Nationals get Angry

• 3 October 2011

• #1

sptrawler

Joined

3 July 2009

Posts

27,760

Reactions

24,739

I don't know why Labor think Angry Anderson running for a seat is funny.
Jeez he couldn't do a worse job than Peter Garrett has.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...sh-for-nationals/story-fn3dxity-1226156964618

 

• 3 October 2011

• #2

So_Cynical

The Contrarian Averager

Joined

31 August 2007

Posts

7,467

Reactions

1,469

Angry Anderson was always considered to be a Peter Garrett clone of sorts, less talented, not as good looking and with only half the credibility of Garrett.

 

• 3 October 2011

• #3

sails

Joined

16 June 2005

Posts

4,281

Reactions

6

I think Angry Anderson is also known for his charity work. I wouldn't be so quick to write him off. The voters will decide...

 

• 3 October 2011

• #4

sptrawler

Joined

3 July 2009

Posts

27,760

Reactions

24,739

So_Cynical said:

Angry Anderson was always considered to be a Peter Garrett clone of sorts, less talented, not as good looking and with only half the credibility of Garrett.

Click to expand...

Thats a bit nasty, less talent, worse looking and half the credibility of Garrett.
You really know how to insult someone.

 

• 3 October 2011

• #5

Garpal Gumnut

Ross Island Hotel

Joined

2 January 2006

Posts

13,797

Reactions

10,574

Angry is a good bloke, and it does not surprise me he has joined the Nats. He will be a great asset to the party and be a fine parliamentarian.

gg