- Joined
- 8 June 2014
- Posts
- 29
- Reactions
- 0
Fast becoming more women's health and less of IVF/ARS, although that is still it's core by quite some margin.
And I like this....
What do you mean by "regulatory risk" ?
Doctors at Monash IVF have demanded a meeting with the board, chaired by Richard Davis, on August 31, following the resignation of two senior embryologists Tiki Osianlis and Maria Diamente.
"When conscientious and committed staff feel they have no other option than to resign from a job they have given so much to, it indicates something is fundamentally wrong," says a letter to the board signed by 29 doctors and obtained by The Australian Financial Review.
"We share their [the embryologists] concerns that… Monash IVF Group seems intent on moving away from what all of us have considered to be core Monash IVF values for a long time."
Associate professor Luk Rombauts, Monash IVF's research director, and associate professor Beverley Vollenhoven, two of the signatories to the letter, also met with the company earlier this month.
It is understood the doctors want to have a more of a role in vetting policies that could impact on patients, be consulted when prices are raised for IVF treatments and stop the hire of new IVF specialists.
Need to look into developments in FET. I don't understand it sufficiently.
This from the H1 2015 Investor presentation:
View attachment 62847
Why is it that FET is increasing in the mix?
What do they mean by "ongoing change in clinical practice" that leads to this development?
How does this impact the number of IVF cycles undertaken?
Any assistance gratefully received.
I was having a think about the implications for the end of the one child policy. The way wealthy Chinese buy up Australian baby formula got me thinking, will wealthy Chinese couples come to Australia to get their IVF done here because of better regulation etc? I don't know whether the answer is yes or no, just something that I think might have the potential to really benefit guys like MVF.
Anyone?
Here's an article you might find interesting.
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/30/end-of-one-child-policy-means-mayhem-in-chinas-ivf-sector.html
Basic premises:
It is hard to get through the hoops and for both operators and patients and conduct IVF services in China.
There's expected to be rising demand in China.
Yes, Chinese couples do already look overseas.
Article mentioned that between 30-40% of Monash and Virtus' existing patients already come from China. Potential for this to increase.
Sorry, check the edit. Didn't copy the first time.Thanks, mate. The link is dead though.
I was having a think about the implications for the end of the one child policy. The way wealthy Chinese buy up Australian baby formula got me thinking, will wealthy Chinese couples come to Australia to get their IVF done here because of better regulation etc? I don't know whether the answer is yes or no, just something that I think might have the potential to really benefit guys like MVF.
Anyone?
, will wealthy Chinese couples come to Australia to get their IVF done here because of better regulation etc?
Anyone?
Article mentioned that between 30-40% of Monash and Virtus' existing patients already come from China. Potential for this to increase.
nice pop today
DS what did u make of earnings report?
Thanks for that, after reading it a second time it looks like you might be right. The sentence structure itself is a bit misleading, and they could probably do with a full stop and a separate sentence.It said that 30-40% of patients going to Superior A.R.T in Thailand are from China.
No they won't. IVF services in China are of a high quality, although supply for services will be tight in the short term. No need at all to come here.
Interesting article, Ves.
So why do couples go overseas now?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?