This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

PEN - Peninsula Energy

Jump to new
Miner said:
China has few moles and agents in Australia who are constantly down ramping uranium prices and sentiment. So that China can buy few uranium mines in Australia and world wide at cheap prices.
Click to expand...

skc said:
You can not be serious! What is your opinion on chemtrails?
Click to expand...

They're spread by Santa's sled!!!:xmaswave

"Nobody knows about it yet, be the first to enter this multibagger, before the Chinese come shopping...

...Also heard that Chinese are interested and should be hearing something within next few weeks...

...Santa is real you know!"

Link

"Chemtrail spraying seems to be heaviest and most constant over North America and most countries of western Europe. Some countries in Asia are being sprayed (Japan and Korea), but the greatest exception to any chemtrail activity whatsover is China.
The Chinese are being spared completely because China is being groomed by the NWO to replace the United States as the leading nation of the world, both economically and militarily."

Link

 
:
Chalea said:
Do you think this is funny?
Click to expand...

Chalea, What I found funny was actually your sense of humour..... You used a picture and no words to make your point .... I thought that was clever ...... See, not everybody here hates you:

Seriously, many of your points are perfectly rational, and your price projections may or may not eventuate ...... but its up to the individual trader to play it as he sees it.

My honest opinion is that like most Uranium based stocks, PEN has some uphill battles to deal with, but, if I had to pick the most likely Uranium Junior to survive and prosper in the future, this would be it.

ps. If that is you in the above picture ... I see potential problems developing in the future:
 
NewTrade said:
Remove the tin hats and get back to projections!
Click to expand...

Okay, here goes...don't shoot the messenger...

Forget for a minute the short term rectangle, (target = 5.0c)
The bigger picture wedge, (targets = 4.4c/4.0c)
The unfilled gap @ 4.0c
The weekly chart's rectangle, (target = 3.5c)

Friday was pivotal. Traders were anticipating a MACD bullish cross following a RSI bullish divergence. Didn't happen...
The MACD didn't cross, but there's still hope?

Wrong! The RSI broke through it's support line dashing hope of the bullish divergence and price fell out of it's pennant.

Target = 2.0c (In my opinion, do your own research)

Link

Click


 
Huh? Im no expert but I think you may be pulling at straws calling that a penant. The lower line is supposed to be drawn through the troughs..like in the textbook diagram that you posted. can someone with more tech knowledge confrim this?
 

Have to clear up a couple of things -

"You need to explain how you have calculated your price targets.

If it's a technical target you need to explain, in TA terms, how you arrived at that particular price target. If it's a fundamental valuation, you also need to explain your reasoning in detail.

Your price targets seem to pulled out of thin air and seem to be intended just to provoke holders."

Dear Joe,

The attached description, (44239), thoroughly explains my target method.

I highlighted in green the following line & also provided a link -

"The expected price movement is approximately equal to the distance of the move into the pattern."

Refer to the green lines on the chart. The flagpole is measured from the start of the move to the start of the pattern. This pole is then subtracted from the pattern break down point.


"Huh? Im no expert but I think you may be pulling at straws calling that a penant. The lower line is supposed to be drawn through the troughs..like in the textbook diagram that you posted. can someone with more tech knowledge confrim this?"

Dear Billyb

The text book diagram shows a 'close' line chart. My method involves the use of candlesticks.

Regards
Chalea

 
Chalea said:
Target = 2.0c
Click to expand...
Yes because "the price fell out of its pennant!!".
Lets just keep a note of this and see if tech/a actually gets a win, instead of the usual incorrect prediction that disappears forgotten into the old thread pages.

My target: nowhere near 2.0c, reason: tech/a says otherwise.
 

Are you sure?
Allow me to quote...

"Always has alternate analysis possibilities even a fall to 2 c."

 
tothemax6 said:
instead of the usual incorrect prediction that disappears forgotten into the old thread pages.
Click to expand...

Check ALL my previous posts on this thread. I haven't forgotten them.

Have you forgotten what happened four years ago after the parabolic rise/collapse?

History appears to be repeating...

 
Chalea said:
It appears Silex is though...

View attachment 44235
Click to expand...

Oh so the SLX SP has fallen so there thru...brilliant assessment, with the keen sense of financial perception that you have just displayed you must obviously work for a big bank or ratings agency.

i shall dump all my SLX stock immediately.
 
So_Cynical said:
Oh so the SLX SP has fallen so there thru...brilliant assessment, with the keen sense of financial perception that you have just displayed you must obviously work for a big bank or ratings agency.

i shall dump all my SLX stock immediately.
Click to expand...

Heard a news report during the week.

Silex are closing their local solar panel manufacturing business.

Nuclear wasn't even mentioned...(embarrassed?)

Do you hold PEN?
 
Chalea said:
Have to clear up a couple of things -
View attachment 44240
Click to expand...
IMO, it's actually not a very good pennant to be basing any reliable TA forecast on. TA being probabilities means that this is probably a very tenuous call. I don't think anyone has argued the merits of the technical formation. To me, it has none.
 
kennas said:
IMO, it's actually not a very good pennant to be basing any reliable TA forecast on. TA being probabilities means that this is probably a very tenuous call. I don't think anyone has argued the merits of the technical formation. To me, it has none.
Click to expand...

With respect, I called the MAK peak on another forum while you apparently kept holding for months/years hoping for news.

I repeat, with respect.

Please offer us your TA opinion, preferably on a chart

Regards
 
Chalea said:
Heard a news report during the week.

Silex are closing their local solar panel manufacturing business.
Click to expand...

Yes i was reading that over the weekend...first time ive looked at SLX in maybe 3 years, the plant was uneconomical..apparently manufacturing in Australia is in a little trouble.

Chalea said:
Nuclear wasn't even mentioned...(embarrassed?)
Click to expand...

Embarrassed huh...gone straight thru to the keeper.

Chalea said:
Do you hold PEN?
Click to expand...

No...i have no interest at all in PEN however do not see the Nuclear industry as in decline or about to have a major reversal of fortune...Nuclear and in particular MSR technology, and Thorium has a great future.
 
Chalea said:
Please offer us your TA opinion, preferably on a chart
Click to expand...
Sorry, I can't do any charts from this venue. What I mean is that the 'triangle' you call is tenuous. You can draw some lines that make a triangle, but there is not enough contacts on the bottom side over the length of the formation to make it have more probability. All I am saying is that your price target is based on a possibly incorrect presumption. ie, that it is a triangle on a pole. IMO, it's just not a very good triangle.
 
So_Cynical said:
No...i have no interest at all in PEN however do not see the Nuclear industry as in decline or about to have a major reversal of fortune...Nuclear and in particular MSR technology, and Thorium has a great future.
Click to expand...

Maybe not, but those articles were posted to reinforce my view regarding the price of uranium, which is the sole driver behind price movements/the survival of uranium explorers/miners.
 

Fair enough. Many would require only two support touches before a breakout while I have drawn three, the last being a closing price.
Breakout wasn't ideal as it didn't occur between 50-75% of the pennant, BUT, it was confirmed by the RSI trend line break, (first touch in mid June, see earlier chart)

We shall see...

Click chart to expand
 
Triangles, pics of chalea and his cat?????

PEN thread looks more like play school gone wrong and trying, yet failing misersbly at geometry.

Makes a mockery of the forum and ASF!
 
hangseng said:
Triangles, pics of chalea and his cat?????

PEN thread looks more like play school gone wrong and trying, yet failing misersbly at geometry.

Makes a mockery of the forum and ASF!
Click to expand...

Please don't mock the triangle hangseng, as you see it is still in play...target =

Link

Please also note today's doji candlestick is remarkably similar to the one that preceded my inaugural post on ASF.

May I also highlight that price was unable to close above the moving average.

Remember the outcry when I dared to suggest that that was bearish when viewed on the weekly chart.

And who could forget that 5.9c is the old support/new resistance line for the weekly chart's rectangle...target = 3.5c

Link

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
MEE - Metex Resources
13 14 15
Replies
296
Views
54K
Joe Blow
BCC - Buccaneer Energy
16 17 18
Replies
341
Views
72K
zzaaxxss3401
Z
CNF - Continental Goldfields
2 3
Replies
55
Views
17K
Boyou
Uranium in for correction, not a rout
Replies
0
Views
8K
motion
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...