Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,695
- Reactions
- 10,307
Bollocks, utter bollocks... seriously what's the point in posting politically motivated, well worded rubbish with a content value of nothing. :disgust: why not comment on today's GDP numbers? perhaps you can somehow spin it to make the Coalition look good.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...n-on-bullish-gdp/story-e6frg916-1226386561291
perhaps you can somehow spin it to make the Coalition look good.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...n-on-bullish-gdp/story-e6frg916-1226386561291
Fortunately nobody has to spin anything, even in Europe and the U,K(I've just got back) they are talking about how unpopular this labor govt is. I joke not.and they weren't Australians commenting.
The goose is cooked.
It is a shameful waste of money on a technology that will be redundant in five years time.
Designed on the back of an envelope, on a tax payer paid flight, in business class seats, by two Labor ministers who have never had a proper job in their lives.
And nobody in N.Queensland has heard of it, witnessed it's benefits nor used it, except on tax payer funded advertisements.
gg
I'll sign off on your timesheet NBNMyths.
It should be worth time x 2.5 for such a late night post on behalf of the comrades on the ship of fools.
gg
I wish. Currently sitting in my SOHO with my 3-week-old, while my wife gets some shuteye. Should be finishing off editing a video which is due next week, but I'm talking to one dummy, while inserting another, instead.
lol, I will pay that one.
Congrats on being a man rich in your family happiness and productivity.
Come on, if he was being paid surely he would choose a better name.
Calliope would be better for instance.
Obviously NBNMyths is well paid by Conroy's department to spread his spin. He denies this of course, but he would, wouldn't he? The taxpayer has to bear the cost of his blatant propaganda. He has no other purpose on this forum.
The only reason I'm on this forum at all is because someone linked to my nbnmyths blog somewhere near the start of this thread and it came up in the referrals list when I was checking my stats.
In senate estimates a couple of weeks ago, the takeup rate of Kiama was given as 34%, and Willunga as 30%. These sites went live in October 2011, so that's a ~6 month period, although Telstra (with 50% market share) only started offering services in March 2012.
Putting that into perspective:
The takeup rate of ADSL in Australia was 3% after 18 months
The takeup rate of ADSL/ADSL2+ in Tasmania now is ~44% after 11 years.
The takeup rate of Optus cable internet in the footprint is ~20% after 10 years
The takeup rate of Verizon FiOS fibre optic internet (in the USA) is about 30% after 5 years.
During the building phase the fibre to the premises installation does not have a fee.
I'm sure plenty of the people in the regions have a Bigpond connection and Bigpond has only just made an announcement about NBN fibre customers in Tasmania. Telstra wouldn't connect customers in Tasmania because the customer termination equipment limited things to 100 Mbit.
What is meant by the take-up rate in relation to the NBN?
For example, does 30% mean that the fibre cable passed X amount of houses and 30% of those houses opted to have a connection from their house to the fibre cable. Or does it mean that the fibre cable was installed in X premises and 30% of those premises have taken out a broadband service on that connection?
For the former, is there a cost to the householder of connecting their house to the street fibre cable?
So it costs the householder nothing to install the fibre connection to their premises, even if they never intend to use the service at all?
So is this what the take up-rate is referring to, the number of households who have installed the fibre to their premises? If so, why then the comparison with ADSL, ADSL2 and Cable, which presumably cost the consumer to install, whether it be for the service or modems or whatever?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?