If silver maintains a price of above $30, the supply side reaction can be severe. Silver can be mined for an average cash cost of $10/oz.
Silver supply is certainly inelastic at the moment, as most of it is produced as a by product, but a medium term supply response is unavoidable if prices stay at these levels. There are numerous economical silver assets around the world which are not being developed because of the general uncertainty surrounding the silver price into the medium term (3-5 years).
You would have to be brave to start developing a silver mine today with a projected cash cost of $10/oz for production 2014. However if silver holds above $30 for another year or two investors may be willing to take the punt.
I agree with the idea that demand will increase with price. Silver has certainly enjoyed riding on the coattails of gold over the past few years however I question the assumption that is it a monetary store of value similar to gold.
In european culture silver has a monetary history but demand growth is coming from Asia, which has much less regard for silver than it does for gold. I would argue that most of the investment demand growth coming for silver is not because of the increasing status of precious metals vs fiat currencies in the current world economic outlook but simply punters out to make a buck in one of the few markets around currently in a strong upward trend.
I think you can look to price correlation with equities as proof that silver is very much a risk asset as opposed to a defensive asset. The spot price tanked very very hard (12% in day?) in the last equity market sell off and I would expect this correlation to continue.
Perhaps you are thinking on a much shorter time frame than myself Mr Z? What sort of market predictions are you making? If silver is supply and demand inelastic then what price do you believe equilibrium is at?
Lol, Mr Z is writing essays again.
PS -> I think that the general expectations of a free silver market are, shall we say, a little extreme. Freeing the market could produce a monster spike and crash that, ironically, could damage silver for years.
As global economic growth disintegrates so will the demand for base metals – which 70% of silver is a by-product. On top of that, silver ore grades are relentlessly falling in mines throughout the world which takes an increasing amount of energy just to keep production flat. If the mining industry tries to incorporate more human and animal labor to offset declining oil based energy in the future, it will do so only at much lower rates of production than today. This is due to the fact that human or animal labor cannot match the extraction rate of diesel powered excavators or huge dump trucks when it comes to mining silver.
Then there is the negative effect of a global depression on the production of silver. Presently the world has entered into tremendous chaos and economic turmoil. Conditions are ripe for a complete disintegration of the financial markets, thus pushing the world over the edge into a new dark age of hyperinflationary depression. In this sort of atmosphere, countries may resort to the nationalization of mines as well as other protectionist’s policies.
When the nails of the peak silver coffin are added up, the death of increasing future supply is close at hand. The CEO’s and analysts in the mining industry are for the most part oblivious to these factors that will destroy their ability to make viable forecasts of future projects. It amazes me to see professionals plan a huge open-pit mine with a 25-45 year economic plan without any consideration of what the energy environment will be like at that time. For some strange reason, there is this false assumption that “If we build it, the energy will come.”
In european culture silver has a monetary history but demand growth is coming from Asia, which has much less regard for silver than it does for gold.
True, but this is not to say that the silver standard was superior. As economies developed in the West, there was a default movement away from the silver standard and towards the gold standard (until the later was destroyed by politicians). This is due to the increasing transaction volumes that accompany economic growth giving gold the edge (higher 'value density'), and the higher inflation rate of silver (easier and more voluminous mining) making it a lesser quality money.The word for bank in Chinese, Japanese and Korean is 銀行: [銀] means silver (not gold!), and [行] means movement, or circulation - the idea being that a bank is a place to trade silver.
China was the last country to leave the silver standard in 1935.
It's easy to make the argument that silver has a stronger and more recent history as a monetary metal in East Asia than anywhere in the West.
True, but this is not to say that the silver standard was superior. As economies developed in the West, there was a default movement away from the silver standard and towards the gold standard (until the later was destroyed by politicians). This is due to the increasing transaction volumes that accompany economic growth giving gold the edge (higher 'value density'), and the higher inflation rate of silver (easier and more voluminous mining) making it a lesser quality money.
The same forces would have, and did, applied to the East. Japan moved to the gold standard as soon as it could (although this was partially due to the desire to access credit from Europe).
It's easy to make the argument that silver has a stronger and more recent history as a monetary metal in East Asia than anywhere in the West.
Well bro you can not eat silver. Depression coming to a store near you. Go the greedy people enjoy your day out lol
This sort of thing has been said every time the price of silver has taken a tumble
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?