Well I'm a little different to PAV
I don't need to know anything.
Meanwhile, although he keeps pushing the line that something can't come from nothing (which I happen to agree with), he apparently thinks that the god he believes in came from nothing.
Either that, or like many people who can't explain how this god was created, he'll tell us that god 'always was'.
GB – For once I’ve actually read one of your long posts in its entirety.
These wild beliefs are nonsense, and just like the power of prayer, if you asked for a demonstration to support them, you’d get nothing.
I acknowledge that you’re not presenting these views as fact, but rather have posted them for the interest of the forum.
The Buddhists have some pretty far out beliefs – a relative whose converted to Buddhism once showed me a booklet they put out about the nine (or is it ten) different hells that await sinners after we depart this life.
It was so crazy that I formed the view that you’d just about have to be off your head to believe it. Do a Google search on it if you’re interested.
There is such a convenient blind leap of logic and rationality to go from
...things exist...I wonder how it all works....to god created everything..to I know the 'truth' ..Jesus rose from the dead....and I have a relationship with god and my morality is very superior to yours because things are written in ancient manuscripts.
The way the avid religious dismiss counter arguments really leaves no room for further discussion. Not because they have proven their points beyond refutation but because they make a series of assumptions within closed paradigms that serve to support each other..and because there is a deeply held ( and probably coached (by parents, church, conservative elements in society etc)) desire to believe in the ultimate universal force that will look after them in life and death ....and at a different level to be able to fit in with general community bents along these lines...ie access to community support and for reasons of political expedience.
Seems to me there are few completely honest, untainted stances on such things..but one is..I dont know so lets get on with living this life well.
They're not presented as beliefs, but facts. Whether they are facts or not, I have no idea, but I tend to agree you might wait a long time trying to find someone who can perform such feats.
Science can tell us, for example, that life on earth stemmed from some cell or some organism, but they can’t tell us how that cell or organism was created.
The ingredients for life are spread all across our Solar System and indeed the Universe. They include mundane and ordinary chemicals, like ammonia, methanol and carbon dioxide.
Now new research has shown that all you need to turn these boring chemicals into amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, is a shockwave. Specifically, the kind of shockwaves you get when a comet crashes into a planet.
Understanding how life began is a tricky business, to say the least. Researchers across the world are using various approaches to figure out the different ways in which the complex molecules we find in living organisms are formed from more simple molecules found throughout the Universe. This team in Denmark, for example, is using computer modelling to understand the myriad chemical pathways involved with hydrogen cyanide.
In 2010, Nir Goldman of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California hypothesised that comet impacts could be one way for pre-life compounds, known as prebiotic compounds, to be synthesised. The mechanism was considered by some to be "unlikely", he noted in the paper's abstract, due to "the high heat from impact", among other things.
His computer model has now been supported by experimental research, in which samples of ice mimicking the composition of comets were shot with a projectile travelling 7.1 kilometres a second. By recreating a cometary impact, the researchers, including Goldman, were able to produce amino acids like those found in bacterial cell walls.
"We know that when a [cometary] impact occurs, it happens at an extremely high speed," says Zita Martins of Imperial College London, lead author of the study published in Nature Geoscience. "The temperature and pressure is huge [so] molecular bonds break and you generate more complex molecules."
An icy mixture containing dissolved ammonia, methanol and carbon dioxide was placed in a gas gun at the University of Kent. Projectiles were then fired at the mixture, with amino acids only being produced when an impact occurred and when all three of the components were present.
"It's basically the compounds that you find at the beginning of the Solar System," notes Martins. In the early Solar System, comets would have been impacting the Earth and other planets like giant cataclysmic balls of hail.
I'm not in any way weighing into the discussion on evolution, but I've read differently regarding human height over the centuries.I remember seeing footage of Jack Dempsey being mobbed by hundreds of fans a few weeks after he became the world heavyweight boxing champion in 1919. Jack stood 6 feet 1 inch tall, and he towered over just about all of his fans. Today a man of that height doesn’t even stand out from the crowd.
Scientists are getting closer to creating the building blocks of life from just smashing rocks together.
No, I haven’t read anything to the contrary.I'm not in any way weighing into the discussion on evolution, but I've read differently regarding human height over the centuries.
My understanding is that human height in certain areas of the world is in a constant state of flux that is influenced by all sorts of factors. Racial miscegenation, cultural practices of the time, economic factors of the time etc. Nutritional factors of the time are especially important. Have a look at some of the studies done on those countries that have experienced sustained famines and see how this effects the average height of the population there.
Compare the average height of the populations of the West in the mid-1800s when Industrialisation was starting to peak and the conditions prevalent in this rapid growth period vs those of today.
There's plenty of stuff around the web on this subject if you're interested.
Not sure if this helps:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-are-we-getting-taller
Have you read anything to the contrary on this subject?
Just as a brief outline. They were written in the lifetime of eye witnesses and two accounts by eye witnesses. Also the empty tomb. Also this was not a myth that developed over time, it has no time to. It was written in the lifetime of eye witnesses who would dispute any lies.
When God created the butterfly, did he create the egg? Or did he create the butterfly?
Of course – my wife and I have implored our daughters to avoid taking unnecessary risks like that. And they don’t.Bunyip, I know she was going to work in the CBD but taking a short cut through a park at 4am which would have been dark and deserted of decent people seems a dangerous thing to do, IMO. Would you be concerned if your daughter did the same?
I blame the vermin who bashed her to death, and the girl herself bears some responsibility for her fate by taking such a silly risk.God gave us brains and my belief is that he expects us to use them to make sensible decisions. If I stood in front of a speeding train would you also blame God when I was knocked down? Being a Christian doesn't mean we can put ourselves into potentially dangerous situations and then blame God for not protecting us.
Don't get me wrong in that I am sickened at this girl's brutal death and in a perfect world she should be able to walk safely through a deserted park before dawn.
My Christian upbringing taught that God is always there to help us and take care of us if we believe in him. I know now that he’s not, but that’s what I was taught and it’s what I believed before my experience of life taught me otherwise.
My beef with Christianity is that it makes so many false promises that just don’t stack up. One of these is the myth about the caring and compassionate God.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?