- Joined
- 3 April 2021
- Posts
- 32
- Reactions
- 19
Thanks. Well I have some money in spaceship app and thinking of adding the kids money to thisThere are no real ways of growing a small account without taking some risk.
But your risk should be quantified. ( Learn how to quantify risk )
If it was me I’d be looking for an opportunity in a small cap with growth potential
i was noticing Coal in Iron ore stock were on the move.
Im. Builder so a far cry from a financial planner.
Just one observation
You’ve got a lot of years to achieve what you want
if you get really good at this the cash will be hard to resist
speaking from experience!
You mean compounding as in I should put it in investments. I feel spaceship is safe and cheap!compounding ... 8th wonder of the world.
Sure but I am time poor. Two young kids, I work full time, at uni full time (doing a master's in my professional profession) a wife and a house to maintain. I see a managed fund at perfect option for people like me.. no?Just another managed fund with corresponding fees.
your delegating responsibility,time .
If you want exceptional return you’ll have to do something exceptional.
Same,Same returns ——same same.
Hi Ben,Howdy!
I have a two year old and four year old. They both have a combined savings of $1300. I have been putting away approx. 2-10 bucks a week away for them since they were born.
I have recently invested some of my personal money into a micro-investing SV
The bank account that my kids money is in earns little to no interest and i wonder if these is a better strategy to get them more money in the long run. Should i add it into my spaceship voyager account or put it somewhere else? I am currently to date putting $10 a week for each child, so $20 a week and plan to keep doing so.
My plan for their savings is to give it to them when they are 16-18 or so and contribute to buying a car, uni education bills or something.
Cheers
This also leads me to believe a completely hands off dollar cost averaging into an index fund or Berkshire Hathaway is your best approach.Sure but I am time poor. Two young kids, I work full time, at uni full time (doing a master's in my professional profession) a wife and a house to maintain. I see a managed fund at perfect option for people like me.. no?
It’s better to buy assets that will have similar inflation hedge to gold, but that also throw off cashflow that can be used to build up more assets.Nobody mention gold? looking back at last 10-20 years gold has some good returns, if not just a hedge against inflation
Yes one share in Berkshire will still be one share, how ever that 1 share will represent a claim on a much larger pile of underlying assets as Berkshire continue to buy more investments while also buying back shares.It seems like in the last 20 years Berkshire increased around 5x in price Gold has increased around 4x in price. 1 share of Berkshire will always be 1 share since you receive no dividends just like 1oz of gold will always be 1oz of gold seems like a fair comparison
Do you have a suggestion on what company to use for an index fund? Is vanguard one?I’m with @Value Collector
For what you want to do, set and forget investing, I’m a fan of indexing.
Unless you have convictions (eg a value fund that you like) I suggest going broad global. I’m practically a shill these days on this forum, for Vanguard high growth fund (life strategy it used to be called, and may still be). For specific reasons of not requiring you to do anything about rebalancing etc.
If you prefer more asset classes or more Aussie heavy, for example, you’d have to start taking responsibility for the balancing of your investments. That would be next level active, from pure passive. Anything else logically requires you to have a reason to do it. But you’ll always get bizarre suggestions, including on this forum, from those who don’t really have the ability to see outside their own circumstances or convictions.
Sorry, 5 x $400,000 is $2,000,000 not $2,400,000... maybe I shouldn’t do math after midnight hahahaYes one share in Berkshire will still be one share, how ever that 1 share will represent a claim on a much larger pile of underlying assets as Berkshire continue to buy more investments while also buying back shares.
where as that ounce of gold will still only represent they same underlying number of atoms of metal.
55 years ago you could have chosen either 1 ounce of gold or 5 Berkshire shares for the same price.
Today that ounce of gold is worth about $1,750 US dollars which is a good inflation hedge, however the Berkshire shares are now worth $400,000 each and you would have got 5 of them = $2,400,000
Compounding is a really good thing long term, unfortunately gold doesn’t grow, it just sits there.
as I said if you want a strictly low risk inflation hedge, buy gold but if you also want an investment return, by a real investment.
Any decent one that you like or that your advisor recommends. But what my post refers to is vanguard life strategy. Just take a look at it, it may or may not suit. All it does is give global equity cheaply and conveniently, that’s my point.Do you have a suggestion on what company to use for an index fund? Is vanguard one?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?