- Joined
- 14 October 2009
- Posts
- 40
- Reactions
- 0
Yes and big business they pay between $15000 & $20000 dollars each p/year, that is + living cost, if they then choose to apply for permanent resident they pay another $800 for each time they go for the english test and only about 25% pass, I believe (do not know) in Sydney the numbers that go for the test each month is beyond 5000 .For better or worse, education is a business.
Yes and big business they pay between $15000 & $20000 dollars each p/year, that is + living cost, if they then choose to apply for permanent resident they pay another $800 for each time they go for the english test and only about 25% pass, I believe (do not know) in Sydney the numbers that go for the test each month is beyond 5000 .
so what...we shouldn't be selling our degrees in this way at any price!!!! 560000 students...my god, that is the size of Hobart...and its happening very quietly...if Australians truly knew, they would be up in arms about this
there is also a COST to australia.......more international students in overcrowded lecture theatres, crowded computer pools.......we should be prioritising the education for young aussies, not foreign nationals
and because it is now a business it has been abused.....and what a joke that is
560000 students times $15000 = a lot of money added to the aussie economy every year and that is just in school fees.so what...we shouldn't be selling our degrees in this way at any price!!!! 560000 students...my god, that is the size of Hobart...and its happening very quietly...if Australians truly knew, they would be up in arms about this
So have you done a full cost:benefit analysis of this WB?
They pump a hell of a lot of money into the economy, which is a good thing. While i agree that lots of tutes and lectures are crowded, i would be interested to know what % figure of total tertiary students are from overseas.
Who exactly are you outraged at? The students? The uni's? The governments? Seems a bit of a directionless, overly patriotic, rant to me
that this has to be debated that it is wrong for the future of aust tells me that we have sold our education to the highest bidder, and most don't give a stuff about educating the next generation of australians - they would rather focus on educating foreigners who have the cash to come here!!!!! Oh dear
so what...we shouldn't be selling our degrees in this way at any price!!!! 560000 students...my god, that is the size of Hobart...and its happening very quietly...if Australians truly knew, they would be up in arms about this
there is also a COST to australia.......more international students in overcrowded lecture theatres, crowded computer pools.......we should be prioritising the education for young aussies, not foreign nationals
and because it is now a business it has been abused.....and what a joke that is
china, singapore etc etc wouldn't be this stupid to sacrifice the education of the next generation for a quick buck to be made from foreign students
:
However, it should not be at the cost of local students.
Universities give preferential treatment for full fee paying students. They are short on cash so ofcourse will do whatever is necessary to charge more fees.
As a basic example, the cut off UAI mark (or what ever it is called in your state) will be about 5 points lower for a full fee paying student over a HECS student.
Note that full fee paying students are not just overseas students. This also includes kids with rich parents who can buy a spot.
The university placement system has been replaced from the tertiary ranking to the new $ system. Both systems work like an auction.
In one system your highest bid that you can make is your entrance mark, in the new system your highest bid is whatever your daddy can afford.
With most foreign students your bid is whatever loan size you can get.
I would like to see as many foreign students come to Australia, only after all the local tax payers have had their positions filled. We would then auction off the remaining spots.
The problem is, there are no remaining spots. Its not uncommon to have 500 people in the one lecture room.
The solution isnt to limit the amount of foreign students, we should be increasing capacity.
Limiting the amount of foreign students is akin to not expanding the newcastle coal terminal.
WinnieBlue, define young aussie for us please. Most university students are not your typical beach blonde 18 year old. Most are asian and a high perecentage are mature age students.
Another reason why uni's are overcrowded is that we just dont have enough academics to teach these courses. How do we get more academics? by increasing the number of people who get a degree.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?