Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,797
- Reactions
- 10,574
Certainly agree with you Mash re EC and co, and the co includes their mates in the banking industry. I'm also in SICAG and don't know anyone who has a good word to say about the c's whatever way you spell it.
GG if there is anyone in SICAG still supporting c and co you can bet the percentage is extremely small. I know some Sicagers personally who won't post on this forum but have told me in no uncertain terms what they think of storms ex CEO and their comments are the same as Mash's.
To everyone on this thread, I want to say ‘MERRY CHRISTMAS’. And that includes those who I’ve locked horns with from time to time.
To those of you who are suffering financial hardship, have health issues, or are worried about the future, I hope you can put all that aside over the next week as you join with family or friends to celebrate the joy of the festive season.
Thanks for clarifying that Harleyquin.
There has been a perception on ASF, which I have shared, that a majority of SICAG, or the Committee of SICAG supported Manny, and this may have lost the Storm litigants some support in their actions against the banks, by some posters, not necessarily me.
It is good that at last this has been made clear.
gg
I've just read a couple of pages at the start of this thread and PENNYWISE is the first to support storm. Wonder if PW is still so supportive three years down the track?
As Frank said SICAG is a diverse group of individuals. Primarily it's a support group, and in the beginning it was our only support, and from my point of view an exceptionally good one.
The majority of us out here in Sicagland have no time for those in whom we placed our trust. EC had the audacity to send out an email telling us that there was nothing wrong with his advice?!? Personally that was the first time that we were told by Townsville Head Office that he had anything to do with our financial plan?! I was furious.
We were never introduced to him or told that he, a complete stranger, was giving us financial advice. We saw, spoke to and filled out paperwork with our own storm financial adviser, and personally I expected my financial information to stay with our advisor. We never gave him permission to share something so important with anyone else.
The banks initially said something like this "it's all storms fault, it was their advice, we had nothing to do with it". Yet it was the banks who allowed storm to mortgage the homes of thousands of retirees, who provided billions in margin loans, accepted inflated figures from storm, obviously checked none of these figures ( a requirement we're now told) and knew that there was no way these people on a pension could service these loans.
The whole storm scenario smacks of major corruption on the part of all those involved in storm and their partners in crime, the Australian banking industry. I have yet to hear an adequate explanation from any of the banks involved or the stormy ones.
Personally I still get so angry that we their clients have been held responsible for this mess, for so long, when they the instigators and financial backers of this scam, had the financial know how to make sure that it never happened in the first place. The banks and storms only defense to date for causing this human disaster is to blame their clients...disgusting is too 'soft' a word IMHO.
Don't you really? Surely it's a very fundamental point in terms of where the blame falls?I don't care who completed those documents,
Two provisos here:If you get the chance - ask your parents - and elderly relatives - what financial arrangements they may have made for their retirement without asking your advice first.
Don't you really? Surely it's a very fundamental point in terms of where the blame falls?
Two provisos here:
1. In some families such a question could be seen to be intrusive and purely an enquiry as to whether you as the potential inheritor have been well provided for.
2. I'm not sure that too many family members are sufficiently well equipped to offer advice regarding financial matters.
I do understand, however, what has prompted your suggestion. Just think it's a tricky area.
I'm glad to know you were able to enjoy the work Christmas party, Mindstorm.
Getting on with life is probably difficult for some, but the only way to emotional resolution imo.
I wish you and other ex Storm clients the best for 2012, and thank you sincerely for sharing some of your experiences and feelings with us.
As Frank said SICAG is a diverse group of individuals. Primarily it's a support group, and in the beginning it was our only support, and from my point of view an exceptionally good one.
The majority of us out here in Sicagland have no time for those in whom we placed our trust.
...
Personally I still get so angry that we their clients have been held responsible for this mess, for so long, when they the instigators and financial backers of this scam, had the financial know how to make sure that it never happened in the first place. The banks and storms only defense to date for causing this human disaster is to blame their clients...disgusting is too 'soft' a word IMHO.
Don't you really? Surely it's a very fundamental point in terms of where the blame falls?
Two provisos here:
1. In some families such a question could be seen to be intrusive and purely an enquiry as to whether you as the potential inheritor have been well provided for.
2. I'm not sure that too many family members are sufficiently well equipped to offer advice regarding financial matters.
I do understand, however, what has prompted your suggestion. Just think it's a tricky area.
I'm glad to know you were able to enjoy the work Christmas party, Mindstorm.
Getting on with life is probably difficult for some, but the only way to emotional resolution imo.
I wish you and other ex Storm clients the best for 2012, and thank you sincerely for sharing some of your experiences and feelings with us.
"Storm staff face job loss, penalties
A FORMER financial adviser for North Queensland-based Storm Financial has been banned from the industry for two years.
A further two will have their work closely supervised by the corporate regulator, after an examination of their role in the failed finance company's operations.
The Australian Securities & Investments Commission yesterday said it had accepted enforceable undertakings from former Storm salespeople Carey Fraser of Townsville and Trevor Benson of Brisbane, as well as former manager David McCullough of Townsville."
More by Andrew Fraser @ theaustralian.com.au
(Frank, I'm sure you will highlight the error in this report)
The question on a lot of Stormies lips is "Who bought all the Stormies units in Challenger and Colonial First State when we were all sold down?"
Much has been mentioned about the 'Storm Holidays'. I've met less than ten people, so less than five couples, who went on these holidays. Not everyone took their 'benefits' out of their investments. The majority that I've met opted to put it back in to ensure a comfortable retirement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?