- Joined
- 10 December 2013
- Posts
- 40
- Reactions
- 1
one wonders how this company ever made it to IPO stage...
one has to be careful of private equity opportunists.
That is the business model of private equity, they buy run down business where they can stripped out cost, ripped out asset they can sell like properties, land or part of the business for cash.
Draw out equity and replace it with debt then sell it back to the market for a juicy price
They bought Myer pretty much for nothing after they got all the inventories and sold their prime real estate
Yep. And it's known that PE sourced IPOs do much worse than other forms. In your view, why does the market get sucked into this stuff and pay over the odds?
How do you get in on the IPO? It keeps saying broker firm allocation...so which brokers offer it...such a noob sorry =/
Yep. And it's known that PE sourced IPOs do much worse than other forms. In your view, why does the market get sucked into this stuff and pay over the odds?
Didn't take very long after PEP's final sell down for this to join the club.Yep. And it's known that PE sourced IPOs do much worse than other forms.
Didn't take very long after PEP's final sell down for this to join the club.
Been rumours that they stripped out costs (good for short-term profits) but it certainly catches up with a company in the long-run when the cost base becomes unsustainable and those costs need to be added back in.
Yes agree, premarket I thought maybe it would fall back to the 180 level it was drifting around earlier in the year.The downgrade itself wasn't actually that bad (i.e. doesn't seem to warrant a 40% fall)....
Which was the conclusion I drew upon closing my small bounce trade for a loss.perhaps the market is running scared after DSH that they had been done by another PE dressed-for-sale business.
Yep, very possible. But when you say at the AGM barely a month ago "FY16 profits will be materially higher than FY15" (my paraphrasing) it doesn't look that great.The downgrade itself wasn't actually that bad (i.e. doesn't seem to warrant a 40% fall).... perhaps the market is running scared after DSH that they had been done by another PE dressed-for-sale business.
private equity bought it for $720m, and now offloading for $1.7 to $1.9bn, an increase of 150%.
I'd also argue failed bid costs aren't a one-off charge, they're a cost of business, and a sign of increased competition.
Ves said:If there are lower than expected synergies (possible it's just delayed however) their grow-by-acquisition strategy is doubtful. And it's really just a no-growth company, over-spending on acquisitions, with a pile of debt left to service.
Yep, very possible. But when you say at the AGM barely a month ago "FY16 profits will be materially higher than FY15" (my paraphrasing) it doesn't look that great.
I'd also argue failed bid costs aren't a one-off charge, they're a cost of business, and a sign of increased competition.
If there are lower than expected synergies (possible it's just delayed however) their grow-by-acquisition strategy is doubtful. And it's really just a no-growth company, over-spending on acquisitions, with a pile of debt left to service.
Also saying market conditions are getting tougher... does that mean this listed at above average cyclical earnings?
It's hard to say what price would do in the short-term, but seems fundamentally like there's a few doubts adding up now.
edit: Besides, given the large range of services this company offers, it seems like it'd be a real tangled web for anyone to manage as a whole.
Private equity holding something rearranging it according to what best cooks the book, usually with twice as much debt. Then offload it to filthy brokers to offer to their clients too busy to understand. There are no miracles behind the private equity curtain. A business does not double, triple or quadruple in value, in 18 months or what ever it takes for the public to forget what a peace of crap it was when it had to disclose everything as a public entity - whilst maintaining a model little different to what it was just a short time prior!
Is that hard to understand?
Market cap at $1.42 is still a demented 1.6 billion.
On August 30th, 2019, Spotless Group Holdings Limited (SPO) was removed from the ASX's Official List in accordance with Listing Rule 17.11, after security holders resolved to remove SPO from the Official List for the reasons set out in the company's announcement dated 25 June 2019.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?