- Joined
- 3 May 2009
- Posts
- 515
- Reactions
- 2
Just announced by Alan Kohler on ABC that he will have Peter Bond as a guest on Inside Business on ABC1 on Sunday at 10.00 am.
Hopefully this will spread the good news further and help push the S/P higher next week.
I'll be looking forward to that with interest.
I thought by today we would be around the 2.20 to 2.50 mark on the strength of that deal.
I'd laugh my ass off at the sellers at 1.75 if he said on Sunday they had decided to monetise the royalty stream and put another 1.5 billion in the bank next week through UBS.
Anyway after I got over my initial shock at seeing the price that low on Wednesdays close I went balls deep and brought T3 at my limit thinking it couldn't possibly fall any further.
Had a coffee on Thursday open and hit the sell button at 10.30 for the easiest money I ever made.
Profit from pain I'd call it.
Looking at the balance of my account takes all the pain away
Good article in The Australian summing up LNC situation and history. Finishes on the note that LNC has 341 tenements around the world. Obviously all there for UCG and/or oil-gas development.
Discusses LNC history and the historical connection with Couger.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...mining-technique/story-e6frg8zx-1225902296719
The Inside Business interview with Alan Kohler was very informative. Some points made by PB-
1. Cost of constructing a 20,000 Barrel GTL plant in Australia is rising (probably over AUD 1B) and 40% more than overseas.
2. Looking at constructing smaller modular units in Asia.
3. First GTL plant could be outside Australia.
4.While they have the capacity to build GTL facility by themselves they may
do a joint venture with a partner who brings more than $$$ to the venture and lessen the business risk.
5. This could likely include an Oil company .
6. They are about at least 2 years from commercial diesel production as construction would take about 20 months.
Any other views on the interview ?
Thanks for the summary of the interview Mickel.
As usual Peter Bond tales a big picture view. One can quickly see what it would cost a lot more to build a GTL plant in Australia rather than Asia. Labour costs, construction costs, probably compliance. And given that fuel is sold at world market rates (I believe) it immediately makes commercial sense to site a plant where it is most cost effective.
Not sure how that commercial view stands with the idea of national fuel self sufficiency however. If we accept the analysis that Peak oil is well and truly here and will impact within a few years should Australia have locally produced fuel rather than relying on importing it from overseas ? Just a thought.
Can also see why Peter might want a tie in with the oil companies in constructing the plant. In a real sense LNC would become part of Big Oil benefiting from their technological capacities as well as their political muscle.
Was anything mentioned about power generation and the role of the Alkaline Fuel Cell in producing clean electricity ?
Interesting interview.
Less spin from PB and more hard facts.
One of my concerns with LNC has been the cash burn which is very high for a company that's hasn't made any revenue.
To hear PB this morning talking costs assuaged my fears somewhat.
He sounds like he is driving LNC to the most cost effective and profitable outcome for shareholders.
Offshore fabrication and modularisation of the gtl plant to save on capex is the go.
Sounds like the SA plant is a likely jv and given BP has a mou to buy 70% of all production they must be the most likely jv partner.
That will really derisk the development costs.
As for the gtl technology he sounds very confident in the process.
Why shouldn't he be sasol have been doing it for donkeys years.
LNC is really on track now imho and a great long term hold.
Being sure is what the markets are all about isn't it?
it seems the market isn't sure that Adani is going to mine the galillee tenement for 50-60 millon tonnes of coal pa.
The alternative is they have brought the tenements for half a billion dollars cash so they can have some nice hockey fields.
I hear the Indians play a mean game of hockey.
Personally i'm of the opinion they are going to go all out to dig it up and ship it off to an energy hungry Indian power grid as soon as feasibly possible with all the resources at their disposal.
That is of course a bit of a rumour.
When the royalty stream is monetised or received that will be the fact.
On current market response roughly 2.5 billions dollars worth.
Either that coal is going to be very difficult and expensive to mine, Adani has no idea what they are buying or the Australian investment community has their heads up their arses.
i continue to hold LNC and my opinions reflect the above.
According to a couple of NGO's based in europe, India is in the process of constructing 94 coal fired power generating stations. All to be completed and "on stream" by the end of 2013.
In addition, planning permission, and feasibility studies are in the works for a further 300, mainly coal fired plants.
They need coal fast![/QUOTE
Rumours nothing more.
No value in that sort of talk.
None whatsoever.
Cash on the table now or no value.
:
Just announced by Alan Kohler on ABC that he will have Peter Bond as a guest on Inside Business on ABC1 on Sunday at 10.00 am.
Hopefully this will spread the good news further and help push the S/P higher next week.
Interesting interview with Peter Bond. One thing I noticed was almost the complete downplay of the CSG process. Seemed to suggest there just might not be enough money in it.
And yet the whole SA deal is based around building a 300-500 MW power station fueled by CSG. And perhaps even using alkaline fuel cells.
Maybe he is just playing possum at the moment.
____________________________________________________
Will be interesting to see how the market opens tomorrow. At some stage the analysts and the various funds will have to start adding up the value and opportunities that LNC offers. Even it's only for the cash value of the coal sales
Firstly, just to clarify terms used, I'm sure Basilio, that you meant UCG (Underground Coal Gasification) and not CSG (Coal Seam Gas).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?