- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,834
- Reactions
- 24,852
BARRIE CASSIDY: The Opposition is asking the Auditor General to look at your advertising. There are a couple of issues they raise.
They claim that this suggestion that only 500 big polluters will have to pay ... what about the 100,000 or so businesses who, from 2014, will have to pay a tax on the transport fuel?
GREG COMBET: Well, this is just another piece of nonsense from Tony Abbot.
Encouraging lower pollution in business transport
Unlike households, many businesses are eligible for a fuel tax credit to offset their fuel excise.
From 2012-13, some businesses will face an effective carbon price on their use of transport fuels through reduced fuel tax credits. Combined with new emissions standards for vehicles, this will help to reduce carbon pollution in the transport sector.
Businesses in the agriculture, fisheries and forestry industries will be exempt from the reduction in fuel tax credits and will therefore be shielded from the effective carbon price on their transport fuel costs. This will help keep food costs down for households. As aviation fuels do not receive fuel tax credits, domestic aviation fuel excise will be increased by an amount equivalent to the carbon price.
It is the Government’s intention to apply the fuel tax credit arrangements to the heavy on-road vehicle industry from 2014-15.
BARRIE CASSIDY: But is he wrong to say that it will apply to transport fuel after 2014 and that will affect 100,000 businesses?
GREG COMBET: Under the carbon price mechanism there's only around 500 countries that will have to surrender permits for the pollution that they are emitting.
We indicated of course that household vehicles, light commercial vehicles won't be affected by the carbon price mechanism. But in off-road usage the Government will make some adjustments to fuel tax credit arrangements.
Barrie Cassidy gave Mr Combet a very easy soft interview, allowing him to rant on with the mantra unhindered by inconsiderate interruptions in search of the truth.
I can't believe Mr Combet could possibly be considered as a future Prime Minister.
Yes the mute button is never far away when Gregory Ivan is featured. This is the Minister briefing the PM on climate change, and doesn't it show.Barrie Cassidy gave Mr Combet a very easy soft interview, allowing him to rant on with the mantra unhindered by inconsiderate interruptions in search of the truth.
I can't believe Mr Combet could possibly be considered as a future Prime Minister.
Yes the mute button is never far away when Gregory Ivan is featured. This is the Minister briefing the PM on climate change, and doesn't it show.
Whenever Gillard of Combet are questioned on the carbon tax they rave on about Tony Abbott "running around scaring people." They are obsessed with him.
Oh I love this one, the British Prime Minister congratulates Gillard on her carbon tax plan, saying it is bold and ambitious.
What does that mean? stupid and unatainable.
If it is so good why doesn't he adopt it? What a load of cr*p.
Bold and ambitious is like saying Kevin Rudd is going to take on Mike Tyson thats also bold and ambitious and just as stupid.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/national/9945032/british-pm-praises-gillards-carbon-plan/
What he probably means is go ahead and cut your own throats you bunch of fools.
Barrie was much keener to interupt the panelist's comments than he was Greg Combet.Barrie Cassidy gave Mr Combet a very easy soft interview, allowing him to rant on with the mantra unhindered by inconsiderate interruptions in search of the truth.
1. Their coal production peaked nearly a century ago and has seen a classic Hubbert decline at the hands of depletion of easily accessible resources. More recently, oil production has entered decline and the gas is fast running out too.I looked up Britains commitment to carbon reduction. They aim to reduce carbon by more than us, it is interesting to see some of the initiatives.
Without wider acceptance of higher bills, Mr Laidlaw was to suggest that carbon emission targets would have to be ditched.
"We as a nation have got one year in which to take action, or our carbon reduction targets may have to be sacrificed in the interests of safeguarding the security of our energy supplies," he was to say.
Hobart City Council has obviously done their sums on the effects of the carbon (dioxide) tax and hundreds of other council will have to do the same and lift their rates to cope.
When Combet was tacked about carbon dioxide being odourless, colourless and non toxic, Combet came back and said "try putting your head in a bag of carbon dioxide and see how long you will live".
I mean to say, is this bloke for real?
http://blogs.news.com.au/couriermai...il/comments/and_the_climate_wont_even_notice/
No doubt every other council in Australia will in due course have to follow suit.Hobart City Council has obviously done their sums on the effects of the carbon (dioxide) tax and hundreds of other council will have to do the same and lift their rates to cope.
AUSTRALIANS will pay an extra $200 million to dump their waste under the Federal Government's carbon tax, a rubbish group claims
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?