Reply to thread

coyotte.

I'm not requesting proof.

I'm suggesting that there is a vast difference between methodology THEORY and actual application of ANY methodology.

When people actually try to apply 95% of methods including some suggested but not shown in realtime application---much can be learnt.

Its never been any more or any less from me.

Its been a perception that I'm continually looking for proof that people can trade profitably.

If you or anyone posts a methodology which turns out to be consistently---or even Spasmodically profitable or a complete failure and the populace either help with suggestion to improve it or find weaknesses which improve it or add money management principals to improve it--or explains how their APPLICATION of their analysis can improve others or has improved their own trading---then some will benifit.

The presentation of a method without application is as useful as an empty bottle of draft--Ive got the bottle which says its beer but no contents.

So I have a trading method but have no idea how it would/could or should perform REALTIME.

Frankee's no dummy. Nor McClaren.

But you can learn all you like, the trick is applying knowledge... something I dont see here.---and I get bagged because I point it out.