This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Long term blue chip investment

Jump to new
W

warrior12

Joined
23 June 2013
Posts
4
Reactions
0
Hi guys. First I'd like to tell you guys a bit about myself then I'll get in to the topic. I am a 20 year that is looking for work but has 10k in the bank, which gives me 35 dollars a month interest. I am going to do blue chips because I want to get comfortable first and get the hang of trading before I start going deeper.


My risk tolerance is very low, I mean I would hate to lose money (I guess we all would) I have no income coming in, so what I lose is what I cant make up for..

Blue chips is something I am interested in, big and well known company's wont go bankrupted ( there's always a chance it could go bankrupted but minimizing the risk is important)

Let's say I bought 10000 dollars worth of either Woolworth, Westfield, or the big four banks and the shares increased in value but decreased a bit, now that would make me go crazy even seeing a decrease sign would make me not be able to sleep at night, but for a noob I think that is normal but for a professional or a well experience person its normal and they can still have a good night sleep. I wouldn't be able to though.
My question is, in the long term would I make a profit I mean I am talking about 10 years + here of holding that share, seeing it increase and decrease and times.

In the long run is it worth it? Am I going to hold on a share for 9 years then see 100% of my 10000 dollars go?
I know some of you will say that its impossible to know what the future holds for these company's or that we cant answer these questions because we don't know what's going to happen in 10 years.
I understand there but what I am asking is regarding a company that has a huge history behind it and has went through hell financially but at the end came back up. company's that we use everyday.

My goal is to hold on to 4-6 different types of well known blue chip company's for years I am talking 20-30 years and adding more money on to it every month or every year. I save a lot and I give up my social life to do so, I save 95% of my money and did that when I was working before I got laid off. When I do have a job and have these shares (if i have these shares) I would add 2k every month for 20-30 years or whatever. I am not looking to make big money in a short time I want to see my shares go up in value every year or so but is that even possible?


I know I repeated myself a few times on this but I want to make sure you guy's understand what I am trying to say, Its a bit hard to do so when you're a noob and dont even understand half of the words that investors/traders use haha.


Thank you in advance and i hope to learn a lot from you experienced people.
 
If I were in your position, at your age, I might invest the $10K into just 2 shares that i chose carefully, I would be looking for successful, well managed companies that had a history of growing earnings and had some sort of competitive advantage. Companies that I thought were in sustainable, long term businesses that provided something we need and will continue to need. (supermarkets, banks, etc.).

I would continue to purchase more of each as I had sufficient savings, and I would not look at the price. The price will go up and down with the market, but over time, if i had chosen well, my shares would have good capital growth, I would have received earnings through dividends to reinvest and compounding of the income and my added savings would have magically created wealth!

You do need the right temperament for a buy and hold strategy to work, you have to ignore the day to day price of the shares, there are only two prices you need to look at, the price you pay to buy and the price you receive if and when you sell, the rest is just noise.

You also have to resist the temptation of activity, its not easy to do almost nothing in the market!

Remember all of the above is just one ignorant persons impressions, opinions and ideas, its not advice and there will plenty happy to explain why what i suggest is nonsense and explain why the opposite makes more sense!

More than anything, read, talk, listen, question, read and read all you can about investing, finance, shares and all related subjects and you will come to your own path in time.
 

If this is the case, then I don't believe the stock market is for you.

No one is going to guarantee you the profit after 10 years that you are seeking. The long term trend indicates that you should gain one, but any number of occurrences that are out of your control during that time period could decimate your investment ie. GFCs, world wars, legislation changes, alien invasion ...... be prepared for anything.

You are obviously not comfortable with the thought of losing money. You should only invest what you are comfortable losing, or can afford to lose.

Are you maximising the interest you could be getting on your $10k? If not research other options in this area.

No investment is worth losing your peace of mind. Losing sleep affects every other facet of your life (socially, work related, communications, family, friends), so may have further reaching consequences than you anticipate.
 
I agree with everything Springhill has said. Clearly, your $10K is not money you can afford to lose and it would upset you immensely if that were to happen.

I don't think for a moment you could do as Galumay suggests and put it into a couple of so called blue chips and forget it. (I don't think that's ever a sound strategy, for that matter, even without consideration of your specific need for capital preservation.)

Perhaps spend some time understanding the current and potential global situation. If you do that, it's my guess you will be even more reluctant to take risks at the present time.

As Springhill has said, worry and losing sleep over investments is immensely damaging especially if you are not currently employed. I'd much prefer for you to make capital preservation your priority.
Have a look at http://www.infochoice.com.au/?pid=infochoice
for comparisons of cash rates available, even if you choose this option until the current situation settles somewhat.
 

While I suspect you and Springhill are correct, and the OP doesn't really sound like he would be comfortable with any level of share investment, to suggest buy, accumulate, dividend reinvestment and hold is never a sound strategy is odd.

I can think of many examples where that exact strategy with sensibly chosen shares would have led to enormous wealth creation. It does take time and inactivity, and of course it requires careful selection of great companies.

Of course its not a strategy that suits a lot of people, but that doesnt make the strategy itself unsound.
 

+1
It takes a good amount of trust in your own skills.
 
francopolli1 said:
+1
It takes a good amount of trust in your own skills.
Click to expand...

At 20 you have time on your side to make up for mistakes BUT with no job you may need that $10k for something more immediate. Try virtual investing first for a time to gain experience and once you have a a regular income you may have sorted out your risk tolerance. I have been investing for 2.5 years and am 56 so relatively green but I certainly got my risk tolerance sorted!!
Don't feel pressured into committing YOUR money into shares until you absorb the good comments from above posters.
 
You have described youtself as an investor with no risk tolerance. As such I beleive you should stick to term deposits or at-call accounts...if you invest in the market its almost certain that you will at times see negative returns.

Have a look at the 10 year charts of some of the companies you consider blue chips. You will find some are higher, some are lower.. also you must consider the dividends paid over this period and the effect of inflation (i.e if BHP was $30 ten years ago, and is still $30 today - that is a loss as inflation should increase your investment at ~3% a year just to break even).
 
galumay said:
While I suspect you and Springhill are correct, and the OP doesn't really sound like he would be comfortable with any level of share investment, to suggest buy, accumulate, dividend reinvestment and hold is never a sound strategy is odd.
Click to expand...
What other strategies have you actually tried, galumay?
Do you think it might be possible that there are other strategies which are way more capital protective as well as protective of profits?

Just look at the last few years. Prior to the GFC our market peaked at around 6800. It essentially halved in the ensuing year. It is still a long way off regaining the previous high.

Why would you hold your p/f through that when you could simply follow the trend and exit when the downturn began, keeping most of your capital and profits intact? Most of us are not smart enough to time the exact top or bottom but you can get close. The cash you released at start of GFC is going to buy you a lot more shares, thus bring in a lot more dividends and franking credits, when those same shares are half the price.

If your share investing is a sideline or hobby and your cost of living is totally financed by other income such as salary etc, and you can't be bothered taking a more hands on approach, then, sure, buy and hold over a lifetime might work well for you. I don't, however, consider it a remotely sensible approach if you need to generate a living from your investments alone. With an invested balance of several million, then yes, probably the dividends and franking are going to allow you to be cavalier about the performance of your capital. I don't know too many people in such a position where they can afford to see their capital halve, such loss being in no way replaced by said dividends and franking.

You said earlier:

You would not look at the price???? Sorry, but there's no way I could ever agree with that.
Maybe consider the market darlings pre 2008, such as ABC Learning, Allco Finance, et al which were simply obliterated. Not looking at the price there wouldn't have worked out too well.

Valuesnatcher, good example with BHP and inflation.
 

I agree with you, Julia, you can't blindly ignore price action and ignore fundamentals. However, I think the key paragraph in galumay's post was about carefully selecting a few quality blue chips. Obviously if you approach trading/investing from a technical perspective then business fundamentals aren't so important but if you want to build a quality "buy and hold" portfolio then fundamentals are absolutely necessary. I do think it is achieveable and easier than many might think, IMO. Pre-GFC "buy and hold" was just about getting your money into the market ASAP so you didn't miss out on the gains on offer.
 
Julia said:
Do you think it might be possible that there are other strategies which are way more capital protective as well as protective of profits?
Click to expand...

With respect, thats a strawman argument Julia, I never suggested there were not other strategies, I was challenging your claim that buy and hold is never a sound strategy.
 
BTW, i steered away from using specific stocks in my defence of Buy and Hold as a valid strategy for the obvious reason. The use of specific examples like BHP and ABC Learning to challenge my contention go a long way to proving my point that its not helpful to use specific examples.

To illustrate the problem, a counter point is that my Aunt invested a modest inheritance some 40 years ago into BHP, she re invested dividends into BHP, accepted share issues, distributions, whatever else BHP did in those 40 years, she added any savings as she could to the holding, and she held forever. On that single investment she is now a multi millionaire.

Have a look at the wealth created if you invest in WOW when they float and practice buy & hold with them!

Just like any strategy, with hindsight its possible to find specific examples to demonstrate how successful it can be - and equally other examples to demonstrate how destructive it can be!
 

There in lies the problem i have with buy and hold...

Was she just lucky? Or was she well enough informed so that she knew BHP would be a sound business in the future?

Warren made a ton of good calls early on too, using the brand as well to make those types of decisions.

With this method though, you must be committed to holding through the market downturns, which have been significant enough in my lifetime already to completely wipe out 401k's...

There is no exit other than bankruptcy in Buy and Hold. There is no way to cut losers short and let winners run.

CanOz
 
Why not? Quoting just a few examples demonstrates the point of your imo fallacious suggestion to "never look at what the price is doing". Countless people have put money into companies they believe they have properly investigated and are convinced they are winners. The best companies can meet with unexpected headwinds which will see your investment massively reduced. I would contend that any beginner is unlikely to have the skills to be absolutely right in all instances.

And further on your suggestion that using specific examples is unhelpful, ignore those and just look at the XAO over the time period I've referred to. It demonstrates my point. Nearly five years later we are still significantly below the previous high and look like descending well and truly further.

And you accuse me of presenting a straw man argument!!!
Whatever results your aunt achieved, what you are ignoring is the potential result of what she could have achieved following a more hands on active approach. For the reasons I set out earlier, such a trend following or swing trading approach would likely have seen her even more well off.

Have a look at the wealth created if you invest in WOW when they float and practice buy & hold with them!
Click to expand...
Sigh. Over how many years? You are apparently so sure of yourself that you are not even considering that a different approach over the same number of years could yield a much better result, given the appropriate education, skills and experience.

I had the vague memory, galumay, that you are a recent entrant to the market, so spent about two minutes to see if I was correct. I found this from 30 May 2013.

And this from from February 2013
I am still to determine the most suitable strategy for myself, as readers of my thread on the subject will know I have been on a journey of learning prior to investing my capital in the market.
Click to expand...

From January 2013
Yep, I got it too, thats why I decided early on the TA approach wasnt for me. As was pointed out though, thank god for the TA's and the emotional gamblers, without them it would be damn hard to find any value in the market!
Click to expand...

And from just a few days ago

This last showing a descriptor of TA as "voodoo". Have you even for a moment considered your opinion is so constructed because you simply do not understand even basic charting?

All up, perhaps consider that when you actually have a few years of experience in the market with real money in real conditions, your dogmatic assurances as to what strategies are valid and what are not might alter somewhat.
On the other hand, maybe not. People who have, even as beginners, closed their minds to alternative strategies will rarely ever even find out how they could have done better.

Exactly.

Galumay, we all started somewhere. Probably many of us with the old buy and hold approach. It works well in a rising market.
I'm sure you don't mean to come across as claiming to have everything sorted with just a few weeks in the market.
After 25 or so years, even now I'm learning all the time and still make mistakes.
 
Julia said:
Why not?
Click to expand...

For the reasons I gave, I thought pretty clearly?


Given that my original post in reply to the OP was suggesting a possible long erm strategy for investment by a 20year old starting out, a cycle of 5 years is not really relevant.


And you accuse me of presenting a straw man argument!!!
Click to expand...

I didnt accuse you of it, i pointed out that it was. My relating of my Aunt's experience isnt.


Who knows what other potential results of different approaches might have been? For a start its hyperthetical, whereas her dollars are in the bank. Of course another approach MIGHT have worked better, but equally we saw plenty of investors lose their shirts in the same period using other approachs.


Sigh. Over how many years? You are apparently so sure of yourself that you are not even considering that a different approach over the same number of years could yield a much better result, given the appropriate education, skills and experience.
Click to expand...

*sigh* Over the number of years since the float. Once again you are using strawman arguments, i never dismissed alternative approachs, i merely suggested in very ambliviant terms a possible course of action I might have chosen if i were that age. Different approaches will have different results, some better, some worse.

I had the vague memory, galumay, that you are a recent entrant to the market, so spent about two minutes to see if I was correct. I found this from 30 May 2013.
Click to expand...

A recent re-entrant actually, i lost the lot in the past using a different approach!

This last showing a descriptor of TA as "voodoo". Have you even for a moment considered your opinion is so constructed because you simply do not understand even basic charting?.
Click to expand...

Actually as I said its my background in mathmatics that makes it impossible for me to have any confidence in it. Its like asking a biologist to suscribe to creation.


Lucky i am not easily offended! "dogmatic" is just about the opposite of my style, might i gently suggest that its not just investment where one needs to understrand the importance of adopting strategies that suit our personalities, that is not to dismiss that alternatives may suit others better.


Julia, I am sure you didnt mean to suggest I have claimed to have 'everything' sorted.

I am going to leave this discussion here, I dont mind explaining my thought processes, but I dont really enjoy this sort of adversarial approach.
 
Just a brief note that I have decided to move this thread from Beginner's Lounge to the Medium/Long Term Investing forum.

Although it is a beginner thread, I feel it is more at home in the Medium/Long Term Investing forum as it is primary concerned with long term investing.
 
galumay said:
A recent re-entrant actually, i lost the lot in the past using a different approach!
Click to expand...

I dont really enjoy this sort of adversarial approach.
Click to expand...

Me neither. However, when we have the information from the OP that

then advice to use all of that $10,000 in the market at this very volatile and unpredictable time and not look at the price is something I can't help questioning.
If Warrior is unemployed, that $10K should surely be available to him as emergency funds for any unexpected event that might arise. If he needed money (not too unlikely if he is existing on the unemployment benefit), he could be a forced seller of some shares at a time when the SP was significantly down, incurring the sort of loss he clearly says he would find intolerable.

and my added savings would have magically created wealth!
Click to expand...
And a capital loss could equally magically create loss of what wealth Warrior has.

PS Warrior, it might not be much, but Rabodirect has at call account offering 4.76% which would give you just under $40 per month, slightly better than your current $35. Various other options on the infochoice link I provided earlier.
Good luck in your employment quest.
 
Corporate profit margins (which are mean reverting unless capitalism itself is broken) as a % of GDP, near or at all time highs (depending on the economy you examine).

Fundamental ratios near or at all time highs.

Interest rates near or at all time lows.

Given these factors, how is a buy and hold approach expected to generate a nominal return above the rate you get from loaning your money to the bank?

Investing in a buy and hold type approach now, with an expectation of above deposit rate returns, is only a bet that:

* Interest rates stay low or go lower
* Fundamental ratios become even more expensive
* Corporate profit margins take a larger and larger share of GDP (i.e. capitalism is broken)

Which means that if any of those 3 factors don't eventuate, you lose the bet and an almost guaranteed capital loss in real terms.

Using BHP is simply a horrible example, because you'd have to find a small mining company which is set to be an ASX20 company in the future, and then bet that another mining boom of equal or greater magnitude is on its way.
 
galumay said:
Actually as I said its my background in mathmatics that makes it impossible for me to have any confidence in it. Its like asking a biologist to suscribe to creation.
Click to expand...

Its this part here galumay that really had me stumped. Who do you think designs the complex algorithms that the evil Goldman and JPM employ to beat the market? Voodoo doctors?

Technical Analysis and algorithmic trading IS based on math and psychology.

CanOz
 
I'm of the opinion everyone needs minimum 10k available to them in case of emergency, illness, job loss, move or whatever.

You've got a great start. I'd continue to save and use anything on top of this for investments/ trades/ girls/ whatever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Long term plan to invest in a few ETFs
Replies
13
Views
2K
Value Collector
W
Improving stock portfolio performance
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Value Collector
S
Has anyone been able to time ETF’s for a long period?
Replies
4
Views
702
investor13
Best broker for long term investing
Replies
1
Views
604
Chipp
Can you make money investing in watches?
2
Replies
26
Views
929
Knobby22
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...