New posts

Reply to thread

Message

Sorry if it is offensive - at least I didn't swear this time

But surely an alternative view is required sometimes and I am happy to live by my opinions. I certainly get paid from them.

Shorting RIO at $66 (three days before the bottom) due to using a narrow method I believe is voodoo lost lots of money. Shorting RIO on a questionable fundamental analysis like Ducati's, in my view, is also not going to make money.

. My disagreement has nothing to do with fundamental versus technical

Plenty of funny stuff goes unquestioned on the forum and I would like to provide an alternative view point. Plenty of people also get bagged on here for various ideas - particularly those requiring the opening of a quartely production report or buying a company that actually has earnings.

Go to the CDU thread and check out some of the really well researched and backed-up rubbish I have been exposed too. I got called a commie FFS!

Nobody gets it right all the time and hindsight is 100% but an alternative view should always be accepted. My points of view during the time in question are as public as the next guy's. Sometimes I think that if you learnt all you know about stocks from this forum you wouldn't have a stock in your portfolio that actually made money.

If someone wants to say that buying BHP and RIO at 9 times earnings is foolish when they are cum-upgrades is voodoo or rubbish or dumb or silly I am happy to hear why. You and me have had some excellent discussions...

I am not so precious to be concerned by someone disagreeing with me. I think I learn more by being in discussions where not everyone is thinking the same.

Is RIO still going to $50?

If not - why not and what has changed since Sept apart from the chart?

<blockquote data-quote="BSD" data-source="post: 81327" data-attributes="member: 3246">Sorry if it is offensive - at least I didn&#039;t swear this timeBut surely an alternative view is required sometimes and I am happy to live by my opinions. I certainly get paid from them.Shorting RIO at $66 (three days before the bottom) due to using a narrow method I believe is voodoo lost lots of money.&nbsp; Shorting RIO on a questionable fundamental analysis like Ducati&#039;s, in my view, is also not going to make money. . My disagreement has nothing to do with fundamental versus technicalPlenty of funny stuff goes unquestioned on the forum and I would like to provide an alternative view point. Plenty of people also get bagged on here for various ideas - particularly those requiring the opening of a quartely production report or buying a company that actually has earnings. Go to the CDU thread and check out some of the really well researched and backed-up rubbish I have been exposed too. I got called a commie FFS!Nobody gets it right all the time and hindsight is 100% but an alternative view should always be accepted. My points of view during the time in question are as public as the next guy&#039;s. Sometimes I think that if you learnt all you know about stocks from this forum you wouldn&#039;t have a stock in your portfolio that actually made money.If someone wants to say that buying BHP and RIO at 9 times earnings is foolish when they are cum-upgrades is voodoo or rubbish or dumb or silly I am happy to hear why. You and me have had some excellent discussions...I am not so precious to be concerned by someone disagreeing with me. I think I learn more by being in discussions where not everyone is thinking the same. Is RIO still going to $50?If not - why not and what has changed since Sept apart from the chart?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BSD, post: 81327, member: 3246"] Sorry if it is offensive - at least I didn't swear this time But surely an alternative view is required sometimes and I am happy to live by my opinions. I certainly get paid from them. Shorting RIO at $66 (three days before the bottom) due to using a narrow method I believe is voodoo lost lots of money. Shorting RIO on a questionable fundamental analysis like Ducati's, in my view, is also not going to make money. [B]. My disagreement has nothing to do with fundamental versus technical[/B] Plenty of funny stuff goes unquestioned on the forum and I would like to provide an alternative view point. Plenty of people also get bagged on here for various ideas - particularly those requiring the opening of a quartely production report or buying a company that actually has earnings. Go to the CDU thread and check out some of the really well researched and backed-up rubbish I have been exposed too. I got called a commie FFS! Nobody gets it right all the time and hindsight is 100% but an alternative view should always be accepted. My points of view during the time in question are as public as the next guy's. Sometimes I think that if you learnt all you know about stocks from this forum you wouldn't have a stock in your portfolio that actually made money. If someone wants to say that buying BHP and RIO at 9 times earnings is foolish when they are cum-upgrades is voodoo or rubbish or dumb or silly I am happy to hear why. You and me have had some excellent discussions... I am not so precious to be concerned by someone disagreeing with me. I think I learn more by being in discussions where not everyone is thinking the same. Is RIO still going to $50? If not - why not and what has changed since Sept apart from the chart? [/QUOTE]

Verification