Reduced sentences

crackaton · 25 March 2006

wayneL said:
To use a liberal paraphrasing of an oft quoted passage in one widely read tome: I have noticed that often "the first to cast stones" are not necessarily those "without sin".

Just an observation

lol I admit it I am an axe murderer. i have more tatts than you can poke a stick at, and I'm coming to get you!!

TheAnalyst · 25 March 2006

yer...its a tough subject i just dont think i have the capacity or the qualifications or experience to cast judgement.

I think at this stage there are other members of society who are qualified for this thing and it probally be best left up to them to handle it and you may have relatives who have and i dont think they would advertise it to you especially if they know of your views that they may have committed crimes.

I was also thinking about how you believed it would be good for these fellows to be raped in jail but that would be committing the same crime as what they committed and how could the authorities overlook such a ghastly crime no matter who the victims were, its like you believe society should allow itself to be lowered to their shocking acts ourselves. I would not want the authorities to turn a blind eye to this behaviour because that would also make me a partaker indirectly to the same crime that they committed and i would not want myself incriminated in that.....as i would be involved in raping as well and you to crackaton so society could not do that either or itself to would be a rapist a sodomy rapist and to get some one to do its evil work and turn a blind eye and at the same time have rape criminalised would be hypocrisy.

I just see now why it is best to the those in our society to handle the justice system and i can now see why judges donot like th emedia getting involved or influencing their judgements because the media are known to never print or publicise the whole story and at times they have printed only what they want us to hear.

The mark latham story recently is a prime example they followed his kids around to hungry jacks and just would not leave him alone so he smashed the camera and the reporter which was a crime but for the life of me why wasnt it a crime for the photographer to be charged for stalking the poor bloke and his children.

crackaton · 25 March 2006

TheAnalyst said:
yer...its a tough subject i just dont think i have the capacity or the qualifications or experience to cast judgement.

I think at this stage there are other members of society who are qualified for this thing and it probally be best left up to them to handle it and you may have relatives who have and i dont think they would advertise it to you especially if they know of your views that they may have committed crimes.

I was also thinking about how you believed it would be good for these fellows to be raped in jail but that would be committing the same crime as what they committed and how could the authorities overlook such a ghastly crime no matter who the victims were, its like you believe society should allow itself to be lowered to their shocking acts ourselves. I would not want the authorities to turn a blind eye to this behaviour because that would also make me a partaker indirectly to the same crime that they committed and i would not want myself incriminated in that.....as i would be involved in raping as well and you to crackaton so society could not do that either or itself to would be a rapist a sodomy rapist and to get some one to do its evil work and turn a blind eye and at the same time have rape criminalised would be hypocrisy.

I just see now why it is best to the those in our society to handle the justice system and i can now see why judges donot like th emedia getting involved or influencing their judgements because the media are known to never print or publicise the whole story and at times they have printed only what they want us to hear.

The mark latham story recently is a prime example they followed his kids around to hungry jacks and just would not leave him alone so he smashed the camera and the reporter which was a crime but for the life of me why wasnt it a crime for the photographer to be charged for stalking the poor bloke and his children.

how do you think Murdoch and packer make so much money? The media are worse than the mafia and probably share the same bed

TheAnalyst · 25 March 2006

crackaton said:
how do you think Murdoch and packer make so much money? The media are worse than the mafia and probably share the same bed

That would not surprise me at all......its just a shame that our society has to pay for it in so many ways

It's Snake Pliskin · 25 March 2006

crackaton said:
I reckon theirs behinds would be very big and sloppy by now. lol

Rather than reducing the sentence, let em serve 1 year behind bars then shoot em, much better deterent and saves us tax payers heaps of money!!

Shoot the criminals and put their families in prison to serve their sentences. This would stop them.

TheAnalyst · 25 March 2006

Snake Pliskin said:
Shoot the criminals and put their families in prison to serve their sentences. This would stop them.

Snake

Which criminal offences do you think deserve to have an offender shot as there are many and various offences that one can commit??

It's Snake Pliskin · 25 March 2006

TheAnalyst said:
Snake

Which criminal offences do you think deserve to have an offender shot as there are many and various offences that one can commit??

Gang rape and those more severe.
If one steals cut their hands off and one hand of every member of their family.

stockGURU · 25 March 2006

Snake Pliskin said:
If one steals cut their hands off and one hand of every member of their family.

Snake,

Sounds like your preferred system of justice has much in common with muslim countries.

It's Snake Pliskin · 25 March 2006

stockGURU said:
Snake,

Sounds like your preferred system of justice has much in common with muslim countries.

You said the M word not me
Yes it`s ironic isn`t it?

No look, I am joking around a bit, but I would like to see things better than they are.

crackaton · 25 March 2006

TheAnalyst said:
Snake

Which criminal offences do you think deserve to have an offender shot as there are many and various offences that one can commit??

As a wannabe lawyer you have much to learn, but good luck.

It's Snake Pliskin · 25 March 2006

People have rights including criminals.

But, we all have a right to not have crime in society. The sooner decision makers woke up to this life would be a lot better.

TheAnalyst · 25 March 2006

So really what you are saying here there needs to be more severe punishments for the more severe crimes? and again what we are seeing here that a one fit for all judgement for all types of crimes is not appropriate as well?

Happy · 26 March 2006

We can see the benefit of removing rotten apple from the basket before rot spreads to other apples, why don’t we see that society would benefit if we used the same principle.

And the good news is, globally we are looking at overpopulation sooner or later, so we have first possible candidates for permanent removal.

TheAnalyst · 26 March 2006

Happy said:
We can see the benefit of removing rotten apple from the basket before rot spreads to other apples, why don’t we see that society would benefit if we used the same principle.

And the good news is, globally we are looking at overpopulation sooner or later, so we have first possible candidates for permanent removal.

Which types of criminals should be removed first?/

Murders
Manslaughterers
Rapists
Digital Rapists
Indecent exposureres
Pi**ers in public
Seriously recklessly causing injurers
Recklessy causing injurers
Assualts
common assualts
breachers of intervention orders
shoplifters
burgurlars
car thieves
fraudaulers
perjurers
perverters of justice
garden thieves

Bobby · 26 March 2006

Back in the 1980s there was a sicko that kept theiving female panties of clothes lines.

The police would catch him & off to jail he went time & time again, each time a bit longer.

Now this grub cost the community a fortune over time, theres got to be a better way dealing with someone like this .?

Can you think of some? .

Bob.

TheAnalyst · 26 March 2006

Bobby said:
Back in the 1980s there was a sicko that kept theiving female panties of clothes lines.

The police would catch him & off to jail he went time & time again, each time a bit longer.

Now this grub cost the community a fortune over time, theres got to be a better way dealing with someone like this .?

Can you think of some? .

Bob.

Do you think they should kill him for stealing all those under wear??

Bobby · 26 March 2006

TheAnalyst said:
Do you think they should kill him for stealing all those under wear??

No, but how about we put him in a zoo with his panties : so as to recoup costs ?.

Bob.

TheAnalyst · 27 March 2006

See this is what i am saying here when you stop and think about it a little a one punishment to fit all crime is obviously not the answer. It is easy for the media to whip the public up into a frenzy and get them making emotional un thought of ideas about what to do with people who commit crimes.

It is easy for your police and prison offices to call for more punishments for crime and these authoritues unions but you must remeber it is in their best interests that they do as it means job and wage protection and the continued growth of the sector they are in.It is not in their economic interest to stop crime.

If Australia adopted the same procedures for drug crimes and drug addicts as they do in Singapore we would do away with a lot of these drug linked crimes but the police would find a drop in the need for so many police. You just have to ask the families who have drug addicted members and they would not hesitate for a Singapore approach to drug rehabilitation.

anon · 27 March 2006

Bobby said:
Back in the 1980s there was a sicko that kept theiving female panties of clothes lines.

The police would catch him & off to jail he went time & time again, each time a bit longer.

Now this grub cost the community a fortune over time, theres got to be a better way dealing with someone like this .?

Can you think of some? .

Bob.

A simpler and much cheaper solution than jailing this gentleman would have been to have him interviewed on Channel 9's A Current Affair or Seven's This Day Tonight and asked ladies to send him their used undies, preferably unwashed.

anon

Happy · 27 March 2006

Well, how about isolation from the rest of society, who satisfy recognised standards, but they have to be self sufficient and produce enough goods and services to cover the accommodation, facilities depreciation and wages of personnel looking after them.

Then this would not be easy accommodation and zero cost to society.

This would make non-criminals happier too, and individual members of society would see the benefit of staying straight.

And labour camps are not such a bad idea either, but with 2,000 members on this forum we will probably have 5,000 to 10,000 valid ideas and nothing will ever happen if we just talk about it.

Reduced sentences

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency