- Joined
- 6 January 2009
- Posts
- 2,300
- Reactions
- 1,130
The United States adult film industry produces 4,000–11,000 films a year and earns an estimated $9–$13 billion in gross revenues annually. An estimated 200 production companies employ 1,200–1,500 performers. Performers typically earn $400–$1,000 per shoot and are not compensated based on distribution or sales.
I dont disagree that a lot of pr0n stars/table dancer/strippers are 'groomed' due to circumstances etc but i am a firm believer that if someone really dislikes or disagrees with something, they will find a way to get out of it (same as a drug addict getting clean)
The demand is obviously there, so in a free economy supply should meet demand...
I dont disagree that a lot of pr0n stars/table dancer/strippers are 'groomed' due to circumstances etc but i am a firm believer that if someone really dislikes or disagrees with something, they will find a way to get out of it (same as a drug addict getting clean)
The demand is obviously there, so in a free economy supply should meet demand...
I dont disagree that a lot of pr0n stars/table dancer/strippers are 'groomed' due to circumstances etc but i am a firm believer that if someone really dislikes or disagrees with something, they will find a way to get out of it (same as a drug addict getting clean)
The demand is obviously there, so in a free economy supply should meet demand...
How many drug addicts have you known? I mean real drug addicts not people who don't mind a line on a Friday night.
If that's where the bar is set, then let's start a sex trafficking business, you can make tonnes of money and there's definately supply.
Wayne, I'm not sure that we don't worry about gratuitous violence. It has, however, become so ubiquitous that we perhaps are coming to regard it as 'normal', with consequent results in reality.What is the difference between gratuitous violence and gratuitous sex?
Why does one have a free rein and not the other?
Why does one make us worry (on an official level) about the moral fabric of society and not the other?
Just asking.
That seems logical enough for those of us who do favour a free economy, and - on the precedent I've previously advocated of being totally against restricting access to pokies a la Andrew Wilkie - I'd have to agree. But I can't ignore a sense of concern about really violent pr0n being available to young people who are still immature and vulnerable to thinking they'll not be accepted by their peer group unless they do whatever some horny young bloke tells them.I dont disagree that a lot of pr0n stars/table dancer/strippers are 'groomed' due to circumstances etc but i am a firm believer that if someone really dislikes or disagrees with something, they will find a way to get out of it (same as a drug addict getting clean)
The demand is obviously there, so in a free economy supply should meet demand...
To be honest, I'm not exactly sure what I was asking, but your post above probably gets it pretty right.And this is where Julia started this thread Prawn. Should we allow the marketplace to totally dictate what is produced or do Governments as our representatives decide some demands are too destructive to allow industries to be developed to meet them ?
The classic case is hard drugs. We have already talked about child pornography. In some places and at some times people believed poker machines were just clever ways to entice people to empty their wallets into the machines. So they were banned. (Think Victoria until 1990s)
Of course in a neo liberal economy the business view prevails that people should be free to make up their own minds and that as responsible human beings no one is going to allow themselves to be enslaved by something as silly as a poker machine....(not unless we can help it of course .!)
Perhaps this discussion is asking the same question about unrestricted availability of hard core pornography and the overt sexualisation of the media and public spaces.
I never said it was easy, but the human mind can accomplish amazing feats if it truly wants/needs to.
I think there needs to be basic human rights (as i mentioned in my 1st post on this thread); sex trafficking wouldn't be consenting adults.
prawn_86 said:I dont disagree that a lot of pr0n stars/table dancer/strippers are 'groomed' due to circumstances etc but i am a firm believer that if someone really dislikes or disagrees with something, they will find a way to get out of it
That seems logical enough for those of us who do favour a free economy, and - on the precedent I've previously advocated of being totally against restricting access to pokies a la Andrew Wilkie - I'd have to agree. But I can't ignore a sense of concern about really violent pr0n being available to young people who are still immature and vulnerable to thinking they'll not be accepted by their peer group unless they do whatever some horny young bloke tells them.
This evening I heard part of an ABC Radio interview with someone from the ABC Religion and Ethics Department. This person was quoting Robert Manne and Clive Hamilton whom he said had been speaking out against the pr0n industry.
But, Calliope , what do you think about the issue of the widespread production and viewing of extreme pornography ? Do you think it's a problem for individuals and the broader community ?
If it is a problem what do you think we should consider doing ? ( And I agree - there are no simple easy answers to that question.)
Haven't you been grocery shopping recently? Plenty of bush pigs out there.We need more Annie Sprinkles in this world.
Thanks for sharing, we are all richer for the knowledge.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?