This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

SDV - SciDev Limited

Jump to new

Yes fair enough. Their big move however came on the 23rd February 2007, the day Jaguar Nickel announced that they were going to become a merchant bank and invest in undervalued stock.

I would have known nothing about Jaguar Nickel (Canada) except for INLs constant referrfals to them on their webpage and PDFs.

INL either want to be Jaguar or they want to compete with Jaguar worldwide. Jaguar however earn $100-250m P/A, and JRV could bring INL that type of income if only they would agree to play ball.

Unfortunately experimental Nickel laterite techniques still leave a bad taste in investor mouths, and maybe, just maybe JRV think this kind of association might scare off the Chinese.

But who knows ....

Just MHO - But please DYOR, or at least read the stock webpages.
 
Atomic5 said:
Yes fair enough. Their big move however came on the 23rd February 2007, the day Jaguar Nickel announced that they were going to become a merchant bank and invest in undervalued stock..
Click to expand...

I note you make constant referral to that coincidence as being planned. Conspiracy theories shouldn't be passed off as fact.


JRV have had plenty of time to use the Jaguar process, they have not done so. The reason is that it was probably bound to fail, casting doubt on the viability of that process globally.

The INLP is one of the babies of the INL stable of processes. A minor process. INL wanting to be Jaguar? No they want to be INL. Jaguar only have one process.


Atomic5 said:
Just MHO - But please DYOR, or at least read the stock webpages.
Click to expand...

Perhaps before telling me to educate myself on this stock, you need to read back through the thread.
 
JRV dont have the money.

& its not conspiracy, it's just plain old business. Gees you sound hurt.

Cheers.

Just MHO - Please DYOR
 
Atomic5 said:
& its not conspiracy, it's just plain old business.
Click to expand...

It is opinion, nothing more (the work of an overactive imagination). It is irresponsible to portray it as anything else.

Hurt feelings? No just little tolerance for those who don't research.
 
Atomic5 said:
& its not conspiracy, it's just plain old business. Gees you sound hurt.
Click to expand...
Yep. People on this thread are massively defensive. People have lost a lot of money on hopes and dreams.
 
Not me, have made heaps and will make heaps more. Read back through the thread and you'll see my buy points. All recorded there for you to see.

Most people who bag stocks with no fundamental backing (other than referring to charts) are TA traders who have been burnt. They haven't learnt to move on. It happens a lot on sites such as HC. I thought ASF was different. Apparently not.

Does that describe you Chops?
 
Lets not let this get personal guys.

How about you both just agree to disagree and we can let this thread move forward in a more constructive way?
 
Nope.

It is disappointing when you can't provide an alternative view to a blatant ramp without being called a "myopic wa*ker".

Fundamental or not, you still HAVE to pick an entry and an exit. And this hasn't given an entry for a long long time. There is also disagreement on the fundamentals, and just because people may disagree with you, aren't thinking along the same lines as you, it does not mean that they have not done any research.

Ignore different points of view at your peril. This one has had alarm bells ringing since December and they haven't stopped. And a boardroom playing schoolyard tactics, why woud you want to be a part of it?
 
chops_a_must said:
Yep. People on this thread are massively defensive. People have lost a lot of money on hopes and dreams.
Click to expand...

INTEC like any other company or business would be aware of of global events and changes in their field of business and research.

There is nothing personal about that at all.

 
chops_a_must said:
Fundamental or not, you still HAVE to pick an entry and an exit.
Click to expand...

Yes, but the exit point is certainly not there yet. It will come when the fundamentals change. As I see it, they are only getting stronger.

My entry points were along time ago.
 
chops_a_must said:
So if you agree no one should be buying now and so do I, what is the problem?
Click to expand...

you should have known what I meant, by the smiley afterwards. I have since edited it because you didn't understand or purposely misquoted me for the sake of your own view.
 
Atomic5 said:
I agree.

but ... Just my MHO - Please DYOR
Click to expand...

That is business. Paladin are a recent example. I'm very happy to be associated with them too.
 
Why haven't they peddled their processes to BHP over the last 2 years?

BHP have been building a $2.2bn (expensive!) Nickel refinery in Ravensthorpe since 2004, and are currently desperate to get their Nickel refinery into production in order to take advantage of current nickel prices.

Delays have been partly due to lack of expert personnel so much so that they too will need to go overseas and get them.

Just MHO - Please DYOR.
 
KIWIKARLOS said:
Have any of their processes been commercially proven yet?
Click to expand...
Not sure if it's been reported in the past few days but the BDP plant did mostly operate to specifications but is now being reviewed in a Feasability Study with the assistance of WOR to determine if it's commercially viable. This report is supposed to be out very soon. Check back through their previous anns for more detail on this.
 
Which process did this plant test, don't they have a whole range of processes for different metals each requiring the types of feasability tests your referring to.

Would be good to hear some news of a successfull Zinc and nickel process.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

RNV - ReNerve Limited
Replies
1
Views
443
Dona Ferentes
TME - Tungsten Metals Group
Replies
1
Views
945
Dona Ferentes
VFY - Vitrafy Life Sciences
Replies
5
Views
836
TrevorB
T
SYL - Symal Group
Replies
2
Views
724
Dona Ferentes
EM8 - Everlast Minerals
Replies
2
Views
633
peter2
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...