doogie_goes_off
disbelieve if you can
- Joined
- 27 February 2007
- Posts
- 655
- Reactions
- 31
Well this graph tells the story: a 'recent performance' evaluation seems like there is stuff all margin in the moly world again. This will put some pressure on low grade Cu (+Mo) producers that are already dealing with a turn around in Cu demand. It's a very nasty decline and I have to say I'm sad for a well set up operation to have valuable assets sitting idle. Maybe there will be a day when they start again. Beating the cycle is a hard thing and maybe they will get the jump on the competition when the time is right.
Well Done Jman .... write on the money and I hope that your post may have stopped someone from dipping thier toe in the water..... well done Cheers
So what is the liong term future of QOL and moly stocks fundamentally? Has the boom really finished until the next one?
OUM acquired almost 10% of QOL, in which they can now block MLM's takeover. Another statement issued on the extension of the offer, valuing OUM's offer higher than MLM's, we'll probably see MLM up their offer in the short term! I hold a small amount of QOL as a punt, which less than $800k cash left, the company is running on 1 leg...
More like 1 leg, half an amputated arm with the other arm trying to hold their insides in UPKA...:
These OUM douchebags sound like they're getting a bit shirty, and I have absolutely zero intention of accepting the crumbs they're offering us.
QOL is the meat in the sandwich atm, this was probably always going to happen once Wolfam Camp turned out to be a dud;... the vultures came sniffing around looking to pick up a virtually new plant for next to nothing.
Now we just have to wait while they scrap it out amongst themselves. I have to say though, that MLM's portfolio looks to be superio to OUM's, who have nothing to offer but blue-sky potential, which I want nothing to do with at this stage.
jman
Just had a read of the statements and agree wholeheartedly jman. OUM sound very shirty and don't want to agree on any terms whatsoever from MLM. I feel sorry for QOL holders at this stage...looks like it could turn into a dog fight unless MLM withdraws or changes terms considerably. Does OUM really have the best interests of its and QOL's holders at present?
JTLP, something really smells with the entire OUM and QOL relationship imo. I notice that Christopher Jodinson who is the CEO of OUM is also a former company secretary for QOL, so potentially there is some collusion going on here.QOL's management are an absolute disgrace to say the least, to potentially sell of a $40M brand new plant which is owned by the shareholders for next to nothing leaves me lost for words. I also note that QOL have made next to no effort to try and secure a better outcome for shareholders since Wolfam fell over.
So no, I don't believe either OUM or QOL give a rats about their shareholders, and just how OUM intend to fund the new entity remains to be seen. The eventual outcome may provide slightly better terms fo QOL holders, but unless you bought @<5c the effect will probably be negligible.
jman
Metallica seeks final orders to the effect that:
1. Outback provide corrective disclosure remedying the allegedly misleading
statements and
2. withdrawal rights be granted to Queensland Ores shareholders who have
accepted the Outback offer in reliance on the allegedly misleading statements.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?