New posts

Reply to thread

Message

no problem tech/a

At least you can't blame me for this thread starting to go round in circles as I haven't posted anything more on how I handle risk since very early in the thread - and only touched on a side topic, paper losses, recently

All I did in my previous thread was give my reasons for where I see this thread heading and highlight to those interested that there is much better quality info on risk management on the www than what is being currently discussed in here

If you want to be taken seriously you'll have to prove anything I said is wrong in my previous thread and then start posting some algorithms and examples for actually calculating risk - otherwise, as I said, everyone will be staring at their own navels in this thread soon wondering what the hell they are looking at and what it all means

Good luck in your discussions but there hasn't been anything significantly new posted since stevo's first post and so it appears you're running out of steam.

cheers

bullmarket

<blockquote data-quote="bullmarket" data-source="post: 37853" data-attributes="member: 2453">no problem tech/a <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />At least you can&#039;t blame me for this thread starting to go round in circles as I haven&#039;t posted anything more on how I handle risk since very early in the thread - and only touched on a side topic, paper losses, recentlyAll I did in my previous thread was give my reasons for where I see this thread heading and highlight to those interested that there is much better quality info on risk management on the www than what is being currently discussed in here <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />If you want to be taken seriously you&#039;ll have to prove anything I said is wrong in my previous thread and then start posting some algorithms and examples for actually calculating risk - otherwise, as I said, everyone will be staring at their own navels in this thread soon wondering what the hell they are looking at and what it all means&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> Good luck in your discussions but there hasn&#039;t been anything significantly new posted since stevo&#039;s first post and so it appears you&#039;re running out of steam.cheersbullmarket <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="bullmarket, post: 37853, member: 2453"] no problem tech/a :) At least you can't blame me for this thread starting to go round in circles as I haven't posted anything more on how I handle risk since very early in the thread - and only touched on a side topic, paper losses, recently All I did in my previous thread was give my reasons for where I see this thread heading and highlight to those interested that there is much better quality info on risk management on the www than what is being currently discussed in here ;) If you want to be taken seriously you'll have to prove anything I said is wrong in my previous thread and then start posting some algorithms and examples for actually calculating risk - otherwise, as I said, everyone will be staring at their own navels in this thread soon wondering what the hell they are looking at and what it all means :D Good luck in your discussions but there hasn't been anything significantly new posted since stevo's first post and so it appears you're running out of steam. cheers bullmarket :) [/QUOTE]

Verification