- Joined
- 28 October 2008
- Posts
- 8,609
- Reactions
- 39
It's OK to agree to disagree, but leaving the questions unanswered leaves your comments either unsubstantiated or from a viewpoint so limited as not to be reflective of the broader issue.Dr Smith,
We'll have to agree to disagree on much of what you've written. To answer two of your points, however:
I have skimmed the Coalition background paper, and I'll read it more thoroughly when I get a chance.
At least it's now an option.I am hopeful, once the Coalition gets in that they will modify the policy again to enable easy access to fibre to the home.
Another question Myths to add to the list above,So let's say you do stump up the $5k for fibre, you will then have to pay the same cost for a 100Mbps plan as you would under the Labor NBN, even though you've already paid for the fibre connection up front. You're $5k worse off, but you don't get any of that back as savings on monthly bills.
Why not forever? Good riddance, if you ask me.but only if Julia Gillard is sent to the dark side of the moon until after the election.
Actually it's pretty accurate. Certainly more accurate than Abbott's regular false claims, such as "people will pay 3 times more for an NBN plan than they do for ADSL2 today".
So let's say you do stump up the $5k for fibre, you will then have to pay the same cost for a 100Mbps plan as you would under the Labor NBN, even though you've already paid for the fibre connection up front. You're $5k worse off, but you don't get any of that back as savings on monthly bills.
So basically because you don't want it and no one else in your family wants it basically anyone who does is greedy?So what's wrong with that?
Why should I have to subsidise bling speed, when I don't want it, my wife doesn't want it. My mother and mother in law don't even have computers, but will subsidise it.
How is it any different from people like myself who paid to put in our own insulation, then this government made us subsidise everyone else to put in for free.
Seems to me, that as long as your getting what you want, who gives a rats @rse what anyone else wants. Yet they have to help pay for it.
Jeez you lot are unbelievable.
Socialism is magic, untill you run out of other peoples money.
So basically because you don't want it and no one else in your family wants it basically anyone who does is greedy?
I don't want to subsidise middle class families and low-income earners, I don't want to subsidise super tax breaks, I don't want this and that, or anything really, and I still pay for it each pay cheque.If you want those who don't want it to pay for it YES.
I don't want to subsidise middle class families and low-income earners, I don't want to subsidise super tax breaks, I don't want this and that, or anything really, and I still pay for it each pay cheque.
Let me guess you're over 60 and have a tax-free pension that I'm subsidising.
So basically because you don't want it and no one else in your family wants it basically anyone who does is greedy?
Yeah through massive negative gearing benefits over the years I bet.Self funded
Another question Myths to add to the list above,
Where then does the increase in average wholesale price over time under Labor's NBN when compared to that of the Opposition's come from ?
I'm sure someone had a big whinge when they put copper in the ground so people could use the phone too.The same goes with this, if I'm happy with the speed I have now, why shouldn't I be able to elect the cheaper option.
So what's wrong with that?
Why should I have to subsidise bling speed, when I don't want it, my wife doesn't want it. My mother and mother in law don't even have computers, but will subsidise it.
How is it any different from people like myself who paid to put in our own insulation, then this government made us subsidise everyone else to put in for free.
Seems to me, that as long as your getting what you want, who gives a rats @rse what anyone else wants. Yet they have to help pay for it.
Jeez you lot are unbelievable.
Socialism is magic, untill you run out of other peoples money.
If you want those who don't want it to pay for it YES.
Yeah through massive negative gearing benefits over the years I bet.
You won't be subsidising them, they will be subsidising you. It is the revenue from high-end users that allow the construction of such an expensive network without increasing the cost for low-end users who don't want or need the speed.
The coalition policy is cheaper to build, but it also forgoes the higher revenue from high-end speeds because those speeds are not available. So the network earns less revenue, making it unlikely that low end speeds will be any cheaper than on the fibre NBN.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?