening or weekends. It's the same age cohort who attend. I really do feel younger people are not interested at present. Retirement planning is an issue way, way in the future for many. Not a current concern of which there are many which take a higher precedence.
Again on the matter of teaching in schools, I'd have a few doubts on whether there would be sufficient educators with the necessary level of competence even at a basic level.
Like you and others, @SirRumpole I am all for education on the subject but it's complicated.I think school is maybe a bit early, but certainly there is a place for workplaces to offer seminars and other training.
Young people just don't think of the future (most) want to enjoy themselves NOW, I was the same.
It should definitely not be left until retirement age. How do you motivate the young to take superannuation seriously ? Getting a few OAP's who didn't take it seriously to come along and say how tough life is for them these days.
i wasn't talking about CPA level , but you could still weave in a fair amount of basics into the math curriculum , risk v. reward , the concept of compounding ( interest and returns ) , definitely a brief lesson on insurance ( stuff like who gets insured in mortgage insurance , and loan insurance ) .Like you and others, @SirRumpole I am all for education on the subject but it's complicated.
The issues I have with raising it in school is that most focus is on investment returns. Unfortunately, superannuation has more facets to it than that due to the legislation underpinning it. It would be remiss not to raise matters such as insurance (eyes start to glaze over) which may lead to conversations about death benefit nominations (eyelids commence closing) and possibly Wills (sonorous sound of snoring reverberates around the room.) On the last aspect, I doubt many 20 year old's care about that issue nor would they have a spare two or three thousand floating around to get a properly drafted Will prepared.
Sadly, the families of some young people find out too late about superannuation matters. There was a case last year I think where a young woman in her 20's died. She had indicated she wanted her assets go to her Mum and Dad. Badly advised as her superannuation went to her boyfriend who the Trustees determined was entitled to it as the de-facto spouse. See what I mean about it being complicated?
I do favour employers organising seminars and allowing employees time off but it could depend on the size of the workplace. Then there is the gig economy and those in trade occupations.
It's a vexed issue and I admit I do not have the answers.
but you could still weave in a fair amount of basics into the math curriculum
You haven't bothered to even look. Cease displaying such ignorance - although I strongly doubt that will occur.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?