- Joined
- 29 June 2006
- Posts
- 1,458
- Reactions
- 0
Thanks jama. It happened right on the closing bell. Will be interesting to see what happens tomorrow. I'm still not quite in the black, after director Mark cashed in to buy a new trailer home and rattled the market. I just hope he has not done a shonky and bought back in at the bottom.
I like the company but I fear that if they do find something half decent the rug will be pulled from under them and "nationalised" then were left high and dry.
As a holder of MHL I am interested in the comments made by Doris as I think it is very relevant to the fortunes of MHL. Please keep up the good work Doris.Sorry Doris, please don't be offended or take this the wrong way, but lately in this thread you have posted stories on Kyrgyzstan's government, economy, etc. Whilst MHL have operations there could we please keep this thread on MHL not politics, after all there are other ASX companies with operations there such as CIG. So if need be, start a Kyrgyzstan thread. I don't see any significant relationship between MHL and your post above (#465). It would be a bit like posting about the Australian government and it's policies and the economy in the BHP, RIO, etc. threads.
Dont entirely agree. Politics play a much greater role in a companys success in less stable political environments such as Kyrgyzstan and are therefore much more relevantSorry Doris, please don't be offended or take this the wrong way, but lately in this thread you have posted stories on Kyrgyzstan's government, economy, etc. Whilst MHL have operations there could we please keep this thread on MHL not politics, after all there are other ASX companies with operations there such as CIG. So if need be, start a Kyrgyzstan thread. I don't see any significant relationship between MHL and your post above (#465). It would be a bit like posting about the Australian government and it's policies and the economy in the BHP, RIO, etc. threads.
not really up on kyrgyz politics like i once was, so will be intrigued to learn of the election outcome
chairman spencer does have 20 years experience in aust foreign service's sevice in the region so would likely be no stranger to the main players
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7145133.stm
cheers
Sorry Doris, please don't be offended or take this the wrong way, but lately in this thread you have posted stories on Kyrgyzstan's government, economy, etc. Whilst MHL have operations there could we please keep this thread on MHL not politics, after all there are other ASX companies with operations there such as CIG. So if need be, start a Kyrgyzstan thread. I don't see any significant relationship between MHL and your post above (#465). It would be a bit like posting about the Australian government and it's policies and the economy in the BHP, RIO, etc. threads.
If you owned this stock you probably would have.
btw: This thread is MHL... not CIG.
Yes I do own both.
My point was the information you were posting was about more than just MHL and I felt it belonged in a separate thread since it affected more than just one stock and to be honest didn't interest me. Others obviously think differently. No offence was intended (as I stated at the start) so I will shut up.
Now let's get back to MHL.
As a holder of MHL I am interested in the comments made by Doris as I think it is very relevant to the fortunes of MHL. Please keep up the good work Doris.
Dont entirely agree. Politics play a much greater role in a company’s success in less stable political environments such as Kyrgyzstan and are therefore much more relevant
I for one appreciate Doris saving me the research time.
Exactly right for instance how bout last year when johnie announced plans for nuclear plants and the investigation into the feasability, we had a U stock "boom" as such and they ran hot like iron ore for a while.
And in such a fledgling economy that MHL has to work in I think any update is important. If the government there takes either a western or eastern side will greatly affect MHL and CIG's prospects. Remember this is the only place on earth where the US and Russia have military bases in the same country!
Doris your posts have been great and I look forward to reading more from you. Initially I too was taken aback when you first mentioned the political environment in that little 'stan region but the absolute relevance struck me when reading Key Petroleum's homepage (Ted Ellyard territory);
'...exploration risk prospects in prospective areas located in politically stable countries.'
I hold MHL albeit a little nervously.
not really up on kyrgyz politics like I once was, so will be intrigued to learn of the election outcome
chairman spencer does have 20 years experience in aust foreign service's service in the region so would likely be no stranger to the main players
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7145133.stm
Not sure what to make of the political change,
But it didn't seem to bother Macquarie who have taken 5% of CIG at an avg of 12c I think
They must have faith in CIG's prospectivity and potential to do that wouldn't you think?
hey young
is there a time frame for when the they start drilling to look for oil?
and all other drilling in general.
Hey mate, 6-12months I'd say,
But it should only take a few weeks to get drill targets via seismic interpretation,
Now this is the important part as once targets are defined, speculative valuations can be given by brokerage firms for drill success, as I have shown a 100M bl discovery = 50c value to MHL's 15% interest, at a 10% EV = 5c which is still well above current prices,
$18m mkt cap
Great management, ex HDR, DYL and so on
Great Elephant sized targets with funded/carried interest
Prospective Uranium projects
Looking for new projects
Ticks the boxes for a great 10 bagger spec for me
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?