- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,770
- Reactions
- 24,757
Exactly. Or better still, more than 6% at call online. Ubank are still offering 6.11%.
That's ok. Whoever is in power, I won't be talking the market down like some.
You can trade in the USA
2 stocks i picked up from here in that time frame AUT,AKI are doing allright
(wont mention the lemons)
What an insult to the majority of Australians! Curious to know why you feel so superior to your fellow Aussies? It can't be your spelling.
Don't think I excluded myself from the rest of the electorate anywhere in my post. Nor was it directed as an insult, merely a comment on the fact that humans believe themselves to be rational, yet constantly disprove this theory. Your comprehension is lacking.
My spelling appears to be superior to yours. Can not see anything spelt incorrectly in my post.
rationale????The problem lies in the fact that the electorate are incapable of rationale judgement and are just as useless as the politicians, therefore comment does and will continue to occur as they can be easily manipulated.
See above: "rationale". Perhaps just a typo.Don't think I excluded myself from the rest of the electorate anywhere in my post. Nor was it directed as an insult, merely a comment on the fact that humans believe themselves to be rational, yet constantly disprove this theory. Your comprehension is lacking.
My spelling appears to be superior to yours. Can not see anything spelt incorrectly in my post.
rationale????
Not necessary for me to comment on it and I wouldn't have except that your assertion that the electorate was so incapable of exercising decent judgment seemed very unfair, and I got cross.
Where is my misspelling? I'm always happy to learn if I am wrong.
With thanks.
You can't accuse the Libs of not being able to tell jokes.
Yes, of course they are. "Rational" was the one that made sense in this context.Rationale and spelt are both legitimate words. They may not be the most regularly used.
Me neither, and I apologise for drawing attention to the unimportant error.My comment regarding your spelling was a cheap shot. You incorrectly believed my spelling was wrong hence your spelling was incorrect (on that occasion).
Don't want to start a pointless slanging match (there are enough in this thread already)!
Generous of you. Thank you. Ditto: look forward to reading more of yours.I enjoy your reading your contribution to this forum for what it's worth.
Oh, goodness. Did he really say that? Why do they so shoot themselves in the foot!You can't accuse the Libs of not being able to tell jokes.
Did you hear Christopher Pyne on TV last night re: the Andrew Wilke saga?
"This is the greatest political betrayal since Edward Vth murdered his two nephews in the tower of London"
I don't think so!!
Oh, goodness. Did he really say that? Why do they so shoot themselves in the foot!
As stated above, it is not certain that the princes were murdered. Nonetheless, there were rumors, based on eyewitness claims, that King Richard III had them murdered. They were supposedly smothered with a pillow and then buried underneath a set of stairs. This matches up with evidence found in the Tower of London in 1674. That year, the skeletons of two children were found in a chest beneath the Chapel stairs in the tower. The remains were taken to Westminster Abbey and buried there, near some of the siblings of the princes.
THE opposition will attempt to tie Julia Gillard to the Craig Thomson scandal when parliament resumes next month as it mounts a fresh push to topple her fragile minority government.
"Clearly we want to know why the Fair Work Australia has not concluded a three-year investigation into what was an open and shut case, and what role the Prime Minister has played in all that."
"Clearly we want to know why the Fair Work Australia has not concluded a three-year investigation into what was an open and shut case, and what role the Prime Minister has played in all that."
In modern parlance, two suspicious deaths, with suspected foul play. The malignant Richard III was a person of interest, who could have assisted police with their enquiries.Yes. Jokes are seldom factually based. Edward V was actually one of the murdered princes. http://historicmysteries.com/the-princes-in-the-tower
When contacted by the Sunday Canberra Times this morning, Ms Sattler said she had been at the tent embassy but she was not the go between.
UNIONS ACT secretary Kim Sattler has denied allegations she was the go-between to the Prime Minister’s office who tipped off the Aboriginal Tent Embassy ahead of ugly protests on Australia Day.
Ms Sattler was named by Tent Embassy co-founder Michael Anderson and spokeswoman Barbara Shaw at a press conference this afternoon as the person who passed on Opposition leader Tony Abbott’s comments and whereabouts.
Kim Sattler has denied receiving any messages from the Gillard PM Office. This is no joke.
“I heard it from the crowd,’’ she said.
Workplace Relations minister Bill Shorten today denied the government had any contact with the independent FWA in its investigation into Mr Thomson and urged anybody who had evidence to back such claims to come forward.
"There is simply no evidence of any interference whatsoever by the government and if there is somehow something new then by all means bring it to light," Mr Shorten told The Australian Online.
"Since Ms Jackson's comments on television last night we have again been advised by the highest levels of our department that no information has either been passed on to FWA or sought from them on the investigation."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?