Inflation is an increase in the money supply and one of the potential symptoms of this is price rising.
Price changes due to a supply demand imbalance in the good/service or the unit used to pay for the good/service. Changing pressures in any quadrant will alter price, it doesn't matter how uniform or not a change in any quadrant is, as in your example. In your example supply would respond in short order and only if we had an increased pool of money would prices settle at a new high.
Inflation is a simple notion yet it acts in complex ways and with a lag, not an easy thing to attempt to control given our systems.
exactly why they promote minimum wages...
if the minimum wage was $0, would people work for $0? can people earn more than the minimum? how many would be paid at the minimum?
Old bull**** video.
Because that is not a riddle it is :
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/disingenuous
and
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/asinine
Old bull**** video.
Inflation is measured as a general increase in the price of goods and services. There are considerations for substitutions and improved quality but they're far from perfect.
If all the tradespeople in an area suddenly got raised to 1.5 mill a year, they'd stop buying bread and start having their breakfast cooked by the restaurant industry the CPI just wouldn't' be able to handle that sort of a shift and would assume people still have bread for breakfast when working out the weighted basket of goods. Meanwhile 3 out of the 4 town bakeries have closed down and all the bread being sold now costs $4 instead of $1 an the price of restaurant cooked food has gone through the roof as the 1.5M tradie will glady pay for it.
The person on minimum wage say $17 an hour, is stuck eating $4 loaves of bread.
In your world, there is now only one bakery in the town and a fancy restaurant. The bakery employees are now all unemployed, leaving the remaining bakery to increase it's price to $5.
The end result is less jobs - less bakeries and due to monopolistic position is raises the price to $6. People are broke and hungry.
In my world 10% of income is spent on bread, bread went up 400% means you get a 40% raise in the minimum wage which means all of the bakeries stay operational, selling bread at $4 a loaf to workers on $23.8 an hour enough to keep pace with the increased price of bread due to a re-structuring of the economy.
My shares in the bread company continue to increase by 8% every six months and everyone is happy - inflation also bumps up those share prices and the bread company retains profitability AND there is a booming restaurant industry in the town.
Oh, the tradies however, extracting maximum utility due to the monopoly position of their labour can only extract $7 an hour less from the company as it has to pay an increased minimum wage.
End result - bread companies more profitable - restaurant and tradies slightly less profitable winners compensated the losers.
A few tradies are pissed off that poor people can afford bread. We call them "austrian school economists"
LOL... I just had to preserve this gem.
And you are the guy telling people they are spouting nonsense.
DUDE! If you can't see why that is wrong NO ONE can help you.
Take the blue pill and let the fantasy resume.
Don't go into business, your head would explode having to deal with free market realities!
BUT
Thanks for the chuckle.
solid argument, im laying bets that Mr Magoo isn't a sydney uni arts student working in a cafe
You're depending on an argument from a first year introductory text book which has been proven to have no practical application at all.
I personally hate people.
This would explain the desire to pursue destructive economic policy!
Even if that was the case, cite reference please, the argument is very sound and it stands head and shoulders above NO ARGUMENT AT ALL!
Come on dufus U can do better than that!:
I just gave you an entire page of references.
It is obvious I'm being trolled.
If you have some emperical evidence I would love to see it. I am happy to be proven wrong.
Not for that last claim you didn't. You LIE!
Come now Gloria, complain to a mod if you feel an affront upon your person has tarnished your, ahem, impeccable reputation.
After you my dear fellow... but we get ahead of ourselves, first you should present a logical argument... a coherent thesis as to why peoples asses don't get fired when employers are forced to pay them too much!
Pssssst.... you are talking to someone who has actually replaced low paid positions with better equipment and fewer but more highly paid operators due to minimum wage requirements.
Before you call me heartless the move defended the company, giving the rest of the employees greater security, my first duty was to actually stay in business.
Ya see kid I have actually been there and done it...
You'd be surprised to find I've actually been involved with similar obviously not controlling all of it myself and the funniest part is that it was nothing to do with minimum wage. Infact the low skilled workers were already on more than that.
You're depending on an argument from a first year introductory text book which has been proven to have no practical application at all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?