Porper
Ralph Nelson Elliott
- Joined
- 11 August 2004
- Posts
- 1,413
- Reactions
- 274
Ann said:Hi Laurie,
Most of the analysts look at a stock's potential and build a price to the future growth of a company. I find it a very encouraging sign whenever I see a smaller stock honour the 200dEMA. This appears to have just happened to RPT. Overall, most speccie companies don't react to this EMA.
...and of course, the chart!!
Porper said:I am not contradicting you Ann, but the tools we use are all subjective.
Using anything other than a 200 day MA wouldn't make the chart look quite so good.I use ADX crossovers as part of my scans and this is why RPT came up.Totally agree most indicators are looking better, but the lack of volume would stop me buying in yet.
Ann said:Hi Porper,
I agree about tools being subjective, in fact I feel charting is an extremely subjective tool in itself. I can take a chart and with a few strategically placed lines and certain indicators, I can make it look as though it is the worst dog stock or the biggest potential bargain in the world!
The reason I choose to view Australian stocks with the 200dEMA is because this is with which the All Ordinaries XAO reacts the best. To me it is the main support line valued by institutions and traders. Volume will only happen after the stock has taken off. At this stage of the stocks life, I would have expected the majority of the funds and institutions would well and truly be in, so no volume spikes are likely.
Porper said:I understand that your aim (If you were to buy RPT) is to get in before the rise in volume, and subsequently the rise in price.I am a bit more defensive in that I don't mind losing a part of the trend if I get the confirmation first.Each to their own though.
Ann said:I don't buy mining stocks so I wouldn't enter at any point!
Best
Ann
Ann said:Oh dear Laurie,
Trust you to ask the hard questions......
If I answered, the greeny in me might start ooooozing out! Not a pretty sight. Can get a bit shrill. Didn't you notice my tirade about Uranium on the Uranium thread a few posts from the beginning on {shares.com.au} shhhh, that's naughty to flick people to another forum...still you live at Shares sometimes, don't you sweetheart? As do a lot of the people who post here. They just use different names.
Ann
PS Go on Aussiestock Mods, feel free to flick a post of mine sooner or later!!! I promise I will keep posting here,even if you do. There is a prat in the ether who would probably say I am an exhibitionist, not true. I just want to share what I find with as many people as I can. I just don't have the time to regurgitate everything I write elsewhere.
Ann said:Oh dear Laurie,
Trust you to ask the hard questions......
If I answered, the greeny in me might start ooooozing out! Not a pretty sight. Can get a bit shrill. [/SIZE]
I think the uranium ban in WA is the ALP policy (I believe that applies to a few other states as well), not just Geoff Gallop himself. Don't get excited yet.laurie said:Breaking news Geoff Gallop has resign as W.A. premier while the reason is a health matter its a 50:50 bet which way the replacement treats Uranium mining!
cheers laurie
NT nuclear waste dump gets thumbs up
Date: 29/11/05
The Northern Territory will be forced to accept a nuclear waste dump after a government-dominated Senate committee recommended it go ahead.
After just one day of public hearings, a Senate committee majority has backed the government's plans to override NT laws preventing a radioactive waste dump there.
The Commonwealth Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2005 and the Commonwealth Radioactive Waste Management (Related Amendments) Bill 2005 give the federal government sweeping powers to override a range of laws, including any passed by the NT government that might frustrate the project.
Despite opposition from Aboriginal land owners, the NT government, environment groups and Labor, the laws look set to pass the Senate before the end of the year.
Balance of article at this link......
http://seven.com.au/news/nationalnews/124966
Despite opposition from Aboriginal land owners, the NT government, environment groups and Labor, the laws look set to pass the Senate before the end of the year.
Despite opposition from the Federal Liberal Party,NT Country Liberal Party,Mining Council Of Australia the laws are set to pass the Senate as the nuclear waste dump is outside the Labor "3 Hole Policy"
Ann said:Hi BraceFace,
It sounds like you have been reading me on the other forum [which may not be mentioned] I named a few posts back on this thread.
You didn't read far enough back into the thread about accepting Nuclear waste. It's old news now but I will catch you guys up on it here.
Ann said:Sorry BraceFace,
From your reaction you must have thought I sounded 'uppy'. It was only last night I was doing my greeny carry on and you appeared to be quoting all my points against Uranium from that particular thread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?