I have a pretty dim view of MBA's. Aside from the networking, what I've seen of the average MBA grad is no better than someone without an MBA, but they tend to think they're superheroes. MBAs are sold as learning leadership etc, and it is true people who come out of top (global 20) MBA schools have leadership skills, but I'd argue that those who went to those schools already had a natural gift for leadership, that's how they got in, so there's a fair bit of attribution bias. Doing an MBA at UNE or another third tier university will not "teach" you to lead. In fact it won't teach you much at all.
Regarding online MBAs, to be blunt, if I saw "online MBA" on a potential candidate's CV, the CV would probably go straight in the bin. My theory is if you're going to do something do it properly, and one of the most important aspects of an MBA is group work. I've seen an online MBA course, it was very, very basic stuff more akin to what you'd expect in a diploma course at TAFE. I did one of the online case studies, it took me about an hour and I got 100%. Really...without reading any course material or knowing anything about the subject matter (beyond general business knowledge) I got 100% (it was this simulation in case you're wondering
https://cb.hbsp.harvard.edu/cbmp/product/7015-HTM-ENG -- and no it wasn't a Harvard online MBA!
). It makes you wonder if the certificates are printed on the day you pay your course fees, because I can't see anyone failing.
There is a certain subset of people who go goo-goo for MBAs, unfortunately they seem to have convinced HR that MBAs are worth more than on the ground experience. For most, the only ones who benefit are the MBA factories. I'd also point out that less than half of Fortune 500 CEO's have an MBA.