You miss the point, or perhaps just decline to see it. If the TGA were to approve cannabis for medical use, making it available via prescription on the PBS, that would likely inspire sudden, intractable back or other difficult to disprove pain on the part of so called recreational users, thus providing the taxpayer with the wonderful opportunity to fund their drug use.
Julia said:Of course they are and so they should be. I didn't suggest the laws re advertising in Australia would be changed. I said
Julia said:Who exactly is 'giving out free samples of fentanyl'? It's an opioid much more potent than morphine.
It would be a logical progression if it's considered by the TGA to be medically necessary.Who said it would be on the PBS?
Then again, oxycontin seems to be the come down drug of choice these days, and it's on the PBS.
That doesn't constitute a 'free sample'. From what I can tell from your link the patient would have to have a doctor's prescription for the drug which would be available from various different pharmaceutical companies.
Julia said:That doesn't constitute a 'free sample'. From what I can tell from your link the patient would have to have a doctor's prescription for the drug which would be available from various different pharmaceutical companies.
Presumably this is advertising from one of those companies which are competing for the legitimate medically prescribed business.
And then how do you know the drug has been legitimately medically prescribed, as opposed to just finding a doctor who will prescribe it after the patient saw the ad and the lure of free supply and shopped around?
FORMER FENTANYL USER: Most drug users just go themselves and get other people to go as well. Yeah, you just gotta - just tell the doctor it's for back pain. That's what I used to do. And, yeah, after a while you get to be able to pick the doctors surgeries that'll write it or most drug users all talk and, yeah, find out which doctor surgeries do it and which doctor surgeries don't. In the country towns, I have had six doctors at one stage.
JOHN STEWART: Dr Zador says that most doctors in country towns are aware of doctor shopping, but fentanyl is still being made available to drug addicts.
DEBORAH ZADOR: Most doctors do their best with patients who have pain. Most patients handle their medications responsibly, but there's always a small number of doctors and a small number of patients who will fall through the cracks and a lot of this problem can be brought about by a even just a small number of prescribers.
I haven't done much research but for controlling seizures etc. it isn't THC but a different component. That means strains can be developed that have THC low enough to not be desired by potheads. Such strains could be grown for medicinal uses and regulated.
Charlotte's Web (cannabis)
Charlotte's Web is a strain of medical marijuana processed into a marijuana extract[1] that is high in cannabidiol (CBD) content, called Realm Oil and Alepsia. It does not induce the psychoactive "high" typically associated with recreational marijuana use.
The Charlotte's Web strain is named after Charlotte Figi, whose story has led to her being described as "the girl who is changing medical marijuana laws across America."[2] Her parents and physicians say she experienced a reduction of her epileptic seizures after her first dose of medical marijuana at five years of age. Her usage of the strain was featured in the 2013 CNN documentary "Weed". Media coverage increased demand for Realm Oil and similar products high in CBD, which has been used to treat epilepsy in toddlers and children. While high profile and anecdotal reports have sparked interest in treatment with cannabinoids,[3] there is insufficient medical evidence to draw conclusions about their safety or efficacy.[3][4]
Families who say they have run out of pharmaceutical options have moved to Colorado to access the strain. The demand has spurred calls for more research to determine whether these products actually do what is claimed. While the use of medical marijuana products is allowed in many U.S. states, the nationwide legal status of Realm Oil is less clear, but bills in several states are legalizing use of this particular form of medical marijuana, even though other uses of cannabis are still forbidden in some of those states.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte's_Web_(cannabis)
The point is that a doctor has presumably assessed the patient and determined that there is a need for the drug.What do you call giving someone a month's free supply of a powerful, highly addictive, dangerous drug? If someone is at the point of truly needing fentanyl they require it with or without the free supply. And then how do you know the drug has been legitimately medically prescribed, as opposed to just finding a doctor who will prescribe it after the patient saw the ad and the lure of free supply and shopped around?
Not trying to sound too argumentative here, Julia.
Natalie was interviewed on 7:30 Tasmania in the last half hour. I don't know how long ago it was recorded but she had no hair on her head.
Tight controls like with various other drugs should be managable. A Tasmanian company wants to have trials and are advocating it as a secondary pain relief, that is use more traditional painkillers before moving on to it if needed.
Charlotte's Web (cannabis)
Charlotte's Web is a strain of medical marijuana processed into a marijuana extract[1] that is high in cannabidiol (CBD) content, called Realm Oil and Alepsia. It does not induce the psychoactive "high" typically associated with recreational marijuana use.
The Charlotte's Web strain is named after Charlotte Figi, whose story has led to her being described as "the girl who is changing medical marijuana laws across America."[2] Her parents and physicians say she experienced a reduction of her epileptic seizures after her first dose of medical marijuana at five years of age. Her usage of the strain was featured in the 2013 CNN documentary "Weed". Media coverage increased demand for Realm Oil and similar products high in CBD, which has been used to treat epilepsy in toddlers and children. While high profile and anecdotal reports have sparked interest in treatment with cannabinoids,[3] there is insufficient medical evidence to draw conclusions about their safety or efficacy.[3][4]
Families who say they have run out of pharmaceutical options have moved to Colorado to access the strain. The demand has spurred calls for more research to determine whether these products actually do what is claimed. While the use of medical marijuana products is allowed in many U.S. states, the nationwide legal status of Realm Oil is less clear, but bills in several states are legalizing use of this particular form of medical marijuana, even though other uses of cannabis are still forbidden in some of those states.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte's_Web_(cannabis)
SURROUNDED by thousands of packages of marijuana, Seattle’s top prosecutor needed some advice: Which one should he buy?
A new day, indeed.
Twenty months after voters legalised recreational cannabis for adults over 21, Washington state’s first few licensed pot shops opened for business, catering to hundreds of customers who lined up outside, thrilled to be a part of the historic moment.
The pot being sold at a handful of stores in Seattle, Bellingham, Prosser and Spokane was regulated, tested for impurities, heavily taxed and in short supply ”” such short supply that several other shops couldn’t open because they had nothing to sell.
Pete Holmes, Seattle’s elected city attorney and a main backer of the state’s recreational marijuana law, said he wanted to be one of the first customers to demonstrate there are alternatives to the nation’s failed drug war.
“This is a tectonic shift in public policy,” he said. “You have to honour it. This is real. This is legal. This is a wonderful place to purchase marijuana where it’s out of the shadows.”
CHIEF Commissioner Ken Lay says police were just doing their job when they entered a Melbourne mum’s home and confiscated cannabis oil that she was using to treat her son.
Epping Sexual Offences and Child Abuse police raided Cassie Batten and Rhett Wallace’s home in Mernda, 30km northeast of the CBD, on July 11.
After the oil was taken, Ms Batten said it was only a matter of time until her three-year-old son, Cooper, ended up in hospital.
Ms Batten said police confiscated cannabis oil used to treat son Cooper, who has severe brain damage, cerebral abscesses, hydrocephalus, epilepsy and cerebral palsy.
“We’ve already seen some seizures,’’ Ms Batten said.
“It’s just a matter of time now until he ends up back in hospital.”
Ms Batten said Cooper ”” who doctors thought would die after bacterial meningitis left him with the severe disabilities ”” used to suffer seizures lasting up to an hour and a half, but the illegal oil kept him alive.
She said her son was almost seizure-free and was taken off eight other medication types after using the oil.
The couple were released pending further inquiries, but Ms Batten said they faced charges including possessing a drug of dependence, and introducing a drug of dependence into the body of another.
DB, this isn't directed at you, its a general statement.
Why do they use these emotive cases to push to legalise drugs?
As has been stated, once legalised, the marketing targets the kids.
We are already the top in the world for recreational drugs and Mental Health is booming.
Who pays to look after these people when it all goes pear shaped.
I don't agree with these Greens policies for drugs and death.
The street price definitely increases and decreases based on the success of law enforcement, but it has relatively minimal impact on the risk / reward benefits for the suppliers.
The point is that a doctor has presumably assessed the patient and determined that there is a need for the drug.
Supplying one month without charge doesn't change that. It's probably a common marketing ploy in a country which permits consumer advertising of pharmaceutical products. I think it's crap, but I don't make the laws in the USA.
Julia said:I don't know what you mean when you ask "how do you know the drug has been legitimately medically prescribed? " Obviously if a patient has a genuine prescription from a registered medical practitioner then it has been legitimately prescribed.
Julia said:People have always doctor shopped. They always will. It's a case of policing the doctor, something which I can assure you does happen. It just doesn't get publicised.
Julia said:Ok, so let's say we legalise cannabis for medical use. What is then to stop every pothead in the country availing themselves of it, perhaps even on the PBS, by claiming that their intractable pain has failed to respond to all known currently legitimate analgesia, and therefore they must qualify for access to prescribed cannabis?
I'm sure you don't seriously think someone addicted to marijuana in whatever form, if it were made legal as an analgesic, is going to rock up to the GP and say "hey, I love this stuff: write me a script for it, willya?"I mean prescribed for a legitimate illness, rather than just to feed an addiction.
I haven't seen any randomised, double blind, crossover, controlled trials on cannabis as an analgesic.If people are doctor shopping for fentanyl, they will for cannabis, I have no doubt of that. But do you deny the legitimate users, or worse, for them onto the black market, because of the abuse of the system by others?
So your recreational user gains 'legitimate' access to his drug of choice, and if on the PBS, the taxpayer funds it.
Well, duh! Just what I've now said several times!!I think you know what I mean: One can fein illness and get a script.
DB, this isn't directed at you, its a general statement.
Why do they use these emotive cases to push to legalise drugs?
As has been stated, once legalised, the marketing targets the kids.
We are already the top in the world for recreational drugs and Mental Health is booming.
Who pays to look after these people when it all goes pear shaped.
I don't agree with these Greens policies for drugs and death.
Assisted dying: Church of England seeks inquiry
The Church of England (CofE) has called for an inquiry into assisted dying.
It follows a U-turn by former Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Carey, who said he would back legislation to allow the terminally ill in England and Wales get help to end their lives.
The current Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby says the Assisted Dying Bill is "mistaken and dangerous".
But the Church said an inquiry would include expert opinion and carefully assess the arguments.
Speaking on behalf of the CofE, the Bishop of Carlisle, the Rt Rev James Newcome, said a Royal Commission would allow the "important issue" to be discussed at length.
He said the bill should be withdrawn to allow the inquiry to take place - a call which was immediately rejected by Lord Falconer, the Labour peer who tabled it.
Some 110 peers are already listed to speak when the House of Lords debates the private members bill on Friday.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28278324
However, death (euthanasia), I totally disagree with you. How can you (or anyone else) dictate how I terminate my life?
If someone has terminal cancer, is in hospital and in extreme pain....who are you (we/society) to not help them. If they want to pass away, let's do that, let's help them - not keep them alive in pain for days/weeks/months delaying the inevitable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?