Terrorists attacking innocent people should not be forgiven.
How individual victims react is a matter for them.
I see forgiveness by a victim preferable to stirring up passions and provoking revenge attacks which is a real possibility if the situation escalates.
That was lip service, clearly. If you can't see that was strategic virtue signaling there is something wrong with you. And whether or not you want to think it was genuinely heartfelt, it is completely counterproductive and inappropriate.
You need a new circle of friends.I must admit, several of the people I have spoken to (not all of them white or Christian, including the one who by far spoke in admiration of the Christchurch terrorist) are on the side of this guy. I have a friend who is a soldier frequently assigned as a peacekeeper in a region where Muslim terror attacks are common (he is neither white, western nor Christian) who only has positive things to say about the guy.
Totally disagree, the speech was made at the National Remembrance Service and the guy was a victim that survived the Massacre.
You need a new circle of friends.
While i agree on the tortured soul part, i do believe, and from past experience that you are definitively with a direction.
Revenge, anger, hate is a sure way to be a tortured soul with no direction.
To reach a state of forgiveness / acceptance is to reach a state of mind to carry on and live a life to its full potential.
Revenge, anger, hate is a sure way to be a tortured soul with no direction.
Well I suppose if Wayne has found it on the net and it trashes Islam it has to be right.
Not an argument bas.Well I suppose if Wayne has found it on the net and it trashes Islam it has to be right.
Defend Islam, don't be an infidel. Heed the warning before watching the video.
Yes brothers, the religion of Peace.
It's funny in a sad way that for 1,400 years we have seen the same pattern, starting with the founder himself. Terrorism and genocide is used, often beginning with quiet peaceful initial colonisation. Once sufficient numbers exist, steps are taken to take control of the government. From there as soon as is tactically possible, the entire population is converted or exterminated (slavery is allowed and encouraged during the conversion). Once the process is complete it is no surprise that in all cases the mentality of the mob above is the result, because you have an entire population which believes in a doctrine which demands absolute control, so obviously it gets control when everyone believes it should, and it commands that anyone who questions a single word of it must be killed. They are all so scared of being accused of not following it to the letter that they do. If anyone doesn't, in this situation it is inherently obvious a mob will form and kill the person not doing it, and in desperation to please such a violent and intolerant doctrine, people will eagerly seek out anyone who commits even the smallest transgression, and everyone will want to personally execute justice because it is their commanded duty, and if they don't do it they are condemned to Hell. They will become so desperate to find infidels that they will see them even where they do not exist, as we see an example of here. This is not unusual, this is both what you would expect from such a doctrine at its end point, and what we do see in Islamic countries which have reached that point.
We can see other countries at all stages of conversion. If we look back at the histories of countries further along we can see that when they were at the same stage of conversion, the same process occurred. It is an ongoing process which has been taking place for 1,400 years. It will not stop until people wake up. The first step is for people to understand what is happening. This will either happen because people actually bother to open their eyes and educate themselves, which if done very soon could prevent a violent outcome, or it will happen when the situation is so extreme that those remaining can't help but see it, which will result in a huge bloody war. Depending on when this happens, either side could win. At this stage it seems clear it will be the latter alternative, the bloody one, and probably Islam will lose, but either way there will be many innocent people (and a few guilty ones) dying in the process.
Currently, it seems the media's motive for presenting a ridiculously Islam-favoured bias in the news is to allow for a rapid expansion of the problem so that it can then flip. Basically, swinging the pendulum very far to engineer the swing back. Perhaps in the big picture this is the least bloody option, but it sure will be bloody if it plays out that way, which seems inevitable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?