- Joined
- 30 June 2007
- Posts
- 7,200
- Reactions
- 1,226
What are the chances of a take over, at these prices, some must be running their ruler over them.
The gas reserves plus the infrastructure assets, are a long term play, as oil prices must recover IMO, OPEC will be hurting as much as anyone else.
It is obvious that O/S companies are eyeing off Australian assets, as has been seen with the Toll and Asciano take overs.
Well done.
Yes well done Sptrawler.
Can I also gloat too? Though not as sweet since jumping in too early at $7.45 (before the bottom fell out).. .though got some at $6, then some at $4.45, then some at $3.97. Would have been a lot richer if could afford that holiday
Now the "experts" all seem to think it's undervalued at $6.88, and this guy Bloomberg quoted now think anything below $10 will considered low by the Board. Not that I'm complaining.
A pretty savage discount to the SP for the entitlement offer. Easy to be wise after the event but there were many commentators urging that action some months ago when the SP was higher and a lesser discount price would have been feasible.
I hold a few.
Don't worry, I'm in the same boat, dollar cost average $5.50.
I still think there will be a lot more price movement, the Gladstone gas plant has started exporting and Santos has plenty of assetts to sell if required.
My guess is, there will be a few take over offers, time will tell.
Tip -
When you hear commentators and oil men making exasperating comments about a take over like the WPL offer for OSH and they included involuntary and off the cuff type comments like, 'they would be better to have a crack at STO and why don't they buy STO." It is a good time to load up on the one they are exasperating over - STO - when the sector falls again after the initial excitementof a consolidation bid like the WPL 4 OSH.
The WPL OSH bid, by the way, isn't nearly as opportunistic as people are pretending, given that WPL shares are relatively subdued even more than OSH's. WPL would be smarter to make a slightly higher all cash bid, now, making the market think that's better when it certainly isn't by a long shot, unless oil never recovers!
At that point WPL would get hit a bit and that would be a great time to buy WPL!
Hony, I shrunk the share price
In the 1989 film Honey, I shrunk the kids, Rick Moranis' device inadvertently shrunk three unwitting children to the size of ants. An unfortunate confluence of poor capital deployment, overly zealous assumptions, and a fall in the oil price has seen Santos' share price (and valuations) shrink all too much. Today's $2.5bn equity raising, $520mn sale of
Kipper and $500mn placement to Hony Capital is Santos' attempt to stop the ship shrinking (and sinking). We certainly welcome a more pragmatic approach to the balance sheet.
This from Credit Suisse
We certainly welcome a more pragmatic approach to the balance sheet.
Do we. Is that what we do. Really?
I bought some before the take over offer which is probably a stooge to fatten up the price for the raising and I sold on the day the after the offer came in, so I'm fine but this? Credit Suisse? Comments add up to this -
'We welcome a capital raising at the absolute miserable bottom to destroy any holder who has bought in over the last 10 years. Credit Suisse are a joke. If oil and gas kick up in the next 2 years this will prove to be one of the worst moves ever. These people have no balls.
11th-December-2014
Reached the first support level much sooner than I thought today, and given the trajectory and how long left there is to play out, I've had to add further support levels and think the bottom one is not only in play after today, but has become the most likely.
STO $7.10, OIL $60
STO $5.80, OIL $55
STO $3.80, OIL $40
Happy to help.
So for Part 2:
Keeping it simple, Santos is FCF positive @ >$60 Oil. Oil is not this price. Santos will be losing money, Santos will need more money. Play it out, reach a conclusion in reality.
http://www.businessspectator.com.au...energy/six-santos-directors-buy-company-stock
Same reason another ex-CEO and board were buying stock at $7, the same month I forecast $3.80.
Same reason they denied a capital raise for an entire year.
People involved with a company have more biases than someone who looks clinically at the information.
Regardless, if a company is not profitable or cash flow positive, that's pretty much it for the foreseeable future.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?