Greetings --
I ran the test of the crossover alone against the 500 stocks that are currently components of the S&P 500, from 1/1/2000 through 12/14/2010. (Because of survivorship bias, the results will over-estimate performance.)
I consider the Monday part and the portfolio part to be secondary. If the base algorithm is reasonably profitable, then they can be added.
In AmiBroker:
// ASF_StochLongTerm.afl
SetTradeDelays (0,0,0,0);
BuyPrice = Open;
SellPrice = Open;
weekDays = DayOfWeek();
BuyR = 1; //weekDays == 1;
SellR = 1; //weekDays == 1;
Buy = Cross(StochD(55,39,3), 20) AND BuyR;
Sell = Cross(80, StochD(55,39,3)) AND SellR;
----------------------------------------
For the 500 stocks and 11 years:
Median exposure is about 30%
Median Compound Annual Rate of Return (CAR) is about 1%
Median Return While Invested (RAR) is about 3.5%
Median Maximum Drawdown is about 55%
Median CAR/MDD is about 0.02.
Median k-ratio is 0.004.
Median Number of Trades in 11 years is 5.
Median Bars held per trade is about 170.
Whether trading only on Monday adds value or not, my first assessment is:
I am risking drawdowns in the range of 55% to make 1% a year and able to compound my account about every 26 months.
Terminal Wealth Relative, a ratio of final account balance to initial balance is:
TWR = (1+GM)^N
where GM is the geometric mean of the trade, N is the number of trades, and ^ indicates raised to the power.
With holding periods so long and CAR so low, assume GM can be replaced by CAR.
So TWR = (1.01)^5 = 1.051
Assuming the future resembles the past, which is implicit in all our analysis -- fundamental or technical, long term or short.
My final balance in 11 years will be about 5% higher than my initial balance today, but I will suffer a 55% drawdown somewhere along the way.
I want:
GM to be high.
N to be high.
CAR/MDD greater than 1.0.
k-ratio around 0.10.
The "sweet spot" for a trading system that will be traded to maximize terminal wealth while controlling risk is a holding period of a few days, 50 or more trades per year, and an accuracy rate of 60% or higher. When possible, add the ability and willingness to use leveraged trading instruments.
Longer holding periods, less frequent trading, and lower accuracy, all make creating a high final balance very difficult, even if the ratio of average amount won to amount lost is high.
I do not consider the system described to be a good system under any circumstances -- swing or long term -- and it certainly cannot be traded in any way that creates a high final balance.
Thanks for listening,
Howard