- Joined
- 7 December 2006
- Posts
- 254
- Reactions
- 0
Gundini said:You would have to think it a positive prospect. INL already holding 10% JRV stock at an average of 1.6 cents I think, so they have doubled their money either way. The speculative premium was built into JRV last week at 4.1, so they shouldn't get hurt at current prices of .3... I doubt there would be a takeover, a win/win deal more likely IMO. Figure if INL and JRV do a deal with the Nickel, and it's procesing, both stock should increase in value. If the deal is canned, there shouldn't be any downside, as no current premium is built into either price as they stand.
I hold INL, and will be buying some JRV tomorrow. All's good IMO, not much risk!
DYOR
nizar said:Fundamentals and growth potential DOES NOT make you money.
juddy said:That would have to be the funniest statement I have seen on any investment website. It was a joke right????? Gawd, I hope so.
wintermute said:I also noticed this morning some unusual trades... first signs of bot trading on INL maybe??
Time Price Volume Value Conditions Attributes BuyXRef SellXRef
08/03/2007 10:35:47 0.205 62996 12914.18 G
08/03/2007 10:35:47 0.2 37000 7400.00 F
08/03/2007 10:35:47 0.2 4 0.80 F
08/03/2007 10:28:31 0.2 30000 6000.00 G
08/03/2007 10:26:50 0.2 19996 3999.20 G
08/03/2007 10:26:50 0.2 30004 6000.80 F
08/03/2007 10:21:54 0.2 9996 1999.20 G
08/03/2007 10:21:54 0.2 4 0.80 F
why would anyone in their right mind sell (or is it buy) only 4 shares??? admittedly they were part of an overall bigger trade but in both cases it started with just 4 shares!
Tony.
F = Buy Partial FillGurgler said:What do the G and F mean - a buy and sell reference? In which case???
imajica said:should be an interesting day with PW telling Jervois how things will be!
INL has got the goods to unlock a previously uneconomic very large resource
why would INL purchase nearly 20% of JRV if they didn't have a high level of certainty that their process could be used on the deposit
Good luck INL holders, we are not gonna need it
imajica said:should be an interesting day with PW telling Jervois how things will be!
INL has got the goods to unlock a previously uneconomic very large resource
why would INL purchase nearly 20% of JRV if they didn't have a high level of certainty that their process could be used on the deposit
Good luck INL holders, we are not gonna need it
imajica said:should be an interesting day with PW telling Jervois how things will be!
INL has got the goods to unlock a previously uneconomic very large resource
why would INL purchase nearly 20% of JRV if they didn't have a high level of certainty that their process could be used on the deposit
Good luck INL holders, we are not gonna need it
champ2003 said:PW? What or who is PW?
INL have an 11.66% holding in JRV not 20%.
Champ
imajica said:chops, I must admit you are sounding a little desperate ramping those dog stocks!!!! INL has 3-4 billion in tailings resource alone at Hellyer + a s**tload of other projects - chops, nizar etc if you don't like INL why bother posting then - stick to the other threads
Atomic5 said:Perhaps JRV sees them as wanting to jump on the JRV bandwagon for the benefit of INL, seeing as the Chinese have no shortage of funds
juddy said:It's amusing when TA traders start referring to fundamentals to get others in.
I'm not a T/A trader.imajica said:chops, I must admit you are sounding a little desperate ramping those dog stocks!!!! INL has 3-4 billion in tailings resource alone at Hellyer + a s**tload of other projects - chops, nizar etc if you don't like INL why bother posting then - stick to the other threads
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?