Markets are never wrong - opinions often are.
BTW - its how Darvas/Livermore did it.
As far as I'm concerned the market is rarely ever correct - it simply is what people make it to be by exerting their opinions when they participate!
If this is true then why does the market need to have so many corrections?
As far as I'm concerned the market is rarely ever correct - it simply is what people make it to be by exerting their opinions when they participate!
P.S. I strongly advise you not to take my advice!
You could be my own Alter Ego - that's how completely I agree with what you're saying.Well if the share price is wrong, I ask you “What is correct?”.
I suppose you’ll give me some sort of accounting formula with which I can determine the “correct” price. The trouble with that is that if I ask 10 different fundamentalists what the “correct” price is, I’ll get 10 different answers. Obviously there can’t be 10 different “correct” answers! So as there is no agreement as to what actually is correct, how can you say the share price is wrong?
The true value of a share (or any other asset, good or service) is only as much as what someone is willing to pay for it. The stock market, as the name implies, is a marketplace. It’s the marketplace that determines what something is worth (due to supply and demand), not the seller. A seller at a market could put a price of $50 per kilo on his bananas – does that make them worth $50? If he can’t get a sale until he reduces his price to $5, then they are only worth $5, not $50. They may have cost him $10 to produce, but the market only values them at $5. So it’s the market that determines what the correct price is.
Imagine you have a very rare painting – what’s it worth? You could calculate what the value of the materials used in it cost, and add on a component for labor and come up with say $500. But then it sells for $5 Million at auction – which value was correct, the $500 or the $5 Million? If someone is willing to pay $5 Million for it, that that is what it’s worth.
You assume that because the stock price is different to your accounting calculation, that the stock price must be wrong. It’s not the stock price that’s wrong, it’s your calculation that’s wrong! The stock price is always correct, as the stock price is always a correct reflection of supply and demand. No calculation that anyone could ever come up with could correctly gauge supply and demand, only the market place can correctly do this.
Buy rising stocks and sell falling stocks.
Do not trade every day of every year. Trade only when the market is clearly bullish or bearish. Trade in the direction of the
general market. If it's rising you should be long, if it's falling you should be short.
The true value of a share (or any other asset, good or service) is only as much as what someone is willing to pay for it. The stock market, as the name implies, is a marketplace. It’s the marketplace that determines what something is worth (due to supply and demand), not the seller. A seller at a market could put a price of $50 per kilo on his bananas – does that make them worth $50? If he can’t get a sale until he reduces his price to $5, then they are only worth $5, not $50. They may have cost him $10 to produce, but the market only values them at $5. So it’s the market that determines what the correct price is.
Imagine you have a very rare painting – what’s it worth? You could calculate what the value of the materials used in it cost, and add on a component for labor and come up with say $500. But then it sells for $5 Million at auction – which value was correct, the $500 or the $5 Million? If someone is willing to pay $5 Million for it, that that is what it’s worth.
I'm a trader; the market is always correct, I'm the one who is ever wrong
Well if the share price is wrong, I ask you “What is correct?”.
Well if the share price is wrong, I ask you “What is correct?”.
I suppose you’ll give me some sort of accounting formula with which I can determine the “correct” price. The trouble with that is that if I ask 10 different fundamentalists what the “correct” price is, I’ll get 10 different answers. Obviously there can’t be 10 different “correct” answers! So as there is no agreement as to what actually is correct, how can you say the share price is wrong?
You assume that because the stock price is different to your accounting calculation, that the stock price must be wrong.
The stock price is always correct, as the stock price is always a correct reflection of supply and demand. No calculation that anyone could ever come up with could correctly gauge supply and demand, only the market place can correctly do this.
The true value of a share (or any other asset, good or service) is only as much as what someone is willing to pay for it.
Markets are never wrong - opinions often are.
Can I invite someone to give an example where you make a profit without the market being wrong?
A stock is never too high to buy and never too low to short.
Markets are never wrong - opinions often are.
So when BHP was $50 the market was right in pricing it's value and then a few months later when it was $20 the market was still right in pricing it's value and now that it is $43 it is still right.
thats an interesting concept.
So at $50 it wasn't to high to buy and at $20 it's not to low to short, Interesting.
Exactly! It really makes no difference whether you consider the price right or wrong. I think we’re both on the same page, it’s just that your definition of “value” differs from my definition. You buy because you anticipate that the price will increase in the future. You say it moves up because the current price is incorrect (if I understand you correctly) – I say it moves up because the balance of supply/demand changes. I’d say what you’re really doing is anticipating higher future demand for the stock, rather than it moving towards some supposed “correct” value. But the end result is the same though – it’s just a different way of looking at it.My only concern when speculating on market instruments is that I get it at a price that I believe is likely to present a future opportunity for profit. The price can be as incorrect as it pleases, provided I can identify a way to stack the odds of profitability in my favor, I will consider the instrument worthy of my attention.
How can one correctly gauge the true value of all shares on issue of one company on the basis of supply and demand for a smidgin of the total shares on issue? It is simply the way they have chosen to do it (it's not the only conceivable model),
This is another one of those fashionable mantras that I abhor with a passion. This statement can only be true within an extremely limited context but is definitely not universally true. I have approximately 90,000 pieces of evidence that prove that your statement is either incomplete or incorrect. Every one of these reasons has an Australian dollar sign in front of it and each now resides in one or more of my various accounts.
When the highest offer for purchase of one of my houses is beneath the price I am willing to sell at (my valuation) then I simply refuse to sell, no transaction occurs and the bidder walks away empty handed.
Bull run
2001---2007
You still haven’t answered my original question – if the price is wrong, what is right? For you to say the price is wrong, you must know what the right value is, otherwise you can’t say with any certainty that the price is wrong.
How would you value a rare coin? Don’t know about you, but I’d look up the most recent price that it traded for at auction. What’s a gold bar worth – look up the most recent gold price and multiply it by the number of ounces in the bar. Why would you think the value of a share is any different to price? Value is the same thing as price!
So prices were lower in 2001 and higher in 2007? Does it not mean that the market was wrong in 2001? It didn't foresee the growth in economy, rise in income and debt, increase in commodity prices, industrialisation of China, increase in investor demand/confidence/risk appetite...(insert your own explanation - fundamental or technical). Does prices move = market is wrong?
Anytime anyone takes a position, he/she is saying that the market is wrong.
So to summarize OP:
"trend follow = money"
See? That's called efficiency.
Of course, if this tactic was profitable it would already be priced out of the market. A HFT could plug his computer into the exchange, hire a fairly mediocre mathematician, and he would be rolling in dough.
Back to reality.
Know this...the premise of this thread is a crock!
Never do this, always do that, you should be, don't be a blah blah blah...Twaddle, pure twaddle.
Sell XYZ for more than you paid for it, in the shortest time frame possible, following whatever strategy you like....simple hey.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?