- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
trainspotter said:Also probably a better idea is not to take a boogie board full of dope through customs without paying the right people first.
Anyone who visits Indonesia, after this travesty of justice, should be required to sign a waiver that they accept full responsibility for whatever happens to them and will not expect our people to "bring them home" if their holiday goes pear-shaped.
banco said:Not surprised you are from the gold coast. A disproportionate number of the bogans who believe their bogan princess is innocent seem to come from Queensland. In all likelihood if the same fact situation applied in Australia she would have been convicted (as McLovin mentioned the importation of drugs into Australia is a strict liability offence).
The plastic bag I saw on the news last night was not "custom moulded". It appeared to be a standard rectangular vacuum storage bag.Bingo. The baggage handlers had a custom moulded plastic bag made to fit inside that boogie board bag on the off chance that one passed through on its way to Bali.
What an unbelievably ignorant comment!Not surprised you are from the gold coast. A disproportionate number of the bogans who believe their bogan princess is innocent seem to come from Queensland.
The plastic bag I saw on the news last night was not "custom moulded". It appeared to be a standard rectangular vacuum storage bag.
http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/203117737/Clothes_Vacuum_bag_also_used_for.html
Upon release, straight to a 5-star resort. Doesn't send a good message.I am glad to see that a majority of Australians are angry at this pathetic family trying to benefit from criminal activity. We are over it and the whole Schapelle saga.
We all have choices and they made their own.
Australia needs to get tougher on drugs.
I definitely agree, providing the accused has received a fair trial and has been judged guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".Australia needs to get tougher on drugs.
I definitely agree, providing the accused has received a fair trial and has been judged guilty "beyond reasonable doubt".
That standard doesn't apply in Indonesia. Anyway, time to move on.
. As Gibbs CJ put it (pp.536-7, the majority adopting his position on this), ’ "If a person enters Australia carrying a suitcase which has narcotics concealed in it, and offers no convincing explanation of the presence of the narcotics, I should be surprised if a jury would draw any inference other than that he knew that the narcotics were in the case".
Dawson J. observed (at p.597) that
"... the fact that an accused has been found bringing narcotic goods into the country may ordinarily found an inference that the goods are being imported intentionally, notwithstanding protestaions by the accused that he was unaware of their presence or of their nature or quality. At the very least, proof that the goods were brought into the country by the accused will ordinarily mean that there is a case to answer".
Australia needs to get tougher on drugs.
Which drugs?
How much tougher?
Not just Corby but CONVICTED criminals seem to be all the rage with the tabloid media who have no morals about throwing money at them or there family’s to get there story ahead of there rivals, the likes of channel 7 and 9 and the varies woman’s magazines should be ashamed of themselves as the message it sends out is do the crime, do some time and then comfortably retire.
I won’t be watching and I hope ratings plummet and advertisers distance themselves from this sort of thing.
It seems pretty obvious doesn't it that if you are found with drugs in your case when you enter a country they were yours ?. As Gibbs CJ put it (pp.536-7, the majority adopting his position on this), ’ "If a person enters Australia carrying a suitcase which has narcotics concealed in it, and offers no convincing explanation of the presence of the narcotics, I should be surprised if a jury would draw any inference other than that he knew that the narcotics were in the case".
And from the same case...
Dawson J. observed (at p.597) that
"... the fact that an accused has been found bringing narcotic goods into the country may ordinarily found an inference that the goods are being imported intentionally, notwithstanding protestaions by the accused that he was unaware of their presence or of their nature or quality. At the very least, proof that the goods were brought into the country by the accused will ordinarily mean that there is a case to answer".
What about the book and the potential miniseries, Underbali - The Schapelle Corby Story ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?