My opinion is that you are better off learning ONE thing and doing it well rather than attempting multiple strategies all at once and messing them up.
If you only speak English and want to learn Japanese then that's all well and good. Trying to learn Chinese, French and German at the same time is going to make for one almighty confusion most likely...
Learn one thing first. The other markets will still be there tomorrow.
Further I would suggest that a noob and $1 k couldn't out perform a vet with $50k in a Year.( in % return) terms.
And with a half decent capital base you can have cumulative 1% winners and out perform the 50% winners.
No offence, watching this thread has been entertaining. It swung from the noobie seeking advice from the experienced to the noobie asserting what could and couldn't be done.
The proof is always in the pudding. As in business, the majority fail for lack of capitalisation and business acumen. Trading, whatever instrument you choose, is a full time career and not a part time hobby (Unless of course you are filthy rich and only do it for fun).
T/A is right, build up your $50k base then choose your weapon.
Wow.
"No offence, watching this thread has been entertaining. It swung from the noobie seeking advice from the experienced to the noobie asserting what could and couldn't be done. "
Just - wow.
Ok - I'm wrong. Nothing can be gained from playing the share market under 50K. All who invest under 50K, lose. Nulla-Nulla and T/A have established this with the utmost solidarity. Put your money in your pocket - leave trading for the BIG BOYS. My sincere condolences to those who have invested $49,990... Because we all know every single trader on Earth who ever made money started with 50K. No knowledge or experience, just 50K. They all had diverse portfolios when they started, because they had 50K. Found a very decent entry into a very cheap low cap with established growth potential? Don't have 50K? Then go to the TAB./sarc
It is as if I havent made myself clear. I understand the benifits of trading with a significanly larger base - they are obvious. But is it an absolute prerequisite? NO!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?