- Joined
- 21 December 2008
- Posts
- 4,532
- Reactions
- 1
I believe that no decisions have yet been made on any of the cases before the panel, and a further meeting has been scheduled for 3rd December.
"Worrells delivers report on Storm
Findings confidential"
The liquidator of Storm Financial has delivered the findings of its investigation into the failed advisory firm to ASIC.
More by Kate Kachor in Investor Daily here;
http://www.investordaily.com/cps/rde/xchg/id/style/8091.htm
Due to the confidential nature of the report, details of the findings could not be disclosed, the spokesperson said.
I hope it's not to protect the banks. There's a lot us us ex-stormers waiting and hoping for some good news so we can have a better Christmas than last year
"Storm Financial victims eye indemnity policies"
"MORE than 250 Storm Financial victims have flagged interest in funding legal action to recover what they believe is up to $50 million from insurance policies tied to the failed advisory firm."
More by Anthony Marx in The Courier Mail here;
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26442710-3122,00.html
But lawyer Stephen Russell, who represents the Cassimatises, cautioned SICAG members about joining the legal actions.
In a letter, Mr Russell said a claim had to demonstrate that "the client received nothing of any value whatsoever for the fee paid". He said this proposition was "difficult to sustain" and he recommended Storm clients seek alternative advice.
Mr Anderson took exception to Mr Russell's intervention, stressing that Mr Russell defended the Storm investment model even though it could not withstand the worst of the global financial crisis last year.
Mr Scattini noted that Mr Russell was acting for both company founders and victims in lawsuits against the Commonwealth Bank.
You really are confused aren't u GG.... "stick with the Cassimatis Lawyers"...
Have u not cottoned on to the fact that Stephen Russell is the foe..... he represents EC & JC and their puppets and the few poor souls who still think Manny is master ....
I would think that SICAG will not be giving people advice on exactly what they should do... they are simply getting out what information comes to hand and allowing us to make our own decisions.... you really must grab some mortein and get rid of that bee in your bonnet...... you still mystify me with your SICAG model rubbish... what do you mean !!!!... No silly of me to ask really... I know you won't answer that... guess you just like playing the role of SICAG basher in this saga... go ahead knock yaself out...those of us who really are affected by this know just what SICAG has done for us and your opinion matters little.
Mash
Just to let all on the thread know that there is information coming out from left field sometime in the next two weeks that will probably lead to criminal charges.
I am unable to divulge any more information at present.
I heard it on good authority from one of the Secret 60 over a few beers at lunch today at the Marina. There may be less than 60 in the Secret 60 by the way. 59 anyway.
I don't like having food or drink on boats unless I'm fishing on the reef and completely pissed for four or five days, but I made an exception in this case.
gg
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?