This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

JRV - Jervois Global

I'm surprised INL have not sold theirs yet... I sold expecting them to sell out.
 


What a huge overhang, buyers not knowing when INL are going to dump.
 
juddy said:
What a huge overhang, buyers not knowing when INL are going to dump.

INL will not dump, it is currently an integral aspect of the companies balance shhet. Selling down this shares in such a situation would drop INL value. Plain and simple. In addition INL have a significant holding and in speculating they could aquire a further stakeholding toward a hostile takeover with extenal support.

Think for a moment why didn't JRV just take the INL deal? If JRV were so desperate for something to occur why didn't they just take it?

In any negotiation it takes a fundamental, valued reasoning and strong management to recognise the value of a companies assets and potential, to walk away from any arrangement. You only do that if you have something of significant value and you know other 'real' options exist.

In my personal opinion this situation is going to turn 180 degrees in the near term based on the strength and resolve displayed by JRV Management over this matter and the fact that nothing has changed with JRV. The chinese MOU is still in place, JRV has an excellent Ni inferred resource and technology to extract it, they do require funding. This will be highly sought after at the current Ni prices and demand IMO.
 
Think for a moment why didn't JRV just take the INL deal? If JRV were so desperate for something to occur why didn't they just take it?

This needs repeating: because JRV disagree with INLs process which sees the addition of sulphur to the chloride leaching process. JRV are interested in the process initiated by Jaguar but DO NOT LIKE how INL have progressed it and prefer a patented method known as the Aspen method which they may trial in a pilot plant this year.

Why would INL keep shares in a company that might prove them wrong using an INL competitor's patent???? Plus, INL sound vindictive.

Pursell at least had the decency to warn his shareholders on Wednesday before INL posted their notice on Thursday - NOT that anyone listens to Pursell (his lips move but no-one listens) as on Thursday morning the die-hard INL fans were still buying JRV at .034, only to see an intraday of .026, and a two day low of .023.

If anything, the only thing evident so far is how stubborn INL 'supporters' (fans?) are in admitting that JRV don't favour the INL process and are happy to seek alternatives with INL competitors.
 
From the Mining News article above:

"We gave as positive a proposal as we were able to do and I don't think, from our side of the fence, we could not have been more positive than we were without being stupid," Intec managing director Philip Wood told MiningNews.net.

"Am I particularly worried about that? Not really. We were at the limit of what we were able to do and it wasn't enough from Jervois' point of view and I understand that."


What would any normal company do now? Keep an investment in company that will now proceed to market a competitor's patent on a global scale?

"It's self-evident that the market would have liked to have seen a cooperative corporate deal, or merger if you like, between the two companies and it's obviously disappointing for a lot of the holders of Jervois shares if those talks don't come to fruition, so that's why you see a sell-off and that's why the share price is looking pretty weak today.

This means that INL have yet to sell shares and that the shareprice has fallen this low all on it's own?
 
In addition INL have a significant holding and in speculating they could aquire a further stakeholding toward a hostile takeover with extenal support.

"stupid", "limit" = takeover?????

What are INL? schizophrenic? the joker?
 
Hi Hangsen, could never have expressed it better. Too few on the forum take a short term simplistic view. Proper examination of fundamentals and technical analysis for entry and exits together combined leads to success in my HO.
 
Hi Hangsen, could never have expressed it better. Too few on the forum take a short term simplistic view. Proper examination of fundamentals and technical analysis for entry and exits together combined leads to success in my HO.


should read "Too many on the forum..."
 
I dont have a problem with JRV.
I just have a problem with INL.

... and so do INLs shareholders...
INLs shareprice is not looking too healthy.
 
Re INL's "stupidity"......the words astute.......strategic even, seem more appropriate. Hey Atomic...INL has its base in the chem engineering dept at Syd Uni....these guys are talent that JRV should welcome aboard.
 
Funny, I've never seen a change of interest notice accompanied by a little note effectively kicking sand in the face of the company you own shares in... Funny, funny stuff.
 
Re INL's "stupidity"......the words astute.......strategic even, seem more appropriate. Hey Atomic...INL has its base in the chem engineering dept at Syd Uni....these guys are talent that JRV should welcome aboard.
Knowledge does not = wisdom.

Funny, I've never seen a change of interest notice accompanied by a little note effectively kicking sand in the face of the company you own shares in... Funny, funny stuff.
Yep, it was quite bizarre. If INL wanted to deal with a business of mine, I'd want to tell them to F**K OFF! as well. By the sounds of it, they are like one of those women, that if they can't have what they want, will destroy everything around it. Bad news this company. What a disgraceful attitude. Who do they think they are talking to? 16 year olds?

I mean christ, grow up ffs. Sour grapes anyone?
 
Re INL's "stupidity"......the words astute.......strategic even, seem more appropriate. Hey Atomic...INL has its base in the chem engineering dept at Syd Uni....these guys are talent that JRV should welcome aboard.

It's their words! not mine .... unfortunately. Now they're even on record as lying - 'wasn't us who sold shares but the disappointed public'. Id call selling 120million shares "SELLING SHARES".
 

Obviously they have been talking to someone (Purcell) who has so little faith in the prospects for JRV that they offload shares at the first opportunity. Pretty disgraceful! Is probably planning to offload another chunk or two when the Chinese come back and ignite a bit more interest
 
I'm not sure why INL bothered to deny it was them selling JRV shares. At the same time as the "JRV tells INL to shove it" ann. came out, a 50 000 000 sell order was plonked on the market at .028. They didn't even try and disguise it by selling in smaller lots. Funny management at INL but at the end of the day I guess they have 8% or so of JRV for diddley squat.
 
I can just see the INL guys now - geek nerd pimpled science types with bifocals and 7 gigabytes of pr0n, and NO socially redeeming features.
 
INL is required to inform the market re changes in share ownership, ie lodge substantial shareholder change notice.....as they have now done. I hardly think it appropriate to spill the beans to a "Mining News" interviewer
 
Takes 1.2 seconds for an email to circumnavigate the planet, slightly longer for a fax, but not that much longer.

Col that hand is creepy btw.
 
Thats the hand of someone suffering extreme exposure......to the resources sector.
BTW....if JRV had just engineered an 8% holding in INL for nix, would you also be critical???
Something to be said for those of a nerdish/geekish persona....
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...