Given the recent downturn in the market I see a number of stocks on my watch list as being at prices where I am happy to buy in, i intend to put about $100,000 into the market and I have a watch list that sits at about 50 with 20 shares flagged as potential buys, I suspect that is far too many - parcels of $5000 seem a little small.
What sort of strategies do others use to decide on size of parcels relative to total capital and also number of share investments relative to starting capital?
Given the recent downturn in the market I see a number of stocks on my watch list as being at prices where I am happy to buy in, i intend to put about $100,000 into the market and I have a watch list that sits at about 50 with 20 shares flagged as potential buys, I suspect that is far too many - parcels of $5000 seem a little small.
What sort of strategies do others use to decide on size of parcels relative to total capital and also number of share investments relative to starting capital?
I understand what you're saying, craft, and have sometimes followed the same safe path. But in so doing, don't you sometimes reflect on that stock you sold which went on to make another 50%?I have found this upper limit for portfolio concentration due to market movements to be one of the most challenging aspects of setting boundaries for myself.
You are basically overriding the principle of letting your winners run to protect yourself (Psychologically) from the volatility associated with a major concentration in the portfolio. If you can switch into better perceived value its not so bad - More just a prompt then, to do something you should probably be doing anyway.
Personally I knock the top off anything that pokes it head above 25% of its account.
Concentration (2-3 stocks max). Cash always available. No leverage.
I think there is tipping point in stock picking where the increase in number of stocks to diversify risk reduces the effectiveness of the judgement/skill of the stock picker to produce excess returns. Finding that tipping point is key.
Cheers
Here’s a similar discussion that occurred some time ago. ...
Oddson, you are the 'odd one out' in suggesting such a low number of stocks, I am always interested in contrary viewpoints and the rational for them.
So would you just continue to cull a shortlist of 12 (which happens to be what i have trimmed mine to), until you had the 2-3 you loved the most?
I do notice the longer i look and more i research, the shorter my list gets!
Perhaps depends on your approach. I can understand that if you're going to be doing lots of assessment about value of a company etc, that would be right. But if, eg, you take a simple trend following approach there's no reason not to hold quite a few more than 8 stocks.From all my reading to date I will be pleasantly surprised that an ordinary investor can achieve decent unleveraged excess returns (CAGR>20%) over a suitable time period (> 5 years) by holding more than 5 to 8 stocks in a portfolio - happy to be proven wrong by those that have.
Around $300K to invest, some will go into a positive geared commercial property where i live, some into cash and the balance into the planned investment strategy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?