Schu, you must be on drugs when you say some one can look at a TV, and tell that drug is not the same as mine. After reading your post some people would think that Tony could have had some thing to do with it. Why would any one ask him about the drugs the Corby mule was caught with???. And Schu,, dad was good friends with tony, why would you move so for and buy the farm next door if would was not mates. Schu/Zacko, the hole you are digging is so deep be careful the sides don't fall in.
most of us who do not have a crush on corby believe she is guilty by the overhwleming evidence against her and by common sense.
we dont belive we are sick or twisted. just normal raitonal individuals.
about half the pot smokers on the coast have bought their green off her family over the years.
There is no overwhelming evidence. There isn't a semblance of a tenable case against her. That is the whole point. This is what Schu, and others with the capacity to think for themselves, are well aware of. It is why it will not be allowed to lie.
There is a show trial, in which her human rights were systematically abused. There is a political/racist sentence. There is a media campaign to opinion manage the public (fooling the less intellectually inclined to believe that smear is somehow 'evidence').
There is also terrible suffering and misery. And there is a set of people demonstrably deriving satisfaction and pleasure from this.
Of course you are. This is how you normal rational individuals post, repeatedly, day after day:
Originally Posted by knocker:
How sad she is locked in a cage lol maybe she is vying for an acting career. Or maybe she had a rough night with the wardens.
Originally Posted by pilots
You lame ducks can cry all you like, I would suggest that you stock up on tears, you will need them, as you still have 16 YEARS TO GO.
Originally Posted by Calliope
Hopefully Corby won't be able to corrupt the gene pool while she is incarcerated. So that's a plus.
To sustain that sickness you spin around and around with same smears and lies, ignoring the abuses which are documented and which are presented to you. It always comes back to some neighbor or relative or someone who once smoked a bit of dope. Pathetic.
This low-grade low-IQ tabloid rag gossip is a million miles from 'evidence' and is irrelevant to the REAL issues of human rights abuse, political/racist sentencing, and corrupt manipulation of public opinion.
If you are not bright enough, or are too twisted, to see this, that is your problem. It doesn't alter the facts. Does your mother and family know about your online campaign to hurt this suffering woman by the way?
Incidentally, the pertinent section on the media video starts at 2:01:
That part explains the smears you continually post. It explains where you got them from, and how they were inserted into your feeble mind as though they were somehow 'evidence'.
Yep: that pretty much defines an unsubstantiated smear and a lie. Proud of yourself for that one?
Originally Posted by Calliope
"Hopefully Corby won't be able to corrupt the gene pool while she is incarcerated. So that's a plus."
To sustain that sickness you spin around and around with same smears and lies, ignoring the abuses which are documented and which are presented to you. It always comes back to some neighbor or relative or someone who once smoked a bit of dope. Pathetic.
Hi Everyone,
I just joined the forum. I have been working in the prisoner advocacy field for the last 7 years, since my own unlawful detainment in Laos. I'm happy to discuss issues on the Corby case if you would like, having also been involved in this particular case personally.
Cheers,
Kay Danes
International Humanitarian
www.foreignprisoners.com
www.kaydanes.com
hello agentm
At the onset of her case, I believe she did not receive the best legal advice according to her situation.
The facts of the matter regardless of innocence or guilt, is that she was detained with a large quantity of marijuana in her possession. She couldn't prove that it did not belong to her. The prosecutor couldn't prove that it did but anyone who has ever had any dealings with the Indonesian justice system knows that regardless of, burden of proof, [the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) clearly states that the burden of proof rests with the prosecution,] it's just that with accuseds who have limited political and monetary bargaining power, this provision isn't applied in practice in Indonesia.
So Schapelle was destined to be found guilty unless she could prove otherwise that the drugs did not belong to her.
Had she had good legal negotiators/advisors, then perhaps the length of the sentence would not have been so severe.
I think the question should be more about whether or not she had access to proper and appropriate legal counsel in order to be properly represented? I don't think she did and this is something that concerns me, as millions of Australians travel overseas each year and at least 750 find themselves requiring consular support/assistance.
Everyone should be entitled to proper representation and not what we've seen with the Corby case.
I find it hard to believe that ½ of the pot smokers on the coast get their supply from the Corby family, yet the police have nothing on them. Don’t you think that if this many people relied on them as their supplier that someone would have been more than happy to blow the whistle on the supposed operation, ending the debate once and for all? The Corby family doesn’t have anything to do with selling marijuana. This is just another unsubstantiated rumor that is run as part of a smear campaign, in which you only continue the viscous cycle of lies.about half the pot smokers on the coast have bought their green off her family over the years...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?